Centocor Inc v. Genentech Inc
2:08-cv-03573
Overview
Case Number
2:08-cv-03573
Filing Date
2008-05-30
Status
Terminated
Termination Date
2010-09-01
Court
District Court, C.D. California (cacd)
Presiding Judge
Mariana R. Pfaelzer
Nature of Suit
830 Patent
Jurisdiction Type
Federal Question
Cause of Action
28:1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demand
Defendant
Parties
Third Party Defendant
Third Party Plaintiff
Counter Claimant
Counter Defendant
Court & Judges
Court
District Court, C.D. California (cacd)
Presiding Judge
Mariana R. Pfaelzer
Patents Involved
No asserted patent numbers detected in initial docket filings yet.
Docket Entries
COMPLAINT against Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope National Medical Center.(Filing fee $ 350 PAID) filed by plaintiff Centocor Inc.(cbr) (ds). (Entered: 06/04/2008)
2008-05-30
1
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc identifying Corporate Parent Johnson & Johnson, Other Affiliate Schering-Plough Ltd, Other Affiliate Celltech Therapeutics Limited, Other Affiliate Eli Lilly and Company for Centocor Inc. (cbr) (ds). (Entered: 06/04/2008)
2008-05-30
1
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PILOT PROGRAM filed.(cbr) (Entered: 06/04/2008)
2008-05-30
1
REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Centocor Inc. (cbr) (Entered: 06/04/2008)
2008-05-30
1
NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Dianne B Elderkin for Plaintiff Centocor Inc. (cbr) (Entered: 06/04/2008)
2008-05-30
1
NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Barbara L Mullin for Plaintiff Centocor Inc. (cbr) (Entered: 06/04/2008)
2008-05-30
1
NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc. Related Case(s): CV03-2567 MRP (CTx) (at) (Entered: 06/06/2008)
2008-05-30
1
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV03-2567 MRP (CTx). Case transfered from Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg to Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer and Magistrate Judge Carolyn Turchin for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV08-3573 MRP (CTx).Signed by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer (at) (Entered: 06/11/2008)
2008-06-11
1
APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY Dianne B. Elderkin for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. FEE NOT PAID. filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Clark, Gary) (Entered: 06/17/2008)
2008-06-17
1
APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY Barbara L. Mullin for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. FEE NOT PAID. filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Clark, Gary) (Entered: 06/17/2008)
2008-06-17
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Dianne B. Elderkin to appear on behalf of Plaintiff Centocor, Inc. 9, and designating Gary A. Clark as local counsel. (gk) (Entered: 06/20/2008)
2008-06-18
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Barbara L. Mullin to appear on behalf of Plaintifff Centocor, Inc. 10, and designating Gary A. Clark as local counsel. (gk) (Entered: 06/20/2008)
2008-06-18
1
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc, upon City of Hope National Medical Center served on 6/13/2008, answer due 7/3/2008. The Summons and Complaint were served by Hand Delivery service, by Federal statute, upon Juan de Pablo, Process Specialist Authorized to Accept. Due Dilligence declaration no. Original Summons not returned. (Clark, Gary) (Entered: 06/24/2008)
2008-06-24
1
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc, upon Genentech Inc served on 6/13/2008, answer due 7/3/2008. The Summons and Complaint were served by Hand Delivery service, by Federal statute, upon Rebecca Riordan, Authorized to Accept. Due Dilligence declaration No. Original Summons Not returned. (Clark, Gary) (Entered: 06/24/2008)
2008-06-24
1
FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Genentech Inc answer now due 8/7/2008, filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Arnold, Brian) (Entered: 06/30/2008)
2008-06-30
1
APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY Marcus E. Sernel for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. FEE NOT PAID. filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Arnold, Brian) (Entered: 07/02/2008)
2008-07-02
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer granting First Stipulation Extending Time to Answer 15 : IT IS ORDERED that Defendants time to reply to Plaintiffs Complaint for Declaratory Judgment is extended to and including August 7, 2008. (pso) (Entered: 07/03/2008)
2008-07-03
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer Granting APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY Marcus E. Sernel for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 16 by Marcus E. Sernel to appear on behalf of Defendant Genentech Inc.Brian G. Arnold is designated as local counsel. FEE PAID. (pso) (Entered: 07/07/2008)
2008-07-03
1
APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY Mark A. Pals for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. FEE NOT PAID. filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Arnold, Brian) (Entered: 07/08/2008)
2008-07-08
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer Granting APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY Mark A. Pals for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 19 by Mark A. Pals to appear on behalf of Defendant Genentech Inc.Brian G. Arnold is designated as local counsel. Fee paid. (pso) (Entered: 07/09/2008)
2008-07-09
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss or Strike Fourth Cause of Action filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/8/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Brian G. Arnold in Support, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Proposed Order)(Arnold, Brian) (Entered: 08/07/2008)
2008-08-07
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Genentech Inc of Defendants' Memo in Support of Mo. to Dismiss or Strike Fourth Cause of Action; and Confidential Exs. A & B to the Declaration of B. Arnold. (Arnold, Brian) (Entered: 08/07/2008)
2008-08-07
1
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Genentech Inc identifying Roche Holding AG as Corporate Parent. (Arnold, Brian) (Entered: 08/07/2008)
2008-08-07
1
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Hope National Medical Center, identifying City of Hope, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Arthur Riggs, Shmuel Cabilly. (Lipner, Joseph) (Entered: 08/07/2008)
2008-08-07
1
APPLICATION to File Under Seal filed by Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. Lodged Proposed Order. (gk) (Entered: 08/08/2008)
2008-08-07
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer, GRANTING APPLICATION to Seal 25 (lra) (Entered: 08/11/2008)
2008-08-08
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Dismiss or Strike Fourth Cause of Action 21 filed (lra) (Entered: 08/11/2008)
2008-08-08
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - EXHIBIT A AND B to DECLARATION OF BRIAN G. ARNOLD IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to Dismiss or Strike Fourth Cause of Action 21 filed(lra) (Entered: 08/11/2008)
2008-08-08
1
MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Dismiss or Strike Fourth Cause of Action 21 [PUBLIC VERSION] filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Arnold, Brian) (Entered: 08/11/2008)
2008-08-11
1
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Title page lacks counsel's name, California bar number, office address, telephone and facsimile numbers and e-mail address, commencing with line 1 at the left margin, pursuant to Local Rule 11-3.8(a) RE: Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) filed 8/7/2008 22 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (gk) (Entered: 08/12/2008)
2008-08-11
1
STIPULATION to Continue Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss from September 8, 2008 to September 22, 2008 Re: MOTION to Dismiss or Strike Fourth Cause of Action 21 filed by Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope National Medical Center. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Clark, Gary) (Entered: 08/15/2008)
2008-08-15
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer ON STIPULATION FORCONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 31 : 1. The hearing on Defendants motion to dismiss or strike the Fourth Cause of Action in Plaintiffs complaint shall be continued from September 8, 2008 to September 29, 2008, at 11:00 a.m. 2. Plaintiff shall have to and including September 3, 2008, to file and serve its response to the motion. (pso) (Entered: 08/18/2008)
2008-08-18
1
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 21 : The Court on its own motion advances the hearing in the matter, scheduled for Monday, September 29, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. to Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. (pso) (Entered: 08/20/2008)
2008-08-20
1
OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss or Strike Fourth Cause of Action 21 filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(Elderkin, Dianne) (Entered: 09/03/2008)
2008-09-03
1
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope National Medical Center; amending Complaint 1 ; filed by Plaintiff Centocor, Inc. (gk) (Entered: 09/04/2008)
2008-09-03
1
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause as to a Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Elderkin, Dianne) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
2008-09-05
1
MEMORANDUM in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause as to a Preliminary Injunction 36 filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Dianne B. Elderkin, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12)(Elderkin, Dianne) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
2008-09-05
1
MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer re: EX-PARTE APPLICATION FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. The case is called and appearances are made. Court and counsel argue the pending application. The Court denies the Ex-Parte Application for TRO. The Court orders the parties to meet and confer and prepare a Stipulation to resolve the Motion to Dismiss and Preliminary Injunction to be filed on or before September 12, 2008. The hearing on the Preliminary Injunction is scheduled for September 24, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. Court Reporter: Leandra Amber. (pso) (Entered: 09/18/2008)
2008-09-05
1
Joint STIPULATION to Withdraw Motion EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause as to a Preliminary Injunction 36, MOTION to Dismiss or Strike Fourth Cause of Action 21 filed by Defendant Genentech Inc.(Arnold, Brian) (Entered: 09/09/2008)
2008-09-09
1
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO RESOLVE (1) DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Upon the Joint Stipulation 38, it is hereby ordered that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 21 has been rendered moot by the filing of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and is hereby withdrawn. Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause as to a Preliminary Injunction 36 is hereby withdrawn. Plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction hearing in connection with this Application is moot. Defendants shall file their answer and counterclaims or othrewise plead in response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 35 no later than 9/22/2008. (gk) (Entered: 09/12/2008)
2008-09-12
1
ANSWER to Amended Complaint 35 JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendant Genentech Inc.(Arnold, Brian) (Entered: 09/19/2008)
2008-09-19
1
ANSWER to Amended Complaint 35 filed by Defendant City of Hope National Medical Center.(Lipner, Joseph) (Entered: 09/19/2008)
2008-09-19
1
REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Genentech Inc. and City of Hope National Medical Center. (gk) (Entered: 09/22/2008)
2008-09-19
1
COUNTERCLAIM against Counterdefendant Centocor, Inc.; with Jury Demand filed by Defendants and Counterclaimants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3)(gk) (Entered: 09/22/2008)
2008-09-19
1
Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to Counterclaim 44 filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Elderkin, Dianne) (Entered: 10/02/2008)
2008-10-02
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Reply 45 : Plaintiff's time to reply or otherwise respond to Defendants' counterclaim is extended to 11/28/08. No further extensions will be granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. (pso) (Entered: 10/07/2008)
2008-10-02
1
MINUTES of Telephonic Status Conference held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer:Court and counsel discuss the status of the case and counterclaims.Court Reporter: John Turman. (kpa) (Entered: 10/29/2008)
2008-10-02
1
REQUEST to Substitute attorney Bruce G. Chapman in place of attorney Gary A. Clark filed by Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Re Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 10/09/2008)
2008-10-09
1
FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS against Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Centocor, Inc.; amending Counterclaim 44 ; with Jury Demand filed by Defendants and Counterclaimants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3)(gk) (Entered: 10/14/2008)
2008-10-10
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer Granting Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney Bruce G. Chapman of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP for Plaintiff Centocor, Inc. in place of attorney Gary A. Clark and Darren M. Franklin of Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP 47 . (gk) (Entered: 10/16/2008)
2008-10-15
1
NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Keith Douglas Fraser counsel for Counter Defendant Centocor Inc, Plaintiff Centocor Inc. Filed by Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Centocor, Inc. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
2008-10-24
1
ANSWER to Amended Counterclaim 48 filed by Plaintiff-Counterdefendant Centocor Inc.(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
2008-11-26
1
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court, on its own motion, orders counsel to appear telephonically for a Status Conference on 1/15/2009 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk) (Entered: 01/15/2009)
2009-01-14
1
MINUTES OF Telephonic Status Conference held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Court and counsel discuss scheduling a Status Conference on 2/23/2009, but later agreed by counsel to be held on 2/9/09 at 11:00 AM. Counsel please note that the Court has continued the matter to be heard 2/9/2009 01:00 PM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. Court and counsel discuss Counterclaims, discovery exchange, Markman Hearing, and the re-exam. Court Reporter: Rosalyn Adams. (gk) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
2009-01-15
1
APPLICATION for attorney Steven D. Maslowski to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Plaintiff / Counterdefendant Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing -- Supreme Court of Pennslyvania, # 2 Proposed Order Re Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 01/20/2009)
2009-01-20
1
APPLICATION for attorney Aleksander J. Goranin to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Plaintiff / Counterdefendant Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing -- Supreme Court of Pennslyvania, # 2 Proposed Order Re Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 01/20/2009)
2009-01-20
1
APPLICATION for attorney Amanda M. Kessel to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Plaintiff / Counterdefendant Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing -- Supreme Court of Pennslyvania, # 2 Proposed Order Re Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 01/20/2009)
2009-01-20
1
APPLICATION for attorney Matthew A. Pearson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Plaintiff / Counterdefendant Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing -- Supreme Court of Pennslyvania, # 2 Proposed Order Re Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 01/20/2009)
2009-01-20
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Matthew A. Pearson to appear on behalf of Plaintiff Centocor Inc. 57 . Bruce G. Chapman is designated as local counsel. Fee PAID. (gk) (Entered: 01/22/2009)
2009-01-21
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Amanda M. Kessel to appear on behalf of Plaintiff Centocor, Inc. 56 . Bruce G. Chapman is designated as local counsel. Fee PAID. (gk) (Entered: 01/22/2009)
2009-01-21
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Aleksander J. Goranin to appear on behalf of Plaintiff Centocor, Inc. 55 . Bruce G. Chapman is designated as local counsel. Fee PAID. (gk) (Entered: 01/22/2009)
2009-01-21
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Steven D. Maslowski to appear on behalf of Plaintiff Centocor, Inc. 54 . Bruce G. Chapman is designated as local counsel. Fee PAID. (gk) (Entered: 01/22/2009)
2009-01-21
1
NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Steven D Maslowski for Plaintiff Centocor Inc re application 54 and order 61 . (ds) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
2009-01-26
1
NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Aleksander J Goranin for Plaintiff Centocor Inc re Application 55 and Order 60 . (ds) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
2009-01-26
1
NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Amanda M Kessel for Plaintiff Centocor Inc re Application 56 and Order 59 . (ds) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
2009-01-26
1
NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Matthew A Pearson for Plaintiff Centocor Inc re Application 57 and Order 58 . (ds) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
2009-01-26
1
NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Fee in the amount of $185 received on 1/21/09. G109 dated 1/26/09 62 issued in error. (ds) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
2009-01-26
1
NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Fee in the amount of $185 received on 1/21/09. G109 dated 1/26/09 63 issued in error. (ds) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
2009-01-26
1
Fee in the amount of $185 received on 1/21/09. G109 dated 1/26/09 64 issued in error. (ds) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
2009-01-26
1
NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Fee in the amount of $185 received on 1/21/09. G109 dated 1/26/09 65 issued in error. (ds) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
2009-01-26
1
JOINT RULE 26 (F) STATUS REPORT REPORT of RULE 26(F) STATUS REPORT filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Counter Defendant Centocor Inc, Plaintiff Centocor Inc, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope National Medical Center. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 02/02/2009)
2009-02-02
1
MINUTES of Scheduling Conference held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Court and counsel discuss the claims and terms at issue. For Patent 335, claims 1,2,3 & 7. For Patent 415, claims 18, 20 & 33. The parties determine that a markman hearing and some discovery is necessary. The Court would like the markman hearing set in May 2009 for Cabilly II. The Court Orders the parties to meet and confer and submit a proposed schedule to the Court on or before February 17, 2009. Court Reporter: Margaret Babykin. (mg) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
2009-02-09
1
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Daralyn J Durie on behalf of Counter Claimant Genentech Inc, Defendant Genentech Inc (Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 02/17/2009)
2009-02-17
1
NOTICE of Change of Address by Daralyn J Durie attorney for Counter Claimant Genentech Inc, Defendant Genentech Inc, changing Keker & Van Nest LLP to Durie Tangri Lemley Roberts & Kent LLP, 332 Pine Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 362-6666, Fax: (415) 236-3600, ddurie@durietangri.com. Filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 02/17/2009)
2009-02-17
1
JOINT SUBMISSION filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Counter Defendant Centocor Inc, Plaintiff Centocor Inc, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope National Medical Center re: Scheduling Conference,, 72 (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 02/17/2009)
2009-02-17
1
STATUS REPORT regarding Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit NIRC, # 2 Exhibit Examiners Interview Summary, # 3 Exhibit Supplemental Amendment)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 02/24/2009)
2009-02-24
1
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Title page is missing. Communications with the Judge in letter format, Local Rule 83-2.11 RE: Letter from Defendant's Counsel re Patent and Trademark Office's Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate filed 2/24/2009 76 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (gk) (Entered: 03/02/2009)
2009-02-27
1
BRIEF filed by Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, City of Hope National Medical Center. Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Opening Brief on Claim Construction (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 03/24/2009)
2009-03-24
1
DECLARATION of Marcus E. Sernel re Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 78 Declaration of Marcus E. Sernel in Support of Genentech Inc.'s and City of Hope's Opening Brief on Claim Construction filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope National Medical Center. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 03/24/2009)
2009-03-24
1
DECLARATION of Dr. Mary-Jane Gething re Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 78 Declaration of Dr. Mary-Jane Gething filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope National Medical Center. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 03/24/2009)
2009-03-24
1
BRIEF filed by Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, City of Hope National Medical Center. Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's CORRECTED Opening Brief on Claim Construction regarding Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 78 . (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 04/02/2009)
2009-04-02
1
MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court having received and reviewed the Joint Submission filed on 2/24/2009 75 finds the dates acceptable as proposed. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) (Entered: 04/06/2009)
2009-04-03
1
BRIEF filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc. Re Opening Brief on Claim Construction regarding Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 81 . (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel in Support of Centocor, Inc.'s Opening Brief on Claim Construction, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J (1 of 3), # 12 Exhibit J (2 of 3), # 13 Exhibit J (3 of 3), # 14 Exhibit K, # 15 Exhibit L, # 16 Exhibit M)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/14/2009)
2009-04-14
1
NOTICE of Change of Address by Marcus E Sernel attorney for Counter Claimant Genentech Inc, changing address to Kirkland & Ellis LLP; 300 North LaSalle Street; Chicago, IL 60654; Tel: (312) 862-2000; Fax: (312) 862-2200. Filed by Counter Claimant Genentech, Inc. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 04/28/2009)
2009-04-28
1
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: account information was not updated in the ECF system RE: Notice of Change of Address, 84 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (vh) (Entered: 04/28/2009)
2009-04-28
1
REPLY filed by Counter Claimant Genentech Inc to Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 83 Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Reply Brief on Claim Construction (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 04/28/2009)
2009-04-28
1
DECLARATION of Marcus E. Sernel re Reply (non-motion) 86 Supplemental Declaration of Marcus E. Sernel in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Reply Brief on Claim Construction filed by Counter Claimant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 04/28/2009)
2009-04-28
1
MINUTES OF Markman Hearing held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Counsel presents a tutorial and discusses the terms at issue. The Courts order will follow. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (gk) (Entered: 05/13/2009)
2009-05-12
1
STIPULATION to Amend Complaint - (Discovery) 1 filed by Defendant City of Hope National Medical Center. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Gindler, David) (Entered: 05/13/2009)
2009-05-13
1
TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 5/12/09 10:00 am. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Miriam Baird, phone number mvb11893@aol.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 6/3/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/13/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/11/2009. (Baird, Miriam) (Entered: 05/13/2009)
2009-05-13
1
NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 5/12/09 10:00 AM (Baird, Miriam) (Entered: 05/13/2009)
2009-05-13
1
NOTICE OF EX PARTE REEXAMINATION CERTIFICATE ISSUANCE filed by Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Reexamination Certificate))(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/21/2009)
2009-05-21
1
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court reaches the following conclusions: In the Cabilly II patent: The term "immunoglobulin molecule" does not require construction at this time. The term "produced as separate molecules in a single host cell" is clear on its face and does not require construction. The term "vector" means "expression vector." The term "transformed host cell comprising at least two vectors" means "a host cell into which two or more vectors have been introduced, including a host cell whose heritable DNA has been altered by the integration of two or more vectors." In the Basey patent: The term "about" does not require construction at this time. (gk) (Entered: 06/08/2009)
2009-06-08
1
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) by Senior U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The Claim Construction Order of June 8, 2009 93 is amended nunc protunc as follows: Page 10, line 22, the first occurrence of antigen is replaced with immunoglobulin. (pp) (Entered: 06/09/2009)
2009-06-09
1
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) by Senior U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The Court, on its motion, sets a Telephone Conference set for 6/10/2009 at 1:00 p.m. (pp) (Entered: 06/10/2009)
2009-06-10
1
MINUTES OF Telephonic Status Conference by Senior U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The case is called and appearances are made. Court and counsel discuss how to proceed. The parties inform the Court that they will submit a stipulation and proposed order regarding amended pleadings, infringement as to third parties and a proposed schedule.Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (pp) (Entered: 06/11/2009)
2009-06-10
1
REQUEST to Substitute attorney DARALYN J. DURIE in place of attorney JOHN W. KEKER filed by defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 06/11/2009)
2009-06-11
1
Joint STIPULATION to AMEND filed by Plaintiff / Counterclaimant Centocor Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A -- [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit B -- Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Second Amended Counterclaims; Jury Trial Demanded, # 3 Proposed Order Re Joint Stipulation to Amend Pleadings)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 06/15/2009)
2009-06-15
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Inc, Plaintiff Centocor Inc of (1) [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment; (2) Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Second Amended Counterclaims; Demand for Jury Trial. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 06/15/2009)
2009-06-15
1
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer GRANTING 97 Request to Substitute Attorney. Added attorney Daralyn J Durie for Genentech Inc. Attorney John W Keker terminated (pp) (Entered: 06/16/2009)
2009-06-15
1
Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Briefing re Scope of 1994 Agreement Between Centocor, Inc. and Genentech, Inc. filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 06/26/2009)
2009-06-26
1
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND PLEADINGS RE: (1) TO IDENTIFY CORRECT CENTOCOR ENTITY AS PLAINTIFF, (2) TO SUBSTITUTE CITY OF HOPE AS DEFENDANT, AND(3) TO ADD ADDITIONAL PARTIES AS COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS by Senior, U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer re 98 . Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 1) Centocor, Inc. shall file its Second Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A to the stipulation of the parties; 2) Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope shall file their Second AmendedCounterclaims, attached as Exhibit B to the stipulation of the parties; 3) This stipulation and agreement between the parties as to the filing ofamended pleadings shall not in any way constitute a waiver by any party or anynewly added party of any defenses or arguments that it may have with respect to any claim made against it. (pp) (Entered: 06/30/2009)
2009-06-29
1
SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS against Counter-Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.; amending First Amended Counterclaim 48 ; with Jury Demand filed by Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. (gk) (gk). (Entered: 07/02/2009)
2009-07-01
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Centocor Inc of Second Amended Complaint For Declaratory Judgment. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
2009-07-02
1
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE SCOPE OF 1994 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CENTOCOR, INC. AND GENENTECH, INC. by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Upon Stipulation 101, it is hereby ordered that: Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc. and counter-defendants shall file their opening motion and supporting brief relating to the scope of the 1994 Agreement on or by 8/10/2009. Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope shall file their responsive brief and any cross motion and supporting brief relating to the scope of the 1994 Agreement on or by 8/20/2009. Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc. and counter-defendants shall file their reply brief and responsive brief to any cross motion relating to the scope of the 1994 Agreement on or by 8/26/2009. Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope shall file their reply brief relating to the scope of the 1994 Agreement on or by 8/31/2009. (gk) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
2009-07-02
1
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope; amending First Amended Complaint 35 ; filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. (gk) (Entered: 07/06/2009)
2009-07-02
1
ANSWER to Amended Complaint 106 and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Genentech Inc.(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
2009-07-14
1
ANSWER to Amended Complaint 106 Answer to Second Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant City of Hope.(Lipner, Joseph) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
2009-07-14
1
REPLY filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. to Amended Counterclaim 105 and Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group LLC, Centocor Biologics LLC and JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.'s Reply to Second Amended Counterclaims (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/14/2009)
2009-07-14
1
REPLY filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. to Reply (non-motion), Reply (non-motion) 109, Amended Counterclaim 105 (FIRST AMENDED) and FIRST AMENDED REPLY TO SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS BY THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS GLOBAL PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLY GROUP, LLC, CENTOCOR BIOLOGICS, LLC AND JOM PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/20/2009)
2009-07-20
1
Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Third-Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/23/2009)
2009-07-23
1
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Order Granting Substitution of Attorney)(Keker, John) (Entered: 07/24/2009)
2009-07-24
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 9/14/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel in Support Thereof, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I (1of5), # 11 Exhibit I (2of5), # 12 Exhibit I (3of5), # 13 Exhibit I (4of5), # 14 Exhibit I (5of5), # 15 Exhibit J-EE Under Seal, # 16 Exhibit FF, # 17 Proposed Order Granting Summary Judgment to Dismiss TNF-Alpha Counterclaims)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/10/2009)
2009-08-10
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. of (1) Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims; (2) Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law; (3) Exhibits J-EE to Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel in Support Thereof; (4) Application to File Documents Under Seal; (5) [Proposed] Order To File Documents Under Seal. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/10/2009)
2009-08-10
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. of (1) Application to File Under Seal Corrected Exhibits T, U and W to Declaration of Amanda Kessel Re Motion for Summary Judgment; (2) [Proposed] Order to File Corrected Exhibits Under Seal; and (3) Corrected Confidential Exhibits T, U and W to Declaration of Amanda Kessel re Motion for Summary Judgment. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/11/2009)
2009-08-11
1
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. correcting MOTION for Summary Judgment as to to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims 113, Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 115 (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/11/2009)
2009-08-11
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - MEMORANDUM in Support of Centrocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its CounterDefendant Affilicates' MOTION for Summary Judgment as to to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims, filed. (lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009)
2009-08-11
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - STATEMENT of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law In Support of Centrocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its Counter-defendant Affilicates' MOTION for Summary Judgment as to to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims, filed. (lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009)
2009-08-11
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - CONFINDENTIAL EXHIBITS J-EE to Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel in support of Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its counter-defendant Affiliates' MOTION for Summary Judgment as to to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims, filed (Attachments: # 1 PART 2, # 2 PART 3, # 3 PART 4, # 4 PART 5, # 5 PART 6, # 6 PART 7, # 7 PART 8)(lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009)
2009-08-11
1
APPLICATION to File Under Seal Corrected Exhibits T, U and W to the Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel Re Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims; filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. and Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC and JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. Lodged proposed order. (mg) (Entered: 08/12/2009)
2009-08-11
1
APPLICATION to File Under Seal Documents in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims; filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., and Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (mg) (Entered: 08/13/2009)
2009-08-11
1
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. and Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., re APPLICATION to Seal 121, [Proposed] order, Corrected Confidential Exhibits T, U and W to Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel; served on 8/11/09. (mg) (Entered: 08/13/2009)
2009-08-11
1
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. and Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., re Memorandum in Support of Motion 117, Statement of Uncontroverted Facts 118, Confidential Exhibits 119, APPLICATION to Seal 121 ; served on 8/10/09. (mg) (Entered: 08/13/2009)
2009-08-11
1
ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court, having considered Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. and its Counter-defendant Affiliates' 121 Application to File Under Seal, the Court orders that Plaintiff's Application to file under seal is GRANTED. (mg) (Entered: 08/13/2009)
2009-08-11
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Corrected Confidential Exhibits T, U and W to Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Defendants' TNF-ALPHA Counterclaims, based on section 2.02 of the 1994 Genentech-Centocor License Agreement. (mat) (Entered: 08/13/2009)
2009-08-12
1
ORDER TO FILE CORRECTED EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 120 Application to Seal. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to File Under Seal Corrected Exhibits T,U and W to the Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel is GRANTED, and no persons other than Court and counsel or record are authorized to inspect the above-listed records filed under seal. (kpa) (Entered: 08/14/2009)
2009-08-12
1
NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Marcus E Sernel counsel for Defendant Genentech Inc.Brian G. Arnold is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendant Genentech, Inc. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 08/17/2009)
2009-08-17
1
Joint STIPULATION to Reschedule Hearing Date on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding The Scope of a 1994 Agreement Between Centocor, Inc. and Genentech, Inc. (to September 3, 2009 at 11:00 a.m.) filed by Defendant & Counter-Plaintiff Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 08/19/2009)
2009-08-19
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope of Ex Parte Application to Compel Documents, Memorandum in Support, Exhibits A-F to Declaration, Proposed Order re Application to Compel, Application to File Under Seal, Proposed Order re Filing Under Seal. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
2009-08-20
1
DECLARATION of Marcus E. Sernel re Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 129 Declaration In Support of Ex Parte Application to Compel Documents Allegedly Covered by Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Purported "Common Interest" Privilege With Third Parties filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Sealed), # 2 Exhibit B (Sealed), # 3 Exhibit C (Sealed), # 4 Exhibit D (Sealed), # 5 Exhibit E (Sealed), # 6 Exhibit F (Sealed))(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
2009-08-20
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer GRANTING Stipulation to Reschedule 128 Motion set for hearing on 9/3/2009 at 11:00 AM. (pp) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
2009-08-20
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope of Memo in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, Exhibits D-U to Declaration in Support of Cross-Motion and in Opposition to Motion, Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Cross-Motion, Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Opposition to Motion, Application to File Under Seal, Proposed Order re Filing Under Seal. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
2009-08-20
1
NOTICE OF MOTION re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims 113 Notice of Motion and Motion in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope. Motion set for hearing on 9/3/2009 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
2009-08-20
1
DECLARATION re Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 132, Notice of Motion, 133 In Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and Its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D (Sealed), # 5 Exhibit E (Sealed), # 6 Exhibit F (Sealed), # 7 Exhibit G (Sealed), # 8 Exhibit H (Sealed), # 9 Exhibit I (Sealed), # 10 Exhibit J (Sealed), # 11 Exhibit K (Sealed), # 12 Exhibit L (Sealed), # 13 Exhibit M (Sealed), # 14 Exhibit N (Sealed), # 15 Exhibit O (Sealed), # 16 Exhibit P (Sealed), # 17 Exhibit Q (Sealed), # 18 Exhibit R (Sealed), # 19 Exhibit S (Sealed), # 20 Exhibit T (Sealed), # 21 Exhibit U (Sealed))(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
2009-08-20
1
MINUTE ORDER - In Chambers by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court Orders the plaintiff to file opposition to the ex parte application on or before Tuesday, August 25, 2009 by 4:00 p.m. (cs) (Entered: 08/21/2009)
2009-08-21
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. of (1) Opposition to Ex Parte Application to Compel Documents Filed by Genentech and City of Hope; and (2) Exhibits A-H in Support of Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel in Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/25/2009)
2009-08-25
1
DECLARATION of Amanda M. Kessel re Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 136 In Support of Opposition to Genentech's Ex Parte Application to Compel Documents Allegedly Covered by "Common Interest Privilege" with Third Parties filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/25/2009)
2009-08-25
1
APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.'S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES' OPPOSITION TO EX PARTE APPLICATION OF DEFENDANTS filed by Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, and JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (pp) (Entered: 08/26/2009)
2009-08-25
1
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., re Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 136, Declaration (non-motion), Declaration (non-motion), Declaration (non-motion) 137, APPLICATION to Seal 138 served on 8/25/09. (pp) (Entered: 08/26/2009)
2009-08-25
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - GENETECH INC.'S AND CITY OF HOPE'S EX PARTE APPLICATION To Compel Documents Allegedly Covered by Centocor Ortho Biotechs Inc's Purported "Common Interest" Privilege with Third parties.(lra) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-25
1
SEALED DOCUMENT APPLICATION to File Under Seal documents in Support of Genentech Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for summary Judgment and Opposition to Centorcor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and Its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for summary Judgment. (lra) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-25
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - EX PARTE APPLICATION to File Under Seal (lra) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-25
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIESin Support of Genetech Inc's and city of Hope's EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Documents Allegedly Covered by Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc's Purposrted Common Interest Privilege With Third Parties.(lra) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-25
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of MARCUS E. SERNEL IN SUPPORT OF GENETECH INC.'S AND CITY OF HOPE'S EX PARTE APPLICATION To Compel Documents Allegedly Covered by Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc's Purported Common Interest Privilege with Third Parties.# 1 PART 2, # 2 PART 3)(lra) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-25
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - STATEMENT Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law In Support Of Genetech Inc's and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for summary Judgment (lra) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-25
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - MEMORANDUM IN Support of Genetech Inc's and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for summary Judgment and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc's and Its Counter-defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment (lra) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-25
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - STATEMENT Genuine Issues in Support of Genetech Inc's and City of Hope's Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc's and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment (lra) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-25
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of MARCUS E. SERNEL In support of Genetech Inc's and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc's and its Counter-defendant Affiliates' Motion for summary Judgment. (Attachments: # 1 PART 2, # 2 PART 3, # 3 PART 4, # 4 PART 5, # 5 [ART 6)(lra) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-25
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. of (1) Application to File Under Seal; (2) Proposed Order to File Under Seal; (3) Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment & Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; (4) Centocor's Statement of Genuine Issues; (5) Centocor's Response to Genentech's Statement of Genuine Issues; Exhibits GG-KK to Supplemental Declaration of Amanda Kessel; (7) Proof of Service. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 08/26/2009)
2009-08-26
1
DECLARATION of Amanda M. Kessel re Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 140 Supplemental Declaration in Support of Plaintiff's and Third-Party Defendants' (1) Reply Re Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) Opposition to Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 08/26/2009)
2009-08-26
1
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer GRANTING Application as referenced in 143 . (pp) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-26
1
APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Reply Memorandum and Other Papers in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., and Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (gk) (Entered: 08/27/2009)
2009-08-26
1
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. and Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, and JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. re Application to File Documents Under Seal 152 ; Proposed Order; Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendants' Reply Memorandum and Other Papers in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, served on 8/26/2009. (gk) (Entered: 08/28/2009)
2009-08-26
1
ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Application to File Under Seal 145 is GRANTED as follows: (1) Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Opposition to Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Ex Parte Application to Compel Documents Allegedly Covered by Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Purported "Common Interest" Privilege with Third Parties shall be filed under seal; (2) Exhibits A-H to the Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel in Support of Centocor and Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Opposition to Genentech and City of Hope's Ex Parte Application to Compel Documents Allegedly Covered by Centocor OrthoBiotech, Inc.'s purported "Common Interest" Privilege with Third parties shall be filed under seal; and (3) No person other than the Court and counsel of record are authorized to inspect the above-listed records filed under seal. (gk) (Entered: 08/28/2009)
2009-08-27
1
ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: IT IS ORDERED that Centocor's Application to File Under Seal 152 is GRANTED as follows: (1) Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and Counter-Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; (2) Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech's Opposition to Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; (3) Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Response to Genentech's Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and Its Counter-Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment; (4) Exhibits GG-KK to Supplemental Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and Counter-Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; and (5) No persons other than the Court and counsel of record are authorized to inspect the above-listed records filed under seal. (gk) (Entered: 08/28/2009)
2009-08-27
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Plaintiff's/Counter-Defendants' Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (mat) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
2009-08-27
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Opposition to Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (mat) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
2009-08-27
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Centocor OrthoBiotech, Inc.'s Reponse to Genentech's Statment of Geuine Issues in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Affiliates Motion for Summary Judgment. (mat) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
2009-08-27
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Centocor Ortho Biotech's Opposition to Genentech's Exparte Application to Compel Documents Allegedly Covered by Common Interest Privilege with Third Parties. (mat) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
2009-08-27
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Confidential Exhibits A-H to Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Opposition to Defendants' Exparte Application to Compel Documents Allegegdly Covered by Common Interest Privilege with Third Parties. (mat) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
2009-08-27
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Confidential Exhibits GG-KK to Supplemental Declaration of Amanda M. Kessel in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' (1) Reply Re: Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims; and (2) Opposition to Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. (mat) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
2009-08-27
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope of Reply Memorandum in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; Exhibits V-Z to the Supplemental Declaration of Marcus E. Sernel in Support; Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Response to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Statement of Genuine Issues and Supplemental Statement of Genuine Issues; Civil Local Rule 79-5.1 Ex Parte Application to File Under Seal;[Proposed] Order to File Under Seal. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
2009-08-31
1
DECLARATION of Marcus E. Sernel re Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 162 Supplemental Declaration In Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit V (Filed Under Seal), # 2 Exhibit W (Filed Under Seal), # 3 Exhibit X (Filed Under Seal), # 4 Exhibit Y (Filed Under Seal), # 5 Exhibit Z (Filed Under Seal))(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
2009-08-31
1
APPLICATION for Order for TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS/COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THEIR CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Defendant(s) and Counter-Plaintiff(s) Genentech Inc, City of Hope. (pp) (Entered: 09/02/2009)
2009-08-31
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer granting 164 Application for Order to file Documents Under Seal. (pp) (Entered: 09/02/2009)
2009-09-01
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF GENENTECH, INC.'S AND CITY OF HOPE'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (lra) (Entered: 09/03/2009)
2009-09-01
1
SEALED DOCUMENT SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of MARCUS E. SERNEL In Support of Genentech Inc.'s Reply Memorandum in support of Their Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (lra) (Entered: 09/03/2009)
2009-09-01
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - GENENTECH INC.'S AND CITY OF HOPE'S RESPONSE to Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s Statement of Genuine Issues and Supplemental Statement of Genuine Issues. (lra) (Entered: 09/03/2009)
2009-09-01
1
MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims 113 REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 09/02/2009)
2009-09-02
1
STATEMENT of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Plaintiff & Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Defendants' TNF-Alpha Countercalims Based on Section 2.02 of 1994 Genentech-Centocor License Agreement MOTION for Summary Judgment as to to Dismiss Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims 113 REDACTED PUBLIC VERSION filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 09/02/2009)
2009-09-02
1
MINUTES OF IN COURT HEARING NON-EVIDENTIARY (1) MOTION IN SUPPORT OF CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.S AND ITS COUNTER DEFENDANT AFFILIATES MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS TNFALPHA COUNTERCLAIMS (fld 8/10/09) 113 and (2) MOTION IN SUPPORT OF GENENTECH, INC.S AND CITY OF HOPES CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (fld 8/20/09) 133 . The case is called and appearances are made. Court and counsel argue the motions. The Court takes the matters under submission and its order will follow. Motion hearing held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer.Court Reporter: Mark Schwietzer. (pp) (Entered: 09/04/2009)
2009-09-03
1
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The Court on its own motion sets a Scheduling Conference for Wednesday, October 28, 2009, at 11:00 am. (lom) (Entered: 10/07/2009)
2009-09-03
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. of (1) Application to File Document Under Seal; (2) [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal; (3) Supplemental Declaration of Aleksander J. Goranin in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s & Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims with Exhibits LL-NN; (4) Proof of Service. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 09/04/2009)
2009-09-04
1
APPLICATION to File Document Under Seal filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., and Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. Lodged proposed order. (mg) (Entered: 09/09/2009)
2009-09-04
1
PROOF OF SERVICE of Application to File Under Seal Documents 173 ; [Proposed] Order to File Documents Under Seal; Supplmental Declaration of Aleksander J. Goranin and Exhibits LL Through MM Attached Thereto; filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. and Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.; served on 9/4/09. (mg) Modified on 9/9/2009 (mg). (Entered: 09/09/2009)
2009-09-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Supplemental Declaration of Aleksander J. Goranin in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Conter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims. (mat) (Entered: 09/09/2009)
2009-09-08
1
ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: ORDERED that Centocor's Application to File Under Seal 173 is GRANTED as follows: (1) Supplemental Declaration of Aleksander J. Goranin and Exhibits LL through MM attached thereto in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Defendants' TNF-Alpha Counterclaims; and (2) No persons other than the Court and counsel of record are authorized to inspect the above-listed records filed under seal. (gk) (Entered: 09/11/2009)
2009-09-08
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Order Denying Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment. (mat) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
2009-10-02
1
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Court, on its own motion, sets a Scheduling Conference for Wednesday, 10/28/2009, at 11:00 am. (kpa) (Entered: 10/07/2009)
2009-10-07
1
NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error, the Civil Minutes - In Chambers dated 9/3/2009 178, was docketed in error. The correct Minutes dated 10/7/2009 appear on the docket as document item number 179. (gk) (Entered: 10/07/2009)
2009-10-07
1
[Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order filed by Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 10/09/2009)
2009-10-09
1
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer : Stipulated Protective Order. 181 (pso) (Entered: 10/21/2009)
2009-10-20
1
Joint Proposed Schedule filed by Counter Claimants Genentech Inc, City of Hope, Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 10/26/2009)
2009-10-26
1
MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS (Note change in designation of motion hearing time) by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Please take notice that all civil motions set by the parties before the Honorable Mariana R. Pfaelzer from this date forward shall be scheduled for and heard on Mondays at 11:00 AM. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) (Entered: 10/28/2009)
2009-10-28
1
MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Court and counsel discuss various issues concerning pretrial matters, discovery and trial. The Court hereby sets the following dates: Last day to file motions 7/12/2010. Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment 8/17/2010, at 11:00 AM. Court Reporter: Lisa Gonzalez. (gk) (Entered: 10/30/2009)
2009-10-28
1
NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Keith Douglas Fraser counsel for Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. Amanda M. Kessel will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice.Amanda M. Kessel is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff / Counterclaimants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. et al. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 10/29/2009)
2009-10-29
1
[Proposed] Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Defendants Genentech Inc, City of Hope (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 11/05/2009)
2009-11-05
1
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The parties hereby jointly propose the following schedule: Close of Fact Discovery 4/30/2010; Parties to serve opening expert reports on issues on which they bear the burden of proof 5/14/2010; Parties to serve expert reports responding to opening expert reports 6/4/2010; Close of expert discovery 6/25/2010; Deadline to file summary judgment motions 7/12/2010; and Hearing on motions for summary judgment 8/17/2010. The foregoing proposed schedule is hereby approved, and shall govern the schedule of this case going forward, unless otherwise ordered by this Court. (gk) (Entered: 11/09/2009)
2009-11-06
1
NOTICE of Change of Address by Daralyn J Durie attorney for Defendant Genentech Inc, changing Address to 217 Leidesdorff Street, San Francisco, CA 94111. Filed by Defendant Genentech, Inc. (Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 12/18/2009)
2009-12-18
1
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: account information was not updated in the ECF system. Your account information must be updated immediately by going to Utilities - Maintain Your Address or Maintain Your E-mail Address RE: Notice of Change of Address 189 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (vh) (Entered: 12/18/2009)
2009-12-18
1
APPLICATION for attorney John Frank Murphy to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 09730000000006434634 paid.) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 01/22/2010)
2010-01-22
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 191 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney John F. Murphy on behalf of Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., designating Bruce G. Chapman as local counsel. (Fee Paid 1/22/10) (lom) (Entered: 01/27/2010)
2010-01-27
1
NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Keith Douglas Fraser counsel for Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. Changing DIANNE B. ELDERKIN'S Address and Firm Name to Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market St., Ste. 4100, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Changing Email, Telephone and Fax to DElderkin@akingump.com, Tel: (215) 265-1200, Fax: (215) 965-1210. Filed by on behalf of DIANNE B. ELDERKIN, counsel for Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, LLC, Centocor Biologics, LLC and JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
2010-02-19
1
NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Keith Douglas Fraser counsel for Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. Changing BARBARA J. MULLIN'S Address and Firm Name to Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market St., Ste. 4100, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Changing Email, Telephone and Fax to BMullin@akingump.com, Tel: (215) 265-1200, Fax: (215) 965-1210. Filed by on behalf of BARBARA J. MULLIN, counsel for Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, LLC, Centocor Biologics, LLC and JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
2010-02-19
1
NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Keith Douglas Fraser counsel for Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. Changing STEVEN D. MASLOWSKI'S Address and Firm Name to Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market St., Ste. 4100, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Changing Email, Telephone and Fax to SMaslowski@akingump.com, Tel: (215) 265-1200, Fax: (215) 965-1210. Filed by on behalf of STEVEN D. MASLOWSKI, counsel for Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, LLC, Centocor Biologics, LLC and JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
2010-02-19
1
NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Keith Douglas Fraser counsel for Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. Changing MATTHEW A. PEARSON'S Address and Firm Name to Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market St., Ste. 4100, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Changing Email, Telephone and Fax to MPearson@akingump.com, Tel: (215) 265-1200, Fax: (215) 965-1210. Filed by on behalf of MATTHEW A. PEARSON, counsel for Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, LLC, Centocor Biologics, LLC and JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
2010-02-19
1
APPLICATION for attorney ANGELA VERRECCHIO to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 0973-6590268 paid.) filed by Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
2010-02-26
1
APPLICATION for attorney ANGELA VERRECCHIO to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 0973-6590268 paid.) filed by Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
2010-02-26
2
APPLICATION for attorney ANGELA VERRECCHIO to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 0973-6590268 paid.) filed by Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
2010-02-26
2
APPLICATION for attorney RUBEN MUNOZ to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 0973-6590619 paid.) filed by Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
2010-02-26
1
APPLICATION for attorney RUBEN MUNOZ to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 0973-6590619 paid.) filed by Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
2010-02-26
2
APPLICATION for attorney RUBEN MUNOZ to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 0973-6590619 paid.) filed by Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, # 2 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 02/26/2010)
2010-02-26
2
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 198 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Ruben Munoz on behalf of Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., designating Bruce G. Chapman as local counsel. (Fee Paid 2/26/10) (lom) (Entered: 03/04/2010)
2010-03-03
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 197 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Angela Verrecchio on behalf of Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., designating Bruce G. Chapman as local counsel. (Fee Paid 2/26/10) (lom) (Entered: 03/04/2010)
2010-03-03
1
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Discovery Cut-Off Date to 8/13/2010 and Amend the Case Schedule filed by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Unopposed Ex Parte Application to Amend Case Schedule)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 03/22/2010)
2010-03-22
1
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Discovery Cut-Off Date to 8/13/2010 and Amend the Case Schedule filed by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Unopposed Ex Parte Application to Amend Case Schedule)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 03/22/2010)
2010-03-22
2
Amended EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Discovery Cut-Off Date to 5/28/2010 and Amend the Case Schedule filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Amended Unopposed Ex Parte Application to Amend Case Schedule)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/01/2010)
2010-04-01
1
Amended EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Discovery Cut-Off Date to 5/28/2010 and Amend the Case Schedule filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Amended Unopposed Ex Parte Application to Amend Case Schedule)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/01/2010)
2010-04-01
2
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: 202 Plaintiffs Centocor's Amended Ex Parte Application to Extend Discovery Cut-Off Date is DENIED. (lom) (Entered: 04/06/2010)
2010-04-05
1
Joint STIPULATION to Clarify Issues for Trial filed by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Genentech Inc.(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 04/08/2010)
2010-04-08
1
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Jeffrey Kushan After Discovery Cut-Off filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Deposition of Jeffrey Kushan After Discovery Cut-Off)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/27/2010)
2010-04-27
1
NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE due to Unavailability of Judicial Officer filed. The previously assigned Magistrate Judge is no longer available. Pursuant to directive of the Chief Magistrate Judge and in accordance with the rules of this Court, the case has been returned to the Clerk for reassignment. This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for any discovery and/or post-judgment matters that may be referred.. Case number will now read CV 08-03573 MRP(JEMx). (rn) (Entered: 04/28/2010)
2010-04-28
1
Defendant's Ex Parte Application for Protective Order Prohibiting the Deposition of Genentech Counsel Jeffrey Kushan; and OPPOSITION re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Jeffrey Kushan After Discovery Cut-Off 205 filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sernel, Marcus) Modified on 5/18/2010 (lom). (Entered: 04/28/2010)
2010-04-28
1
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Jeffrey Kushan After Discovery Cut-Off 205 ; Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order Prohibiting the Deposition of Genentech Counsel Jeffrey Kushan 207 filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 04/28/2010)
2010-04-28
1
DECLARATION of Marcus E. Sernel in Support of Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order Prohibiting the Deposition of Genentech Counsel Jeffrey Kushan 207 ; and Opposition to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Jeffrey Kushan After Discovery Cut-Off 205 filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 04/28/2010)
2010-04-28
1
DECLARATION of Marcus E. Sernel in Support of Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order Prohibiting the Deposition of Genentech Counsel Jeffrey Kushan 207 ; and Opposition to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Jeffrey Kushan After Discovery Cut-Off 205 filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 04/28/2010)
2010-04-28
2
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
2010-04-29
1
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
2010-04-29
2
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
2010-04-29
2
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
2010-04-29
2
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
2010-04-29
2
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
2010-04-29
2
MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
2010-04-29
2
REPLY in Support of Defendants' Ex Parte Application for Protective Order Prohibiting the Deposition of Genentech Counsel Jeffrey Kushan 207 ; and in Opposition to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Jeffrey Kushan After Discovery Cut-Off 205 filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
1
REPLY in Support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Jeffrey Kushan After Discovery Cut-Off 205 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. of (1) Plaintiff's Application to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information; (2) [Proposed] Order; and (3) Confidential Exhibits A and K In Support of Application to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Ex Parte Application. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
1
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
1
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Exhibit E, # 5 Exhibit F, # 6 Exhibit G, # 7 Exhibit H, # 8 Exhibit I, # 9 Exhibit J, # 10 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After Discovery Cut-Off Date filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After Discovery Cut-Off Date)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
1
EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After Discovery Cut-Off Date filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After Discovery Cut-Off Date)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
2010-04-30
2
APPLICATION to file Documents under seal in support of Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately withheld Information filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third-Party Defendants Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, Centocor Biologics LLC, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. Lodged [Prop] Order. (lom) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-04-30
1
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. correcting EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After Discovery Cut-Off Date 215 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
2010-05-03
1
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. correcting EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After Discovery Cut-Off Date 215 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
2010-05-03
2
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. correcting EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After Discovery Cut-Off Date 215 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
2010-05-03
2
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. correcting EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After Discovery Cut-Off Date 215 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
2010-05-03
2
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. correcting EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After Discovery Cut-Off Date 215 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
2010-05-03
2
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Genentech Inc, Counter Claimant Genentech Inc of Sealed Opposition to Ex Parte Application and Exhibits. (Attachments: # 1 List of Documents)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-05
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Genentech Inc, Counter Claimant Genentech Inc of Sealed Opposition to Ex Parte Application and Exhibits. (Attachments: # 1 List of Documents)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-05
2
DECLARATION of Aaron M. Nathan in Support of Opposition EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information 214 filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit F, # 2 Exhibit G, # 3 Exhibit H, # 4 Exhibit I)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-05
1
DECLARATION of Aaron M. Nathan in Support of Opposition EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information 214 filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit F, # 2 Exhibit G, # 3 Exhibit H, # 4 Exhibit I)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-05
2
DECLARATION of Aaron M. Nathan in Support of Opposition EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information 214 filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit F, # 2 Exhibit G, # 3 Exhibit H, # 4 Exhibit I)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-05
2
DECLARATION of Aaron M. Nathan in Support of Opposition EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information 214 filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit F, # 2 Exhibit G, # 3 Exhibit H, # 4 Exhibit I)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-05
2
DECLARATION of Aaron M. Nathan in Support of Opposition EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information 214 filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit F, # 2 Exhibit G, # 3 Exhibit H, # 4 Exhibit I)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-05
2
Corrected NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc of Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Corrected Attachment)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-05
1
Corrected NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc of Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Corrected Attachment)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
2010-05-05
2
APPLICATION to File Under Seal Documents in support of Genetech, Inc and City of Hope's Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately withheld Information filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. Lodged [Prop] Order. (lom) (Entered: 05/07/2010)
2010-05-05
1
REPLY in support EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information 214 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 05/06/2010)
2010-05-06
1
REPLY in support EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information 214 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 05/06/2010)
2010-05-06
2
REPLY in support EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information 214 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 05/06/2010)
2010-05-06
2
ORDER granting 217 Centocor's Application for Order to File Under Seal by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer as follows: Exhibit A: Portion of the Deposition Transcript of Schmuel Cabilly, PhD. Date April 9, 2010; and Exhibit K: Rebuttal Expert Report of Mark X. Sliwkoski, Ph.D. in the case of Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc. date January 28, 2002. No persons other than the Court and counsel of record are authorized to inspect the above-listed records filed under seal. (lom) (Entered: 05/10/2010)
2010-05-06
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 222 Defendants' Application to File Under Seal as follows: 1. Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information; 2. Exhibits A, B, C, D, E and J to the Declaration of Aaron M. Nathan in Support of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information be filed under seal; and 3. No persons other than the Court and counsel of record are authorized to inspect the above-listed records filed under seal. (lom) (Entered: 05/10/2010)
2010-05-06
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Opposition to Plaintiff's Exparte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately withheld Information.(mat) (Entered: 05/10/2010)
2010-05-06
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Confidential Exhibits A, B, C, D, E and J to Declaration of Aaron M. Nathan in Support of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Opposition to Plaintiff's Exparte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5)(mat) (Entered: 05/10/2010)
2010-05-06
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Confidential Exhibits A and K to Plaintiff's Exparte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information.(mat) (Entered: 05/10/2010)
2010-05-06
1
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: 1. Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Jeffrey Kushan After the Discovery Cut-off Date 205 is GRANTED as follows: In the event the D.C. District Court orders that the deposition of Jeffrey Kushan go forward, this Court GRANTS Centocor leave to take his deposition after the Discovery Cut-off Date of April 30, 2010. Defendants' Application for Protective Order Prohibiting the Deposition of Genentech Counsel Jeffrey Kushan 207 is DENIED. 2. Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Take Deposition of Witness Sharon Crane After the Discovery Cut-off Date 215 is GRANTED as follows: Centocor is given leave to take the deposition of Sharon Crane after the Discovery Cutoff Date of April 30, 2010. 3. Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information 214 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. Defendants are required to produce the fourth document related to the December 13, 1999 Email for the Court's in camera review. The Court will rule on whether the document is subject to attorney-client privilege. b. Defendants are not required to provide the requested log of all documents withheld as privileged. c. Defendants are not required to produce further materials related to the Chiron v. Genentech litigation. (lom) (Entered: 05/18/2010)
2010-05-17
1
NOTICE OF LODGING filed of Document For In Camera Review re Order on Ex Parte Application for Leave re Discovery Matter, Order on Motion for Protective Order, Order on Ex Parte Application to Compel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 228 (Lipner, Joseph) (Entered: 05/26/2010)
2010-05-26
1
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The Court has reviewed the document lodged by Defendants for the Court's in camera review associated with Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information. Docket No. 229 . The Court ORDERS that the document is not subject to attorney-client privilege and must be disclosed to Plaintiffs. Plaintiff's Application to Compel Disclosure of Inappropriately Withheld Information is GRANTED in part 214 . (lom) (Entered: 06/07/2010)
2010-06-01
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION to Amend Protective Order 182 filed by Joint Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/19/2010 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 2 Declaration Sernel Declaration for Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B - C Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit D - F)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
2010-06-28
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION to Amend Protective Order 182 filed by Joint Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/19/2010 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 2 Declaration Sernel Declaration for Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B - C Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit D - F)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
2010-06-28
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION to Amend Protective Order 182 filed by Joint Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/19/2010 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 2 Declaration Sernel Declaration for Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B - C Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit D - F)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
2010-06-28
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION to Amend Protective Order 182 filed by Joint Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/19/2010 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 2 Declaration Sernel Declaration for Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B - C Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit D - F)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
2010-06-28
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION to Amend Protective Order 182 filed by Joint Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/19/2010 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 2 Declaration Sernel Declaration for Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B - C Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit D - F)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
2010-06-28
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION to Amend Protective Order 182 filed by Joint Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/19/2010 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 2 Declaration Sernel Declaration for Joint Stipulation re Motion to Amend Stipulated Protective Order, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B - C Under Seal, # 5 Exhibit D - F)(Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 06/28/2010)
2010-06-28
2
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Genentech Inc of (1) Declaration of Marcus E. Sernel in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Joint Stipulation Regarding Defendant Genentech, Inc.'s Motion to Amend the Stipulated Protective Order; (2) Application to File Under Seal; (3) [Proposed] Order Granting Application to File Under Seal. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 06/29/2010)
2010-06-29
1
EX PARTE APPLICATION to file under seal the Declaration of Marcus E. Sernel in support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Joint Stipulation Regarding Defendant Genentech, Inc.'s Motion to Amend the Stipulated Protective Order and its attached exhibits B and C. Specifically, Genentech requests that the following exhibits be filed under seal: 1. Exhibit B: A 2001 Agreement between Genentech and Celltech, Bates labeled GNE-MED 00487 - GNE-MED 00518; 2. Exhibit C: A June 2, 2010 letter from Genentech to Celltech filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. Lodged [Prop] Order.(lom) (Entered: 06/30/2010)
2010-06-29
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 233 Genentech, Inc's Ex Parte Application to file under seal the Declaration of Marcus E. Sernel in support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Joint Stipulation Regarding Defendant Genentech, Inc.'s Motion to Amend the Stipulated Protective Order, and exhibits B and C. (lom) (Entered: 07/01/2010)
2010-06-30
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Marcus E. Sernel in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Joint Stipulation Regarding Defendant Genentech Inc.'s Motion to Amend the Stipulated Protective Order. (mat) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/1/2010: Part 2) (mat). (Entered: 07/01/2010)
2010-06-30
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Genentech Inc of 1) Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Genentech's Motion to Amend the Protective Order; (2) Declaration of Marcus E.Sernel in Support of Genentech's Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion to Amend Protective Order; (3) Application to File Under Seal, (4) Proposed Order Granting Application to File Under Seal. (Sernel, Marcus) (Entered: 07/02/2010)
2010-07-02
1
APPLICATION for Leave to File under seal documents in support of Genentech Inc's supplemental Memorandum in support to Genetech's Motion to Amend Protective Order: 1. Genentech, Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Genentech's Motion to Amend Protective Order; 2. Correspondence between Alex Goranin, Esq., counsel for Centocor and Marc E. Semel, Esq., counsel for Genentech; 3. a May 20, 2010 letter from Hannah S. Williams, Esq., of Genentech to Dr. Phillip Ansell of Celltech; and 4. a June 17, 2010 letter from Hannah S. Williams, Esq., of Genentech to Mr. Allen Norris of Celltech filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. Lodged [Prop] Order. (lom) (Entered: 07/07/2010)
2010-07-02
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Marcus E. Sernel in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Genentech's Motion to Amend Protective Order.(mat) (Entered: 07/09/2010)
2010-07-07
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Supplemental Memorandum in Support Genentech's Motion to Amend the Protective Order. (mat) (Entered: 07/09/2010)
2010-07-07
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 237 Genentech, Inc's Application to file documents under seal. It is therefore ORDERED that: 1. Genentech, Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Genentech's Motion to Amend Protective Order be filed under seal; and 2. Declaration of Marcus E. Sernel in Support of Genentech, Inc.' s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Genentech's Motion to Amend Protective Order and exhibits A-C be filed under seal. (lom) (Entered: 07/09/2010)
2010-07-07
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc of Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony; supporting Durie Declaration and exhibits. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachment to Notice of Manual Filing)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc of Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony; supporting Durie Declaration and exhibits. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachment to Notice of Manual Filing)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony filed by Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2010 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony filed by Defendants and Counter-Plaintiffs City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2010 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. of (1) 8 Ex Parte Applications to File Under Seal Documents in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment and Motion for Claim Constructio and Proposed Orders; (2) Memorandum in Support of Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment Nos. 1, 3-6, Motion for Construction of Claim Term, Declaration of Matthew Pearson; Confidential Exhibits 16-19, 22-25, 27-28, 32, 34, 35-36 and 39. (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Re Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Re Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin")(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin")(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order of Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order of Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendant Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendant Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Summary Judgment of Anticipation)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Summary Judgment of Anticipation)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Summary Judgment that Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) filed by Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order for Summary Judgment that Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
1
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 20, # 17 Exhibit 21, # 18 Exhibit 26, # 19 Exhibit 29, # 20 Exhibit 30, # 21 Exhibit 31, # 22 Exhibit 33, # 23 Exhibit 37, # 24 Exhibit 38, # 25 Exhibit 40, # 26 Exhibit 41, # 27 Exhibit 42, # 28 Exhibit 43, # 29 Exhibit 44, # 30 Exhibit 45, # 31 Exhibit 46)(Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/12/2010)
2010-07-12
2
APPLICATION to file under seal document the following documents in support of Genentech, Inc and City of Hope's Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall: 1. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall; 2. Declaration of Daralyn J. Durie in Support of Defendant Genentech, Inc. and City ofHope's Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall, with the exhibits set forth below: 3. Exhibit A to Durie Declaration: Expert Report of Randolph Wall, Ph.D., designated confidential pursuant to the protective order herein; 4. Exhibit B to Durie Declaration: Responsive Expert Report of Randolph Wall, Ph.D., designated confidential pursuant to the protective order herein; and 5. Exhibit C to Durie Declaration: Transcript of June 11, 2010 deposition of Randolph Wall, Ph.D., designated confidential pursuant to the protective order herein filed by Defendant City of Hope. Lodged [Prop] Order. (lom) (Entered: 07/13/2010)
2010-07-12
1
NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. correcting MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 (Fraser, Keith) (Entered: 07/13/2010)
2010-07-13
1
APPLICATION to file under seal : 1. Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No.6) ("Memorandum"); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No.6) ("Statement of Undisputed Facts") filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-13
1
APPLICATION to file under seal : 1. Declaration of Matthew Pearson in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motions for Summary Judgment and Motion For Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (Motion Nos. 1-6) ("Declaration") filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-13
1
APPLICATION to file under seal: 1. Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No.1) ("Memorandum"); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No. 1) ("Statement of Undisputed Facts") filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-13
1
APPLICATION for Leave to file the following Exhibits to the Declaration of Matthew Pearson in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motions for Summary Judgment and Motion for Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (Motion Nos. 1-6) under seal: 1. Exhibit 16: Expert Report of Randolph Wall, Ph.D.; 2. Exhibit 17: Expert Report of Arne Skerra, Ph.D.; 3. Exhibit 18: Expert Report ofEugene Rzucidlo; 4. Exhibit 19: Responsive Expert Report of Randolph Wall, Ph.D.; 5. Exhibit 22: Portions of Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Kushan; 6. Exhibit 23: Portions ofDeposition Transcript of Bruce Dolnick, Ph.D.; 7. Exhibit 24: Expert Report of Matthew P. Scott, Ph.D.; 8. Exhibit 25: Opening Expert Report of George H. Kidd, PhD.; 9. Exhibit 27: Expert Report of Bruce Dolnick, Ph.D.; 10. Exhibit 28: Portions of Deposition Transcript of Matthew Peter Scott, Ph.D. dated June 15, 2010; 11. Exhibit 32: Portions of Deposition Transcript of Robert B. Freedman dated June 22, 2010; 12. Exhibit 34: Portions of Deposition Transcript of Carlo M. Croce, M.D. dated July 8, 2010; 13. Exhibit 35: Portions of Laboratory Notebook, Genentech Inc.; 14. Exhibit 36: Portions of Deposition Transcript of Ronald Wetzel dated January 28, 2010; and 15. Exhibit 39: Portions of Deposition Transcript of George H. Kidd dated June 17, 2010 filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-13
1
APPLICATION to file under seal: 1. Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion For Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (Motion No.2) ("Memorandum") filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-13
1
APPLICATION to file under seal: 1. Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No.3) ("Memorandum"); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No.3) ("Statement of Undisputed Facts") filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-13
1
APPLICATION to file under seal: 1. Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Of Claim 33 For Failure To Comply With 35 U.S.C. § 112 (Motion No.4) ("Memorandum"); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Of Claim 33 for Failure To Comply With 35 U.S.C. § 112 (Motion No.4) ("Statement of Undisputed Facts") filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-13
1
APPLICATION to file under seal : 1. Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No.5) ("Memorandum"); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No.5) ("Statement of Undisputed Facts") filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-13
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Order to file under seal: 1. Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No.1); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No. 1). (mat) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-13
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Matthew A. Pearson in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motions for Summary Judgment and Motion for Construction of Claim Term Immunoglobulin. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11)(mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates Motion for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6).(mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment- (Motion No. 5) (mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) (mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc's and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 US 112 (Motion no.4) (mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4)(mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of No. Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No. 3). (mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3).(mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Construction of Claim Term Immunoglobulin (Motion No. 2). (mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement. (Motion No. 1). (mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No. 1).(mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates Motion for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6)(mat) (Entered: 07/19/2010)
2010-07-14
1
ORDER to file under seal by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. It is hereby Ordered that Defendants' Application 251 to file under seal document is granted as follows: 1. Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall; 2. Declaration of Daralyn J. Durie in Support of Defendant Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall, with the exhibits A, B, and C thereto shall be filed under seal. (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-14
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 273 Application to file under seal: 1. Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No. 5); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No. 5). (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-14
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 272 Application to file under seal: 1. Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Of Claim 33 For Failure To Comply With 35 U.S.C. § 112 (Motion No.4); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Of Claim 33 for Failure To Comply With 35 U.S.C. § 112 (Motion No.4). (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-14
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 271 Application to file under seal: 1. Memorandum in Support Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No. 3); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No. 3). (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-14
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 270 Application to file under seal: Memorandum in Support of Centocor Ortho BioTech, Inc. and its Cross Defendant Affiliates' Motion For Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (Motion No. 2). (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-14
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 266 Application to file under seal: 1. Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No. 6); and 2. Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No. 6). (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-14
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 267 Application to file under seal: 1. Declaration of Matthew Pearson in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment and Motion For Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (Motion Nos. 1-6). (lom) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Will. (mat) Modified on 8/3/2010 (mat). (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-14
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Daralyn J. Durie in Support of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4)(mat) (Entered: 07/20/2010)
2010-07-14
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 269 Centocor's Application to file under Seal: 1. Confidential Exhibits In Support OfMotions For Summary Judgment And Motion For Construction Of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (Motion Nos. 1-6). (lom) (Entered: 07/21/2010)
2010-07-14
1
MINUTES OF DEFENDANT GENENTECH, INC.'S MOTION TO AMEND THE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 231 (fld 6/28/10) Hearing held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. Court and counsel discuss the motion. The Court takes the motion under submission and its order will follow. Court Reporter: Margaret Babykin. (lom) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-19
1
BRIEF filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Request for Extension of Time to File Proposed Order Relating to July 19 Hearing (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Pals, Mark) Modified on 7/28/2010 (lom). (Entered: 07/23/2010)
2010-07-23
1
BRIEF filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Request for Extension of Time to File Proposed Order Relating to July 19 Hearing (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Pals, Mark) Modified on 7/28/2010 (lom). (Entered: 07/23/2010)
2010-07-23
2
NOTICE of Filing of [Proposed] Order Amending the October 20, 2009 Stipulated Protective Order filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Amending the October 20, 2009 Stipulated Protective Order)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/26/2010)
2010-07-26
1
NOTICE of Filing of [Proposed] Order Amending the October 20, 2009 Stipulated Protective Order filed by Defendant Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Amending the October 20, 2009 Stipulated Protective Order)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/26/2010)
2010-07-26
2
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc of 1. Application to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Genentech, Inc.s and City of Hopes Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.s Motion Nos. 1-6; 2. [Proposed] Order Granting Genentech, Inc.s and City of Hopes Application to File Documents Under Seal; 3. Opposition By Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope To Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.s and Its Counter-Defendant Affiliates Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No. 1); 4.Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Genentech, Inc.s and City of Hopes Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No. 1); 5. Opposition of Genentech, Inc. & City of Hope to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.s Motion for Construction of Claim Term Immunoglobulin (Motion No. 2); 6. Cross Motion for Summary Judgment Adjudication and Opposition of Genentech, Inc. & City of Hope to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No. 3); 7. Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Genentech, Inc.s and City of Hopes Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No. 3); 8. Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Genentech, Inc.s and City of Hopes Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication; 9. Genentech, Inc. and City of Hopes Opposition to Centocors Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. § 112 (Motion No. 4); 10. Response of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope to Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law In Support Of Centocors Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. § 112 (Motion No. 4); 11. Opposition by Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.s and Its Counter-Defendant Affiliates Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No. 5); 12. Statement of Genuine Issues In Support of Genentech, Inc.s and City of Hopes Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.s Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No. 5); 13. Genentech, Inc. and City of Hopes Opposition to Centocor Inc.s Motion for Summary Judgment That Claim 33 Is Invalid for Failure to Disclose The Best Mode (Motion No. 6); 14. Response of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope to Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law In Support Of Centocors Motion for Summary Judgment That Claim 33 Is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No. 6); 15. Declaration of Mark A. Pals In Support of Genentech, Inc.s and City of Hopes Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Pals Declaration); 16. Exhibits B-M, O-R, W, Z-BB, EE-JJ, LL-NN, QQ-TT, WW to the Pals Declaration; 17. Proof of Service. (Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. of (1) Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall; (2) Declaration of Angela Verrecchio in Support of Centocor's Opposition to Defendants' Motion & Confidential Exhibits 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 15 and 16; and (3) Proof of Service. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
1
Second NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. of 1) Application to File Docs Under Seal; (2) [Proposed] Order; (3) Centocor's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall; (4) Decl. of Angela Verrecchio in Support of Centocor's Opposition to Defendants' Motion & Confidential Exhibits 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 15 and 16; and (5) Proof of Service. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
1
DECLARATION of Angela Verrecchio In Opposition to MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony 242 Non-Confidential Exhibits 3, 4, 7 and 10-14 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibit 12, # 7 Exhibit 13, # 8 Exhibit 14)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
1
DECLARATION of Angela Verrecchio In Opposition to MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony 242 Non-Confidential Exhibits 3, 4, 7 and 10-14 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibit 12, # 7 Exhibit 13, # 8 Exhibit 14)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
DECLARATION of Angela Verrecchio In Opposition to MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony 242 Non-Confidential Exhibits 3, 4, 7 and 10-14 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibit 12, # 7 Exhibit 13, # 8 Exhibit 14)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
DECLARATION of Angela Verrecchio In Opposition to MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony 242 Non-Confidential Exhibits 3, 4, 7 and 10-14 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibit 12, # 7 Exhibit 13, # 8 Exhibit 14)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
DECLARATION of Angela Verrecchio In Opposition to MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony 242 Non-Confidential Exhibits 3, 4, 7 and 10-14 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibit 12, # 7 Exhibit 13, # 8 Exhibit 14)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
DECLARATION of Angela Verrecchio In Opposition to MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony 242 Non-Confidential Exhibits 3, 4, 7 and 10-14 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibit 12, # 7 Exhibit 13, # 8 Exhibit 14)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
DECLARATION of Angela Verrecchio In Opposition to MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony 242 Non-Confidential Exhibits 3, 4, 7 and 10-14 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibit 12, # 7 Exhibit 13, # 8 Exhibit 14)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
DECLARATION of Angela Verrecchio In Opposition to MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony 242 Non-Confidential Exhibits 3, 4, 7 and 10-14 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibit 12, # 7 Exhibit 13, # 8 Exhibit 14)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
DECLARATION of Angela Verrecchio In Opposition to MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony 242 Non-Confidential Exhibits 3, 4, 7 and 10-14 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3, # 2 Exhibit 4, # 3 Exhibit 7, # 4 Exhibit 10, # 5 Exhibit 11, # 6 Exhibit 12, # 7 Exhibit 13, # 8 Exhibit 14)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
NOTICE of Motion in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication)(Pals, Mark) Modified on 8/6/2010 (lom). (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
1
NOTICE of Motion in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication)(Pals, Mark) Modified on 8/6/2010 (lom). (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
1
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Exhibits A, N, S Through V, X, Y, CC, DD, KK, OO, PP, UU and VV Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit N, # 3 Exhibit S, # 4 Exhibit T, # 5 Exhibit U, # 6 Exhibit V, # 7 Exhibit X, # 8 Exhibit Y, # 9 Exhibit CC, # 10 Exhibit DD, # 11 Exhibit KK, # 12 Exhibit OO, # 13 Exhibit PP, # 14 Exhibit UU, # 15 Exhibit VV)(Pals, Mark) (Entered: 07/27/2010)
2010-07-27
2
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 284 Genentech Inc.'s Request for Extension of Time to File Proposed Order. It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Genentech, Inc. shall have until July 27, 2010 to file the proposed order effecting the amendment to the Stipulated Protective Order discussed at the July 19, 2010 hearing on Genentech's Motion to Amend the Stipulated Protective Order. (lom) (Entered: 07/28/2010)
2010-07-27
1
APPLICATION to file under seal documents: 1. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-defendant Affiliates' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall; 2. Declaration of Angela Verrecchio In Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. 's and its Counter-defendant Affiliates' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall, with the exhibits set forth below: 3. Exhibit 1: Expert Report of Randolph Wall, Ph.D.; 4. Exhibit 2: Portions ofthe Deposition Testimony of Randolph Wall, Ph.D.; 5. Exhibit 5: Portions of the Deposition Testimony of George H. Kidd, Ph.D.; 6. Exhibit 6: Portions ofthe Deposition Testimony of Matthew Scott, Ph.D.; 7. Exhibit 8: Portions of the Deposition Testimony of Arthur Riggs, Ph.D.; 8. Exhibit 9: Responsive Expert Report of Randolph Wall, Ph.D.; 9. Exhibit 15: Portions ofthe Deposition Testimony of Bruce Dolnick, Ph.D.; 10. Exhibit 16: Portions of the Deposition Testimony of Robert Freedman filed by Plaintiff Centocor Biologics LLC, and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. Lodged [Prop] Order. (lom) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
2010-07-27
1
APPLICATION to file documents under seal in support of Genentech, Inc's and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc's Motion nos. 1-6 filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Lodged [Prop] Order. (lom) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
2010-07-27
1
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, re APPLICATION for Leave to File file under seal 295, see list 1-17; served on 7/27/10 by Fedex and e-mail. (lom) (Entered: 07/29/2010)
2010-07-27
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., re APPLICATION for Leave to File under seal documents 294 ; [Prop] Order; Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall; and Declaration of Angela Verrecchio, etc, served by hand delivery, US Mail and e-mail on 7/27/10. (lom) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-27
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and Its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Will. (mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-27
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Angela Verrecchio in Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter- Defenant Affiliates' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall. (mat) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/3/2010: Part 2, Part 3) (mat). Modified on 8/3/2010 (mat). (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-27
1
ORDER AMENDING THE 10/20/2009 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Upon Genentech Inc.'s Motion to Amend the Stipulated Protective Order 231, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Protective Order entered by this Court in this matter on 10/20/2009 182 is hereby amended to incorporate Paragraph 26. See document for details. (gk) (Entered: 07/28/2010)
2010-07-28
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 294 Plaintiff's Application to file under seal: 1. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-defendant Affiliates' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall; 2. Declaration of Angela Verrecchio In Support of Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-defendant Affiliates' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall and exhibits 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 15, and 16 thereto shall be filed under seal. (lom) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Opposition to Centocor Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) (mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition of Genetech, Inc. and City of Hope to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No. 3). (mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5)(mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Genetech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) (mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Opposition by Genentech, Inc. and City of HOpe to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment (Motion No. 1) (mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross-Motion for Summary Adjudication. (mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Genetech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of No. Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No. 3)(mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Opposition of Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Construction of Claim Term Immunoglobulin (Motion No. 2)(mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Opposition by Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No. 5)(mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Response of Defenants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope to Statemnt of Undisputed Factsd and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor's Motion in Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 USC 112 (Motion No. 4)(mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Response of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope to Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No. 6)(mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and ?City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos 1-6). (mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Opposition to Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 USC 112 (Motion No. 4)(mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibits AA-BB, EE-JJ, LL-NN, QQ-TT, and WW Attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos 1-6) (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12, Part 13, Part 14, Part 15, Part 16)(mat) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-07-28
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 295 Genentech, Inc's and City of Hope's Application to file under seal: 1. Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and Its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No.1); 2. The Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No.1); 3. The Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (Motion No.2); 4. The Cross Motion for Summary Judgment Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No.3); 5. The Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No.3); 6. The Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication; 7. Opposition to Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply (Motion No.4); 8. The Response to Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support Of Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply (Motion No.4); 9. Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and Its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No.5); 10. The Statement of Genuine Issues in Support of Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No.5); 11. Opposition to Centocor Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment that Claim 33 Is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No.6); 12. The Response to Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law In Support of Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment That Claim 33 Is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No.6); 13. The Declaration of Mark A. Pals In Support of Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) ("Pals Declaration"); and 14. Exhibits B-M, O-R, W, Z-BB, EE-JJ, LL-NN, QQ-TT, WW to the Pals Declaration. (lom) (Entered: 08/04/2010)
2010-07-28
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- EXHIBITS B-M, O-R, and W-Z attached to Declaration of Mark A. Pals in Support of Genentech, Inc.'s and City of Hope's Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication and Opposition to Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment and Claim Construction (Nos. 1-6) (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12, Part 13)(mat) (Entered: 08/04/2010)
2010-07-29
1
REQUEST to Substitute attorney Daralyn J. Durie in place of attorney David J. Silbert filed by Defendant and Cross-complainant Genentech Inc. (Silbert, David) (Entered: 07/30/2010)
2010-07-30
1
REQUEST for Order for Approval of Substitution of Attorney filed by Defendant and Cross-complainant Genentech Inc. (Silbert, David) (Entered: 07/30/2010)
2010-07-30
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 297 Request to Substitute Attorney Daralyn J Durie as attorney of record for Defendant Genentech, Inc., in place and stead of David J. Silbert of Keker & Van Nest LLP. (lom) (Entered: 08/02/2010)
2010-07-30
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc of Application to File Under Seal Documents in Support of Defendants' Reply Papers in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony; [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal; Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony; Declaration of Daralyn J. Durie in Support of Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony with Exhibits A and B; Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachment to Notice of Manual Filing, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-08-03
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc of Application to File Under Seal Documents in Support of Defendants' Reply Papers in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony; [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal; Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony; Declaration of Daralyn J. Durie in Support of Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony with Exhibits A and B; Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachment to Notice of Manual Filing, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-08-03
2
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimants City of Hope, Genentech Inc, Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc of Application to File Under Seal Documents in Support of Defendants' Reply Papers in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony; [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal; Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony; Declaration of Daralyn J. Durie in Support of Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Wall Testimony with Exhibits A and B; Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachment to Notice of Manual Filing, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-08-03
2
REPLY In Support Of MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245 filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Elderkin, Dianne) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-08-03
1
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. of (1) APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO RELATING TO CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC. AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CLAIM TERM AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; (2) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS RELATING TO RELATING TO CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC. AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CLAIM TERM AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; (3) CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT (MOTION NO. 1); (4) CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF CENTOCORS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT (MOTION NO. 1); (5) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC. AND ITS CROSS DEFENDANT AFFILIATES MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INFRINGEMENT OF CLAIM 33 (MOTION NO. 3) AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; (6) RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF CENTOCORS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INFRINGEMENT OF CLAIM 33 (MOTION NO. 3) AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; (7) CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF CLAIM 33 FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 35 USC § 112 (MOTION NO. 4); (8) CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF CENTOCORS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF CLAIM 33 FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 35 USC § 112 (MOTION NO. 4); (9) CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ANTICIPATION (MOTION NO. 5); (10) CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF CENTOCORS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ANTICIPATION (MOTION NO. 5); (11) CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT CLAIM 33 IS INVALID FOR FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THE BEST MODE (MOTION NO. 6); (12) CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF CENTOCORS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT CLAIM 33 IS INVALID FOR FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THE BEST MODE (MOTION NO. 6); (13) SECOND DECLARATION OF MATTHEW A. PEARSON IN SUPPORT OF CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.'S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES' REPLIES TO THEIR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, MOTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CLAIM TERM IMMULOGLOBULIN AND RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; (14) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-08-03
1
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson in Support of Replies in Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249 and Response to Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 50, # 2 Exhibit 53)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-08-03
1
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson in Support of Replies in Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249 and Response to Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 50, # 2 Exhibit 53)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-08-03
2
DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson in Support of Replies in Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (MOTION NO. 1) 244, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3) 246, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 U.S.C. Section 112 (MOTION NO. 4) 247, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Anticipation (MOTION NO. 5) 248, MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) MOTION for Summary Adjudication as to Construction of Claim Term "Immunoglobulin" (MOTION NO. 2) 245, MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Dislcose the Best Mode (MOTION NO. 6) 249 and Response to Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by Third Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., Counter Defendant Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 50, # 2 Exhibit 53)(Chapman, Bruce) (Entered: 08/03/2010)
2010-08-03
2
APPLICATION to file under seal documents: 1. Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No. 1); 2. Response to Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Willful Infringement (Motion No. 1); 3. Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No. 3) and Response to Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication; 4. Response to Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts and Conclusions of Law in Support of Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of Claim 33 (Motion No. 3) and Response to Defendants' Statement of Facts in Support of Their Cross Motion for Summary Adjudication; 5. Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to Comply with 35 USC § 112 (Motion No. 4); 6. Response to Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support ofCentocor's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 forFailure to Comply with 35 USC § 112 (Motion No. 4); 7. Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Anticipation (Motion No. 5); 8. Response to Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment of 'Anticipation (Motion No. 5); 9. Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment That Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No. 6); 10. Response to Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support ofCentocor's Motion for Summary Judgment That Claim 33 is Invalid forFailure to Disclose the Best Mode (Motion No.6); 11. Second Declaration of Matthew A. Pearson In Support of Replies to Motions For Summary Judgment, Motion For Construction OfClaim Term "Immuloglobulin" and Response To Defendants' CrossMotion For Summary Adjudication; 12-16. Exhibits 47 to 52 filed by Plaintiff Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. and Third-Party Defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. Lodged [Prop] Order. (lom) (Entered: 08/05/2010)
2010-08-03
1
APPLICATION to file under seal documents in support of Defendants' Reply Papers in support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall: 1. Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall; 2. Declaration of Daralyn J. Durie in Support of Defendant Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall, with the exhibits set forth below: 3. Exhibit A to Durie Declaration: Transcript of the deposition of George H. Kidd, Ph.D., dated June 17, 2010; and 4. Exhibit B to Durie Declaration: Expert Report ofCarlo M. Croce, M.D., dated June 4, 2010 filed by Defendants City of Hope, Genentech Inc. Lodged [Prop] Order. (lom) (Entered: 08/05/2010)
2010-08-03
1
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff, counter defendants and 3rd party defendants Centocor Biologics LLC, Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc., Global Pharmaceutical Supply Group, JOM Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., re APPLICATION for Leave to File under seal 326, Reply (Motion related), Reply (Motion related) 314, Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 315, APPLICATION for Leave to File to file under seal 325, Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related) 322 served on 8/3/2010. (shb) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-03
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH INC'S And its Counter Defendant Affiliates' REPLY In Support of Their MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Willful Infringement (lra) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
2010-08-04
1
Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' REPLY In support of Their MOTION for Summary Judgment as to No Infringement of Claim 33 (MOTION NO. 3)(lra) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - SECOND DECLARATION of Matthew A. Pearson In support of CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH INC.'S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES' replies to Their MOTIONS for Summary Judgment or Construction of Claim Term"Immuloglobulin" and Response to Defendants' Cross Motion for summary Adjudication with Confidential Exhibits 47-49,51,52 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Declaration)(lra) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
2010-08-04
1
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by DEFENDANT Genentech Inc, served on AUGUST 3, 2010. (lra) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of Daralyn J Durie In support of Defendants Genentech Inc. and City of Hope's Reply memorandum in Support of Motion to Preclude or Strike Testimony of Dr. Wall (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Declaration, # 4 Declaration, # 5 Declaration, # 6 Declaration)(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 325 Application for Leave to File Documents Under Seal. (shb) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting 326 Application for Leave to File Documents Under Seal. (shb) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Response to Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts in support of Centocor's Motion for Summary Judgment or No Infringment of Claim 33 and Their Response to Defendant's Statement of Facts in Support of Defendants' Cross Motion for summary Adjudication( Motion No 3)(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' reply in support of Their Motion for summary judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to comply with 35 U.S.C section 112(motion No. 4)(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates Response to Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Facts In Support of Centocor's Motion for summary judgment of Invalidity of Claim 33 for Failure to comply with 35 U.S.C section 112(motion No 4)(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Response to Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts in support of Centocors' Motion for summary judgment of Anticipation (motion No. 5)(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Reply in support of Their Motion for summary judgment of Anticipation (motion No. 5)(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES In support of Defendants Genetech Inc. and City of Hope's MOTION to Strike Wall Testimony(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - Centocors Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Reply in support of Their Motion for summary Judgment That Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode(motion No. 6)(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - Centocors Ortho Biotech, Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Response in support of Their Motion for summary Judgment That Claim 33 is Invalid for Failure to Disclose the Best Mode(motion No. 6(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
SEALED DOCUMENT - Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc.'s and its Counter-Defendant Affiliates' Response to Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Facts in support of Centocor's Motion for summary judgment of No Willful Infringement(motion No. 1)(lra) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
2010-08-04
1
MINUTES OF MOTION(S) HEARING (held and completed) before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer; re 1. DEFENDANTS GENENTECH, INC AND CITY OF HOPE'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE OR STRIKE TESTIMONY OF DR. WALL 242 ; 2. CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.'S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT (MOTION #1) 244 ; 3. CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.'S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES' MOTION FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OF CLAIM TERM "IMMUNOGLOBULIN"(MOTION #2) 245 ; 4. CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.'S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INFRINGEMENT OF CLAIM 33(MOTION #3) 246 ; 5. CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.'S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ANTICIPATION(MOTION #4) 247 ; 6. CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.'S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF ANTICIPATION (MOTION #5) 248 ; 7. CENTOCOR ORTHO BIOTECH, INC.'S AND ITS COUNTER-DEFENDANT AFFILIATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT CLAIM 33 IS INVALID FOR FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THE BEST MODE (MOTION #6) 249 ; and 8. GENENTECH, INC.'S AND CITY OF HOPE'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 290 . Court and counsel discuss the motion(s). The Court takes the motion(s) under submission and its order will follow. Court Reporter: Bridget Montero. (lom) (Entered: 08/18/2010)
2010-08-17
1
STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff Genentech Inc.(Durie, Daralyn) (Entered: 08/30/2010)
2010-08-30
1
ORDER granting Stipulation 345 by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The above-captioned action (including without limitation all claims and counterclaims asserted in the action) is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; 2. All pending motions are deemed withdrawn and moot; and 3. Each party shall bear its own legal expenses, including without limitation, attorneys' fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) (Entered: 09/01/2010)
2010-09-01
1
REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order) (lom) (Entered: 09/01/2010)
2010-09-01
1
REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Order) (lom) (Entered: 09/01/2010)
2010-09-01
2
TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 8-17-10 11:00 a.m. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Bridget Montero, phone number www.bridgetmontero.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter, www.bridgetmontero.com, or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 10/5/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10/15/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/13/2010. (Montero, Bridget) (Entered: 09/14/2010)
2010-09-14
1
NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 8-17-10 11:00 a.m. (Montero, Bridget) (Entered: 09/14/2010)
2010-09-14
1