Cherdak v. Vock
1:11-cv-01311
Overview
Case Number
1:11-cv-01311
Filing Date
2011-12-05
Status
Terminated
Termination Date
2012-08-16
Court
District Court, E.D. Virginia (vaed)
Presiding Judge
Retired Jud Liam O'Grady
Nature of Suit
830 Patent
Jurisdiction Type
Federal Question
Cause of Action
35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demand
None
Parties
Defendant
Phatrat Technology, LLC
Represented By
3 Attorneys ListedOblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt PC
Tel: +1 (703) 412-6485
1940 Duke St, Alexandria, VA 22314
Lathrop & Gage LC
Tel: +1 (202) 469-6936
Fax: +1 (202) 469-6949
Lathrop & Gage LC, 1300 Eye St NW
Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt PC
Tel: +1 (703) 413-3000
Fax: +1 (703) 413-2220
1940 Duke St, Alexandria, VA 22314
Curtis A. Vock
Represented By
3 Attorneys ListedOblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt PC
Tel: +1 (703) 412-6485
1940 Duke St, Alexandria, VA 22314
Lathrop & Gage LC
Tel: +1 (202) 469-6936
Fax: +1 (202) 469-6949
Lathrop & Gage LC, 1300 Eye St NW
Oblon Spivak McClelland Maier & Neustadt PC
Tel: +1 (703) 413-3000
Fax: +1 (703) 413-2220
1940 Duke St, Alexandria, VA 22314
Plaintiff
Court & Judges
Court
District Court, E.D. Virginia (vaed)
Presiding Judge
Retired Jud Liam O'Grady
Patents Involved
No asserted patent numbers detected in initial docket filings yet.
Docket Entries
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
1
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 14683025737.), filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Letter, # 23 Receipt)(rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
2
Summons Issued as to Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. For service by process server. (rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-05
1
Report on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark(s) 5,452,269 and 5,343,445. (rban, ) (Entered: 12/06/2011)
2011-12-06
1
CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer/Response re 1 Complaint,, by Apple, Inc. (Agreed Order sent up to JFA chambers on 1/6/12) (tfitz, ) (Entered: 01/06/2012)
2012-01-06
1
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,, by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 01/06/2012)
2012-01-06
1
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,, by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 01/06/2012)
2012-01-06
1
ORDER granting re 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,, Apple, Inc. answer due 2/3/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 1/6/12. (tfitz, ) (Entered: 01/06/2012)
2012-01-06
1
ORDER granting 6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Nike, Inc. answer due 2/3/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 1/9/12. (tfitz, ) (Entered: 01/09/2012)
2012-01-09
1
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
1
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
2
Memorandum in Support re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
1
MOTION Judicial Notice re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
1
MOTION Judicial Notice re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
2
MOTION Judicial Notice re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
2
MOTION Judicial Notice re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
2
MOTION Judicial Notice re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
2
MOTION Judicial Notice re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
2
Notice of Hearing Date set for 02/24/2012 re 11 MOTION Judicial Notice re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/13/2012)
2012-01-13
1
Set Deadlines as to 11 MOTION Judicial Notice re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Motion Hearing set for 2/24/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (clar, )
2012-01-17
1
No Actions
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by John J. Shaeffer and Certification of Local Counsel Lisa M. Bass Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2871807. by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/19/2012)
2012-01-19
1
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 01/23/2012)
2012-01-23
1
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 01/23/2012)
2012-01-23
2
Memorandum in Support re 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 01/23/2012)
2012-01-23
1
Memorandum in Support re 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 01/23/2012)
2012-01-23
2
Memorandum in Support re 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 01/23/2012)
2012-01-23
2
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John J. Shaeffer. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 1/23/2012. (stas) (Entered: 01/25/2012)
2012-01-23
1
Notice of Hearing Date January 27, 2012 re 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss (Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 01/24/2012)
2012-01-24
1
Waiver of re 16 Notice of Hearing Date, 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss by Erik B. Cherdak (Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 01/24/2012)
2012-01-24
1
RESPONSE to Motion re 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/24/2012)
2012-01-24
1
RESPONSE to Motion re 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 01/24/2012)
2012-01-24
2
Notice of Correction re: 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Vock and Phatrat's Motion to Dismiss by Erik B. Cherdak. The filing user has been notified to file a Notice of Hearing Date or a Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument. (stas)
2012-01-24
1
No Actions
ORDER that pltf's 14 Motion for Extension of Time is granted in part and denied in part. Pltf shall file his opposition to defts' Motion to Dismiss (Docket no. 9) by Friday, February 10, 2012 and defts shall file their reply by Friday, February 17, 2012. If pltf files an amended complaint in a timely manner, defts' Motion to Dismiss will be deemed moot and the defts shall file a responsive pleading to the amended complaint within 14 days. Pltf's counsel is reminded that under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), if an amended complaint is not filed within 21 days of service of the Motion to Dismiss, leave of Court will be required. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 1/25/2012. (stas) (Entered: 01/25/2012)
2012-01-25
1
NOTICE of Appearance by Tara Lynn Renee Zurawski on behalf of Apple, Inc. (Zurawski, Tara) (Entered: 01/27/2012)
2012-01-27
1
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by William Charles Rooklidge and Certification of Local Counsel Tara Lynn R. Zurawski Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2882996. by Apple, Inc.. (Zurawski, Tara) Modified on 1/27/2012 to correct certifying local counsel (stas). (Entered: 01/27/2012)
2012-01-27
1
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michael J. Stimson and Certification of Local Counsel Tara Lynn R. Zurawski Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2883005. by Apple, Inc.. (Zurawski, Tara) Modified on 1/27/2012 to correct certifying local counsel (stas). (Entered: 01/27/2012)
2012-01-27
1
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michelle Stover and Certification of Local Counsel Tara Lynn R. Zurawski Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2883013. by Apple, Inc.. (Zurawski, Tara) Modified on 1/27/2012 to correct certifying local counsel(stas). (Entered: 01/27/2012)
2012-01-27
1
NOTICE of Appearance by Walter Dekalb Kelley, Jr on behalf of Apple, Inc. (Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 01/27/2012)
2012-01-27
1
Notice of Correction re: 22 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by William Charles Rooklidge and Certification of Local Counsel Walter D. Kelley, Jr./Tara Lynn R. Zurawski Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2882996; 23 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michael J. Stimson and Certification of Local Counsel Walter D. Kelley, Jr./Tara Lynn R. Zurawski Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2883005., and 24 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michelle Stover and Certification of Local Counsel Walter D. Kelley, Jr./Tara Lynn R. Zurawski Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2883013. The docket has been corrected to list the correct certifying local counsel. (stas)
2012-01-27
1
No Actions
ORDER granting 22 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by William Charles Rooklidge. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 1/30/2012. (stas) (Entered: 01/31/2012)
2012-01-30
1
ORDER granting 23 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michael J. Stimson. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 1/30/2012. (stas) (Entered: 01/31/2012)
2012-01-30
1
ORDER granting 24 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michelle Stover. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 1/30/2012. (stas) (Entered: 01/31/2012)
2012-01-30
1
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc. (Zurawski, Tara) Modified on 2/3/2012 to correct party filers (stas). (Entered: 02/02/2012)
2012-02-02
1
ORDER that the 29 Consent Motion for an Extension of Time filed by Apple, Inc. and Nike, Inc. is GRANTED, and Apple, Inc. and Nike, Inc. shall have through and including March 2, 2012, to answer or otherwise respond to Pltf's Complaint in this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 2/2/2012. (stas) (Entered: 02/02/2012)
2012-02-02
1
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
1
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc., Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock, filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 02/03/2012)
2012-02-03
2
Notice of Correction re: 29 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Nike, Inc. and Apple, Inc. by Apple, Inc. The text has been modified to reflect the correct parties/filers of the document. (stas)
2012-02-03
1
No Actions
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David V. Clark and Certification of Local Counsel Lisa M. Bass Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2901432. by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/09/2012)
2012-02-09
1
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Travis W. McCallon and Certification of Local Counsel Lisa M. Bass Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2901439. by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/09/2012)
2012-02-09
1
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by William A. Rudy and Certification of Local Counsel Lisa M. Bass Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2901451. by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/09/2012)
2012-02-09
1
ORDER Before the Court is Defts' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 9). Pltf has filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defts' 9 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 2/15/2012. (stas) (Entered: 02/15/2012)
2012-02-15
1
ORDER granting 32 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David V. Clark. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 2/15/2012. (stas) (Entered: 02/16/2012)
2012-02-15
1
ORDER granting 33 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Travis W. McCallon. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 2/15/2012. (stas) (Entered: 02/16/2012)
2012-02-15
1
ORDER granting 34 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by William A. Rudy. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 2/15/2012. (stas) (Entered: 02/16/2012)
2012-02-15
1
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
1
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
2
Memorandum in Support re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
1
MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
1
MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
2
MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
2
MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
2
MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
2
MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
2
Notice of Hearing Date set for 03/16/2012 re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 02/17/2012)
2012-02-17
1
Set Deadlines as to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Motion Hearing set for 3/16/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (clar, )
2012-02-21
1
No Actions
Per LOG chambers motions set for 2/24/12 are moot (clar, )
2012-02-23
1
No Actions
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michael J. Harris and Certification of Local Counsel Bradley C. Wright Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2924013. by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 02/24/2012)
2012-02-24
1
Amended Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michael J. Harris and Certification of Local Counsel Bradley C. Wright by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 02/24/2012)
2012-02-24
1
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Erik S. Maurer and Certification of Local Counsel Bradley C. Wright Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2924089. by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 02/24/2012)
2012-02-24
1
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Christopher J. Renk and Certification of Local Counsel Bradley C. Wright Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2924106. by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 02/24/2012)
2012-02-24
1
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Victoria R. M. Webb and Certification of Local Counsel Bradley C. Wright Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2924182. by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 02/24/2012)
2012-02-24
1
Amended Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Christopher J. Renk and Certification of Local Counsel Bradley C. Wright by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 02/27/2012)
2012-02-27
1
ORDER granting 48 Amended Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Christopher J. Renk. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 2/29/2012. (stas) (Entered: 03/01/2012)
2012-02-29
1
ORDER granting 47 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Victoria R. M. Webb. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 2/29/2012. (stas) (Entered: 03/01/2012)
2012-02-29
1
ORDER granting 45 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Erik S. Maurer. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 2/29/2012. (stas) (Entered: 03/01/2012)
2012-02-29
1
ORDER granting 44 Amended Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Michael J. Harris. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 2/29/2012. (stas) (Entered: 03/01/2012)
2012-02-29
1
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
1
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Opposition to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2A, # 3 Exhibit 2B, # 4 Exhibit 2C, # 5 Exhibit 2D, # 6 Exhibit 3, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5, # 9 Exhibit 6 Part 1 of 2, # 10 Exhibit 6 Part 2 of 2, # 11 Exhibit 7 Part 1 of 2, # 12 Exhibit 7 Part 2 of 2)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/5/2012 to remove duplicative language and to link the opposition to the correct motion (stas). (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
1
MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Memorandum in Support re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
1
Notice of Hearing Date set for 03/23/2012 re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
1
Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
1
Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Apple, Inc.. (Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
1
MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint by Apple, Inc.. (Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
1
Memorandum in Support re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
1
Memorandum in Support re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
2
Notice of Hearing Date set for Friday, March 23, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 03/02/2012)
2012-03-02
1
Notice of Correction re 53 Opposition to 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Erik B. Cherdak. The docket has been corrected to link the opposition to the correct motion. (stas)
2012-03-05
1
No Actions
Set Deadlines as to 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 3/23/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (clar, )
2012-03-05
1
No Actions
Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jerry D. Voight and Certification of Local Counsel Lisa M. Bass Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-2939377. by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 03/06/2012)
2012-03-06
1
MOTION to Disqualify Counsel by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
2012-03-07
1
MOTION to Disqualify Counsel by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
2012-03-07
2
Memorandum in Support re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
2012-03-07
1
Memorandum in Support re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
2012-03-07
2
Memorandum in Support re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
2012-03-07
2
Memorandum in Support re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
2012-03-07
2
Notice of Hearing Date March 30, 2012 re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel (Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
2012-03-07
1
ORDERED that Defendants' reply brief is due no later than 5 calendar days following the Court's ruling on the Motion to Disqualify. All other briefing in the above captioned matter will remain scheduled pursuant to Local Rules. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 3/8/2012. (rban, ) (Entered: 03/08/2012)
2012-03-08
1
ORDER granting 62 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jerry Voight. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 3/8/2012. (stas) (Entered: 03/09/2012)
2012-03-08
1
Set Deadlines as to 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel. Motion Hearing set for 3/30/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (clar, )
2012-03-08
1
No Actions
Notice of Hearing Date set for 04/13/2012 re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 03/09/2012)
2012-03-09
1
Reset Deadlines as to 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Motion Hearing set for 4/13/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (clar, )
2012-03-12
1
No Actions
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/13/2012)
2012-03-13
1
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/13/2012)
2012-03-13
2
ORDER granting 69 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Extend is GRANTED and that: - Cherdak's time in which to file an Opposition to Nike and Apple's MOtions to Dimiss (ECF 54 & 59) is extended to and including March 26, 2012; and - Nike and Apple time in which to file their Reply Briefs to Cherdak's Opposition is exteded to and including April 6, 2012.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 3/13/2012. (tche) (Entered: 03/14/2012)
2012-03-13
1
Memorandum in Opposition re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP as Counsel for Defendants filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
2012-03-15
1
Memorandum in Opposition re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP as Counsel for Defendants filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
2012-03-15
2
Declaration re 71 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Disqualify (Declaration of Anthony M. Gutowski) by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
2012-03-15
1
Declaration re 71 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Disqualify (Declaration of Anthony M. Gutowski) by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
2012-03-15
2
Declaration re 71 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Disqualify (Declaration of Jerry D. Voight) by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Bass, Lisa) (Entered: 03/15/2012)
2012-03-15
1
REPLY to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Erik Cherdak, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/21/2012)
2012-03-21
1
REPLY to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Erik Cherdak, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/21/2012)
2012-03-21
2
REPLY to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Erik Cherdak, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/21/2012)
2012-03-21
2
REPLY to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Erik Cherdak, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/21/2012)
2012-03-21
2
REPLY to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Erik Cherdak, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/21/2012)
2012-03-21
2
REPLY to Response to Motion re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Erik Cherdak, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 03/21/2012)
2012-03-21
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
1
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 1(A), # 3 Exhibit 1(B), # 4 Exhibit 1(C), # 5 Exhibit 1(D), # 6 Exhibit 1(E), # 7 Exhibit 1(F), # 8 Exhibit 1(G), # 9 Exhibit 2, # 10 Exhibit 3)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
1
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct docket text (stas). (Entered: 03/26/2012)
2012-03-26
2
Notice of Correction re: 75 Memorandum in Opposition re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak, and 76 Memorandum in Opposition re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Erik B. Cherdak. The filing user selected the wrong event. Memorandum in Opposition was selected, and Opposition should have been selected. The docket has been corrected. (stas)
2012-03-27
1
No Actions
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Liam O'Grady: Motion Hearing held on 3/30/2012 re 63 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Erik B. Cherdak. Appearances of counsel. Motion argued and denied. Order to follow. (Court Reporter N. Linnell.) (dper) (Entered: 03/30/2012)
2012-03-30
1
ORDER, for the reasons stated in open court, in addition to the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's 63 Motion to Disqualify Counsel is DENIED. (See Order for details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 3/30/12. (dper) (Entered: 03/30/2012)
2012-03-30
1
NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsay Jane Kile on behalf of Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/03/2012)
2012-04-03
1
MOTION to Permit the Use of Electronic Equipment at the April 13, 2012 Hearing by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
1
MOTION to Permit the Use of Electronic Equipment at the April 13, 2012 Hearing by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
2
Memorandum in Support re 80 MOTION to Permit the Use of Electronic Equipment at the April 13, 2012 Hearing filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
1
NOTICE by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock re 80 MOTION to Permit the Use of Electronic Equipment at the April 13, 2012 Hearing, 81 Memorandum in Support and Stipulation to Ruling on the Papers in Lieu of Hearing (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
1
Opposition to 80 MOTION to Permit the Use of Electronic Equipment at the April 13, 2012 Hearing filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
1
Opposition to 80 MOTION to Permit the Use of Electronic Equipment at the April 13, 2012 Hearing filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
2
NOTICE of Appearance by Charles L. Gholz on behalf of Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock (Gholz, Charles) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
1
Reply to Motion re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
1
Declaration re 85 Reply to Motion by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C1-C5, # 4 Exhibit D)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
1
Declaration re 85 Reply to Motion by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C1-C5, # 4 Exhibit D)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
2
Declaration re 85 Reply to Motion by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C1-C5, # 4 Exhibit D)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
2
Declaration re 85 Reply to Motion by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C1-C5, # 4 Exhibit D)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
2
Declaration re 85 Reply to Motion by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C1-C5, # 4 Exhibit D)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
2
Supplemental MOTION Judicial Notice re 85 Reply to Motion by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
1
Supplemental MOTION Judicial Notice re 85 Reply to Motion by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
2
Supplemental MOTION Judicial Notice re 85 Reply to Motion by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/04/2012)
2012-04-04
2
TRANSCRIPT of motions hearing for the date of 3-30-2012 before Judge Liam O'Grady. Court reporter Norman Linnell, telephone number 703-549-4626. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 5/7/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/5/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/5/2012.(linnell, norman) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
1
Supplemental MOTION Judicial Notice re 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
1
Supplemental MOTION Judicial Notice re 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
2
Supplemental MOTION Judicial Notice re 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
2
Supplemental MOTION Judicial Notice re 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
2
Notice of Hearing Date set for 04/13/2012 (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
1
Consent MOTION to Withdraw Lisa M. Bass as Counsel by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
1
Consent MOTION to Withdraw Lisa M. Bass as Counsel by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
2
Memorandum in Support re 91 Consent MOTION to Withdraw Lisa M. Bass as Counsel filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
1
NOTICE by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock re 91 Consent MOTION to Withdraw Lisa M. Bass as Counsel and Waiver of Hearing (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
2012-04-05
1
Notice of Correction re 87 Supplemental MOTION Judicial Notice re 85 Reply to Motion by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. The filing user has been notified to file a Notice of Hearing Date or a Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument. (stas)
2012-04-05
1
No Actions
Objection to 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/06/2012)
2012-04-06
1
Objection to 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/06/2012)
2012-04-06
2
MOTION to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/06/2012)
2012-04-06
1
MOTION to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/06/2012)
2012-04-06
2
Memorandum in Support re 95 MOTION to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/06/2012)
2012-04-06
1
Memorandum in Support re 95 MOTION to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/06/2012)
2012-04-06
2
Notice of Hearing Date April 13, 2012 re 95 MOTION to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight (Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/06/2012)
2012-04-06
1
REPLY to Response to Motion re 54 MOTION to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 04/06/2012)
2012-04-06
1
Reply to Motion re 59 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Apple, Inc.. (Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 04/06/2012)
2012-04-06
1
Set Deadlines as to Supplemental MOTION Judicial Notice re 41 MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction MOTION Judicial Notice re 39 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Motion Hearing set for 4/13/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (clar, )
2012-04-06
1
No Actions
Set Deadlines as to 95 MOTION to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight. Motion Hearing set for 4/13/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (clar, )
2012-04-09
1
No Actions
MOTION Request for Judicial Notice re 76 Memorandum in Opposition, Unopposed by Apple, Inc. by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/10/2012)
2012-04-10
1
MOTION Request for Judicial Notice re 76 Memorandum in Opposition, Unopposed by Apple, Inc. by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/10/2012)
2012-04-10
2
MOTION Request for Judicial Notice re 76 Memorandum in Opposition, Unopposed by Apple, Inc. by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 04/10/2012)
2012-04-10
2
MOTION to Withdraw Jerry Voight as Counsel by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/10/2012)
2012-04-10
1
MOTION to Withdraw Jerry Voight as Counsel by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/10/2012)
2012-04-10
2
Memorandum in Support re 101 MOTION to Withdraw Jerry Voight as Counsel filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/10/2012)
2012-04-10
1
Notice of Hearing Date set for 04/20/2012 re 101 MOTION to Withdraw Jerry Voight as Counsel (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/10/2012)
2012-04-10
1
Objection to 53 Opposition,, Declaration of Jaime Cardenas-Navia [53-7] filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/10/2012)
2012-04-10
1
Opposition to 94 Objection, 95 MOTION to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/11/2012)
2012-04-11
1
Opposition to 94 Objection, 95 MOTION to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/11/2012)
2012-04-11
2
Opposition to 94 Objection, 95 MOTION to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight filed by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/11/2012)
2012-04-11
2
Second Declaration of Jerry D. Voight re 105 Opposition by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Kile, Lindsay) Modified text on 4/12/2012 (klau, ). (Entered: 04/11/2012)
2012-04-11
1
Second Declaration of Jerry D. Voight re 105 Opposition by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Kile, Lindsay) Modified text on 4/12/2012 (klau, ). (Entered: 04/11/2012)
2012-04-11
2
ORDER that Defts' 80 Motion to Access the Court's Audio Visual Facilities is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Defts are permitted to bring computers and/or audio/visual equipment to the April 13, 2012 hearing. Defts shall provide a copy of the audio/visual presentation materials to Pltf by noon on April 12, 2012. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/11/2012. (stas) (Entered: 04/11/2012)
2012-04-11
1
ORDER that Defts Curtis A. Vock's and PhatRat Technology, LLC's 91 Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel is hereby GRANTED. Lisa Bass is hereby withdrawn as Counsel for Defts Curtis A. Vock and PhatRat Technology, LLC and Charles ("Chico") L. Gholz and Lindsay Kile of the law firm of Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Meustadt, L.L.P. are hereby substituted in as counsel of record for said Defts. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/11/2012. (stas) (Entered: 04/13/2012)
2012-04-11
1
Notice of Correction re: 100 MOTION Request for Judicial Notice re 76 Memorandum in Opposition, Unopposed by Apple, Inc. by Erik B. Cherdak. The filing user has been notified to submit a waiver of oral argument as a separate docket entry and not as an attachment to the motion. (stas)
2012-04-11
1
No Actions
Set Deadlines as to 101 MOTION to Withdraw Jerry Voight as Counsel. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (clar, )
2012-04-11
1
No Actions
MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Anderson. 101 MOTION to Withdraw Jerry Voight as Counsel (clar, )
2012-04-11
1
No Actions
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Liam O'Grady: Appearances of counsel. Motions Hearing held on 4/13/2012 re: 1) Defendants 39 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; 2) Defendants 41 Motion for Judicial Notice; 3) Defendant Nike's 54 Motion to Dismiss Counts II, III, and IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; 4) Defendant Apple's 59 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; 5) Defendants 87 Supplemental Motion for Judicial Notice re 85 Reply to Motion; 6) Defendants 89 Supplemental Motion for Judicial Notice re 41 Motion for Judicial Notice and 39 Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint; 7) Plaintiff's 95 Motion to Strike 86 Declaration of Jerry D. Voight; 8) Planfiff's 100 Motion for Judicial Notice re 76 Memorandum in Opposition. All motions argued and taken under advisement. Order to follow. (Court Reporter N. Linnell.) (dper) (Entered: 04/16/2012)
2012-04-13
1
Waiver of re 101 MOTION to Withdraw Jerry Voight as Counsel, 103 Notice of Hearing Date Waiver of Hearing, Notice of Stipulation to Ruling on the Papers by Phatrat Technology, LLC, Curtis A. Vock (Kile, Lindsay) (Entered: 04/17/2012)
2012-04-17
1
ORDER that defts' 101 Motion for Withdrawal of Jerry D. Voight as Counsel is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 4/19/2012. (stas) (Entered: 04/19/2012)
2012-04-19
1
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/23/2012. (rban, ) (Entered: 04/24/2012)
2012-04-23
1
ORDER, for all the reasons given in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion:ORDERED that, each of the motions for judicial notice, 41, 87, 89, and 100 are GRANTED; the objections to Cardenas-Navia declaration 104 and the Voight declaration 94 are OVERRULED, and the Motion to Strike Voight Declaration is DENIED; Defendants Vock and PhatRat's Motion to Dismiss 39 is GRANTED; Defendant Nike's Motion to Dismiss 54 is GRANTED; Defendant Apple's Motion to Dismiss 59 is GRANTED as to Counts II, III, and IV, but DENIED as to Count I; In sum, Counts II through IV are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all Defendants. Defendant Nike and Apple shall file their answers to Count I within 15 days. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/23/2012. (rban, ) (Entered: 04/24/2012)
2012-04-23
1
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 5/30/2012 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. Discovery due by 8/10/2012. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/16/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/25/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Pretrial Notice, # 2 Alexandria Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(stas) (Entered: 04/25/2012)
2012-04-25
1
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 5/30/2012 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. Discovery due by 8/10/2012. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/16/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/25/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Pretrial Notice, # 2 Alexandria Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(stas) (Entered: 04/25/2012)
2012-04-25
2
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 5/30/2012 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. Discovery due by 8/10/2012. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/16/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/25/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Pretrial Notice, # 2 Alexandria Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(stas) (Entered: 04/25/2012)
2012-04-25
2
MOTION for Summary Judgment by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
1
MOTION for Summary Judgment by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
2
Memorandum in Support re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Kelley Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
1
Memorandum in Support re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Kelley Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
2
Memorandum in Support re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Kelley Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
2
Memorandum in Support re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Kelley Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
2
Memorandum in Support re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Kelley Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
2
Memorandum in Support re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Kelley Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
2
Memorandum in Support re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Kelley Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
2
Notice of Hearing Date set for May 25, 2012 re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/04/2012)
2012-05-04
1
Set Deadlines as to 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 5/25/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (clar, )
2012-05-07
1
No Actions
Nike, Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against Erik B. Cherdak by Nike, Inc..(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 05/08/2012)
2012-05-08
1
ANSWER to Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against Erik B. Cherdak by Apple, Inc..(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/08/2012)
2012-05-08
1
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
1
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 2A, # 4 Exhibit 2B, # 5 Exhibit 2C, # 6 Exhibit 2D, # 7 Exhibit 2E, # 8 Exhibit 2F, # 9 Exhibit 2G, # 10 Exhibit 2H, # 11 Exhibit 2I, # 12 Exhibit 3, # 13 Exhibit 4, # 14 Exhibit 5, # 15 Exhibit 6, # 16 Exhibit 7)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/16/2012 to correct docket text(stas). (Entered: 05/15/2012)
2012-05-15
2
Notice of Correction re: 120 Memorandum in Opposition re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Erik B. Cherdak. The filing user selected the wrong event. Memorandum in Opposition was selected, and Opposition should have been selected. The docket has been corrected. (stas)
2012-05-16
1
No Actions
Reply to Motion re 115 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Apple, Inc.. (Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 05/18/2012)
2012-05-18
1
MOTION for Leave to File to File Sur-Reply by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 05/22/2012)
2012-05-22
1
MOTION for Leave to File to File Sur-Reply by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 05/22/2012)
2012-05-22
2
Memorandum in Support re 122 MOTION for Leave to File to File Sur-Reply filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Surreply)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 05/22/2012)
2012-05-22
1
Memorandum in Support re 122 MOTION for Leave to File to File Sur-Reply filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Surreply)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 05/22/2012)
2012-05-22
2
ORDER In the interests of judicial economy, it is the Court's preference to simultaneously consider both claim construction and summary judgment motions by all parties after necessary discovery. Accordingly, the present 115 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice, and the parties are ORDERED to confer and agree to an amenable briefing schedule and hearing date for both claim construction and summary judgment arguments. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 5/22/2012. (stas) (Entered: 05/22/2012)
2012-05-22
1
ORDER Before the Court is Pltf's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply (Dkt. No. 122). The related motion for summary judgment has been denied without prejudice. Thus, Pltf's 122 Motion for Leave to File is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 5/23/2012. (stas) (Entered: 05/23/2012)
2012-05-23
1
Discovery Plan by Erik B. Cherdak, Nike, Inc., Apple, Inc.(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 5/24/2012 to correct party filers (stas). (Entered: 05/23/2012)
2012-05-23
1
Notice of Correction re: 122 MOTION for Leave to File to File Sur-Reply by Erik B. Cherdak. The filing user has been notified to file a Notice of Hearing Date or a Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument. (stas)
2012-05-23
1
No Actions
Notice of Correction re: 126 Discovery Plan by Erik B. Cherdak. The text has been modified to reflect the correct parties/filers of the document. (stas)
2012-05-24
1
No Actions
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson:Initial Pretrial Conference held on 5/30/2012. Appearances; of counsel. Discovery Plan is approved in part. ORDER TO ISSUE. (nbla, ) (Entered: 05/31/2012)
2012-05-30
1
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that - Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in their Proposed Discovery Plan (Docket no. 126) ("Joint Discovery Plan") and at the initial pretrial conference held on May 30, 2012 and taking note of the Scheduling Order entered in this case (Docket no. 114), the court makes the following rulings: 1. All discovery shall be concluded by August 10, 2012. The Joint discovery Plan filed by the parties is approved in part and shall control dioscovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the court. SEE ORDER FOR MORE SPECIFIC DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 05/30/2012. (nbla, ) (Entered: 05/31/2012)
2012-05-30
1
ANSWER to Counterclaim re 119 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Erik B. Cherdak. (Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
1
ANSWER to Counterclaim re 118 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Erik B. Cherdak. (Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
1
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
1
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
2
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
2
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
2
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
2
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
2
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
2
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
2
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
2
Memorandum in Support re 131 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
1
Notice of Hearing Date set for 6/15/2012 re 131 Joint MOTION for Protective Order (Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
2012-06-01
1
TRANSCRIPT of motions hearing for date of 4-13-2012 before Judge Liam O'Grady. Court reporter Norman Linnell, telephone number 703-549-4626. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 7/5/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/6/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/4/2012.(linnell, norman) (Entered: 06/04/2012)
2012-06-04
1
Set Deadlines as to 131 Joint MOTION for Protective Order. Motion Hearing set for 6/15/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (clar, )
2012-06-04
1
No Actions
MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Anderson. 131 Joint MOTION for Protective Order (clar, )
2012-06-04
1
No Actions
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/11/2012)
2012-06-11
1
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/11/2012)
2012-06-11
2
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER Re: The Disclosure, Use and Handling of Confidential Discovery Materials. (See order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 6/12/2012. (stas) (Entered: 06/12/2012)
2012-06-12
1
Notice of Correction re: 135 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Erik B. Cherdak. The filing user has been reminded for future filings that, pursuant to local court rules, signatures on documents submitted to the Court should be local counsel. (stas)
2012-06-12
1
No Actions
MOTION to Stay by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/14/2012)
2012-06-14
1
MOTION to Stay by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/14/2012)
2012-06-14
2
Memorandum in Support re 137 MOTION to Stay filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Erik Cherdak)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/14/2012)
2012-06-14
1
Memorandum in Support re 137 MOTION to Stay filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Erik Cherdak)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/14/2012)
2012-06-14
2
Notice of Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion to Stay set for June 22, 2012 re 137 MOTION to Stay (Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/14/2012)
2012-06-14
1
Set Deadline as to 137 MOTION to Stay by Erik B. Cherdak. Motion Hearing set for 6/22/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (stas)
2012-06-14
1
No Actions
MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
1
MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
2
Memorandum in Support re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
1
Memorandum in Support re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
2
Memorandum in Support re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
2
Memorandum in Support re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
2
Memorandum in Support re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
2
Memorandum in Support re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
2
Memorandum in Support re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
2
Notice of Hearing Date set for June 22, 2012 re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/15/2012)
2012-06-15
1
Set Deadline as to 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc. Motion Hearing set for 6/22/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (stas)
2012-06-15
1
No Actions
Opposition to 137 MOTION to Stay filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/20/2012)
2012-06-20
1
Opposition to 137 MOTION to Stay filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kelley, Walter) (Entered: 06/20/2012)
2012-06-20
2
Memorandum in Opposition re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/20/2012)
2012-06-20
1
Memorandum in Opposition re 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/20/2012)
2012-06-20
2
Memorandum in Support re 137 MOTION to Stay filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
2012-06-21
1
Memorandum in Support re 137 MOTION to Stay filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
2012-06-21
2
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Liam O'Grady: Appearances of counsel. Motion Hearing held on 6/22/2012 re Plaintiff's 137 MOTION to Stay - argued and denied. Defendant's 140 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions - argued and denied. Pltf shall provide information on all infringement contentions as dir by the Scheduling Order. Order to follow. (Court Reporter A. Thomson.)(dper) (Entered: 06/22/2012)
2012-06-22
1
ORDER, for the reasons stated in open Court, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's 137 Motion to Stay is DENIED. The Court is not convinced that the proceedings currently before the United States Patent and Trademark Office counsel a delay in the present litigation. Defendant's 140 Motion to Strike is also DENIED; however, Plaintiff is ORDERED to provide information regarding all infringement contentions as directed by the Scheduling Order. Plaintiff will be barred from litigating infringement as to any product or claim he fails to properly identify by Monday, June 25, 2012, without further Order from the Court. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 6/22/12. (dper) (Entered: 06/22/2012)
2012-06-22
1
Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
1
Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
1
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Memorandum in Support of to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
2
Notice of Hearing Date set for 06/29/12 re 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order (Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
2012-06-27
1
Opposition to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 06/28/2012)
2012-06-28
1
Notice of Hearing Date set for 07/06/2012 re 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order (Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 06/28/2012)
2012-06-28
1
TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for date of 6/22/2012, before Judge O'Grady, Court Reporter Anneliese Thomson, Telephone number 703-299-8595. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS:The parties have thirty(30) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.vaed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the court reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER Redaction Request due 7/30/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/28/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/26/2012.(thomson, anneliese) (Entered: 06/28/2012)
2012-06-28
1
Notice of Correction re 150 Notice of Hearing Date. - The filing user has been notified to file an Amended Notice of Hearing Date, as the Notice of Hearing Date set an untimely hearing.(tche)
2012-06-28
1
No Actions
MOTION REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: John F. Anderson. 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order (stas)
2012-06-29
1
No Actions
Set Deadline as to 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order. Motion Hearing set for 7/6/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (stas)
2012-06-29
1
No Actions
STIPULATION re 152 Notice of Hearing Date, 149 Memorandum, 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 07/03/2012)
2012-07-03
1
STIPULATION re 152 Notice of Hearing Date, 149 Memorandum, 148 Emergency MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order by Erik B. Cherdak. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) (Entered: 07/03/2012)
2012-07-03
2
ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Stipulation filed by Pltf and Deft Apple, Inc., it is hereby ORDERED 1. Cherdak may serve a supplemental economic report regarding damages against Apple on July 6, 2012; 2. Apple will in turn have a one-week extension, until July 30, 2012, to serve its rebuttal economic report; 3. If apple serves its rebuttal economic report after July 23, 2012, Cherdak may take the expert deposition of Apple's economic expert within one week past the August 10, 2012 close of discovery; and 4. Cherdak's Emergency Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (ECF 148) and Amended Notice of Hearing (ECF151 are withdrawn and the Hearing scheduled for Friday, July 6, 2012 is cancelled. SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 7/5/2012. (stas) (Entered: 07/05/2012)
2012-07-05
1
MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Court's Order of June 22, 2012 by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/06/2012)
2012-07-06
1
MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Court's Order of June 22, 2012 by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/06/2012)
2012-07-06
2
Memorandum in Support re 156 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Court's Order of June 22, 2012 filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/06/2012)
2012-07-06
1
Memorandum in Support re 156 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Court's Order of June 22, 2012 filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/06/2012)
2012-07-06
2
Memorandum in Support re 156 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Court's Order of June 22, 2012 filed by Apple, Inc., Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/06/2012)
2012-07-06
2
Notice of Hearing Date set for July 13, 2012 re 156 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Court's Order of June 22, 2012 (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/06/2012)
2012-07-06
1
Set Deadline as to 156 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Court's Order of June 22, 2012. - Motion Hearing set for 7/13/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (tche)
2012-07-06
1
No Actions
Notice of Hearing Date (Amended) set for July 20, 2012 re 156 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Court's Order of June 22, 2012 (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/09/2012)
2012-07-09
1
Per Amended Notice of Hearing Reset Deadlines as to 156 MOTION to Strike and Exclude the Portions of Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions that do not Comply with the Court's Scheduling Order and the Court's Order of June 22, 2012. Motion Hearing reset for 7/20/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (stas)
2012-07-09
1
No Actions
Consent MOTION to Seal Exhibits A through C to Nike's Memorandum in Support of Defendant Nike, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
1
Consent MOTION to Seal Exhibits A through C to Nike's Memorandum in Support of Defendant Nike, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
2
Memorandum in Support re 160 Consent MOTION to Seal Exhibits A through C to Nike's Memorandum in Support of Defendant Nike, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike filed by Nike, Inc.. (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
1
MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
1
MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
2
Brief in Support to 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike, Memorandum in Support re 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike filed by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
1
Brief in Support to 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike, Memorandum in Support re 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike filed by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
2
Brief in Support to 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike, Memorandum in Support re 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike filed by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
2
Brief in Support to 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike, Memorandum in Support re 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike filed by Nike, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
2
Notice of Hearing Date July 20, 2012 re 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
1
NOTICE by Nike, Inc. re 163 Brief in Support, Memorandum in Support,, of FIling Under Seal Exhibits A through C to Nike's Memorandum (Wright, Bradley) (Entered: 07/13/2012)
2012-07-13
1
Under Seal Exhibits in re 163 Brief in Support, Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C)(clar, ) (Entered: 07/16/2012)
2012-07-16
1
Set Deadlines as to 162 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Supplemental" Expert Report on Damages as to Nike. Motion Hearing set for 7/20/2012 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 700 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (clar, )
2012-07-16
1
No Actions
Consent MOTION to Stay by Erik B. Cherdak, Nike, Inc., Apple, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 7/18/2012 to correct party filers (stas). (Entered: 07/18/2012)
2012-07-18
1
Consent MOTION to Stay by Erik B. Cherdak, Nike, Inc., Apple, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 7/18/2012 to correct party filers (stas). (Entered: 07/18/2012)
2012-07-18
2
ORDER that the 167 CONSENT Motion to Stay the Proceedings to Allow the Parties to Finalize and Execute Settlement Agreements is GRANTED, and all litigation related deadlines, hearings and activities in this matter are hereby stayed for seven days through July 25, 2012, in order to allow the parties to focus on finalizing and executing the settlement agreements, and filing the stipulated dismissals. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 7/18/2012. (stas) (Entered: 07/18/2012)
2012-07-18
1
Notice of Correction re: 167 Consent MOTION to Stay by Erik B. Cherdak. The text has been modified to reflect the correct parties/filers of the document.(stas)
2012-07-18
1
No Actions
Consent MOTION to Stay by Erik B. Cherdak, Nike, Inc., Apple, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 7/26/2012 to correct party filers (stas). (Entered: 07/26/2012)
2012-07-26
1
Consent MOTION to Stay by Erik B. Cherdak, Nike, Inc., Apple, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Ward, Daniel) Modified on 7/26/2012 to correct party filers (stas). (Entered: 07/26/2012)
2012-07-26
2
ORDER that the 169 Second Consent Motion to Stay the Proceedings is GRANTED, and all litigation related deadlines, hearing and activities in this matter are hereby stayed for thirty-five days to allow the parties to effect all terms of the executed settlement agreements. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 7/26/2012. (stas) (Entered: 07/27/2012)
2012-07-26
1
Notice of Correction re: 169 Consent MOTION to Stay by Erik B. Cherdak. The text has been modified to reflect the correct parties/filers of the document.(stas)
2012-07-26
1
No Actions
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims for relief asserted against APPLE INC, by ERIK B. CHERDAK herein are dismissed, with prejudice, and all counterclaims for relief against ERIK B. CHERDAK by APPLE INC. are dismissed without prejudice. (See Order For Details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 8/16/12. (nhall) (Entered: 08/16/2012)
2012-08-16
1
STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims for relief asserted against NIKE INC. by ERIK B. CHERDAK herein are dismissed, with prejudice, and all counterclaims for relief against ERIK B. CHERDAK by NIKE INC. are dismissed without prejudice. (See Order For Details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 8/16/12. (nhall) (Entered: 08/16/2012)
2012-08-16
1