DataMotion Texas, LLC v. Automatic Data Processing, LLC

COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5219516.), filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - '248 Patent)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 05/28/2015)

2015-05-28

1

View

COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5219516.), filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - '248 Patent)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 05/28/2015)

2015-05-28

2

View

COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5219516.), filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - '248 Patent)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 05/28/2015)

2015-05-28

2

View

In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )

2015-05-28

1

No Actions

Case assigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )

2015-05-28

1

No Actions

SUMMONS Issued as to Automatic Data Processing, Inc., (Attachments: # 1 Automatic Data Processing LLC)(ch, ) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

2015-06-01

1

View

SUMMONS Issued as to Automatic Data Processing, Inc., (Attachments: # 1 Automatic Data Processing LLC)(ch, ) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

2015-06-01

2

View

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephen F Schlather on behalf of DataMotion Texas, LLC (Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

2015-06-01

1

View

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shea Neal Palavan on behalf of DataMotion Texas, LLC (Palavan, Shea) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

2015-06-01

1

View

Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

2015-06-01

1

View

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC identifying Corporate Parent DataMotion, Inc. for DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 06/02/2015)

2015-06-02

1

View

SUMMONS Returned Executed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. served on 6/10/2015, answer due 7/1/2015. (ch, ) (Entered: 06/26/2015)

2015-06-25

1

View

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Automatic Data Processing, Inc..( Jones, Michael) (Entered: 06/30/2015)

2015-06-30

1

View

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Automatic Data Processing, LLC.( Jones, Michael) (Entered: 06/30/2015)

2015-06-30

1

View

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. to 7/31/2015; Automatic Data Processing, LLC to 7/31/2015. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( sm, )

2015-06-30

1

No Actions

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by DataMotion Texas, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order - Granting Dismissal for Automatic Data Processing LLC)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/01/2015)

2015-07-01

1

View

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by DataMotion Texas, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order - Granting Dismissal for Automatic Data Processing LLC)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/01/2015)

2015-07-01

2

View

AMENDED COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Automatic Data Processing, Inc., ADP, LLC, filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC.(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/01/2015)

2015-07-01

1

View

ORDER granting 10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Automatic Data Processing, LLC. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/8/2015. (ch, ) (Entered: 07/08/2015)

2015-07-08

1

View

SUMMONS Issued as to ADP, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 07/08/2015)

2015-07-08

1

View

SUMMONS Returned Executed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. ADP, LLC served on 7/8/2015, answer due 7/29/2015. (ch, ) (Entered: 07/15/2015)

2015-07-15

1

View

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re ADP, LLC.( Jones, Michael) (Entered: 07/28/2015)

2015-07-28

1

View

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for ADP, LLC to 7/31/2015. 2 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )

2015-07-28

1

No Actions

ANSWER to 11 Amended Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against DataMotion Texas, LLC by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc..(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 07/31/2015)

2015-07-31

1

View

DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 07/31/2015)

2015-07-31

1

View

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Automatic Data Processing, Inc. for ADP, LLC. (Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 07/31/2015)

2015-07-31

1

View

AMENDED COMPLAINT against ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc., Automatic Data Processing, LLC, filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC.(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 08/10/2015)

2015-08-10

1

View

DataMotion's ANSWER to 16 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendants ADP LLC and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. by DataMotion Texas, LLC.(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 08/24/2015)

2015-08-24

1

View

ANSWER to 19 Amended Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against DataMotion Texas, LLC by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc..(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 08/28/2015)

2015-08-28

1

View

ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION. The above-captioned cases are hereby CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues, except venue. Cause No. 2:15-cv-894 is designated as the LEAD CASE. All parties are instructed to file any future filings (except relating to venue) in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for venue determinations and trial.The Clerk is instructed to add the consolidated defendants into the Lead Case and their corresponding Lead and Local Counsel only. Additional counsel may file a Notice of Appearance in the Lead Case if they wish to continue as counsel of record in the lead consolidated action. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 08/27/15. (mll, ) (Entered: 08/31/2015)

2015-08-31

1

View

This civil action is CONSOLIDATED with cause 2:15cv894 designated as the Lead Case. All future pleadings -- except relating to venue -- are to be filed in the Lead Case. This case remains active for venue determination and trial. (mll, )

2015-08-31

1

No Actions

Plaintiff's ANSWER to 21 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim by DataMotion Texas, LLC.(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 09/14/2015)

2015-09-14

1

View

Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Declaration of Jerry Fitzsimmons)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 11/11/2015)

2015-11-11

1

View

Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Declaration of Jerry Fitzsimmons)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 11/11/2015)

2015-11-11

2

View

Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Declaration of Jerry Fitzsimmons)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 11/11/2015)

2015-11-11

2

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 1 - DataMotion's '248 PIC chart to ADP, # 3 Exhibit 2 - DataMotion's '967 PIC chart to ADP, # 4 Exhibit 3 - DataMotion's Initial and Additional Disclosures to ADP)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

1

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 1 - DataMotion's '248 PIC chart to ADP, # 3 Exhibit 2 - DataMotion's '967 PIC chart to ADP, # 4 Exhibit 3 - DataMotion's Initial and Additional Disclosures to ADP)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 1 - DataMotion's '248 PIC chart to ADP, # 3 Exhibit 2 - DataMotion's '967 PIC chart to ADP, # 4 Exhibit 3 - DataMotion's Initial and Additional Disclosures to ADP)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 1 - DataMotion's '248 PIC chart to ADP, # 3 Exhibit 2 - DataMotion's '967 PIC chart to ADP, # 4 Exhibit 3 - DataMotion's Initial and Additional Disclosures to ADP)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 1 - DataMotion's '248 PIC chart to ADP, # 3 Exhibit 2 - DataMotion's '967 PIC chart to ADP, # 4 Exhibit 3 - DataMotion's Initial and Additional Disclosures to ADP)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

1

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

Additional Attachments to Main Document: 25 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Bob Janacek, # 2 Affidavit of Mahesh Muchhala, # 3 Exhibit 4 - Distance from Fordham to Marshall, # 4 Exhibit 5 - Distance from Fordham to SF, # 5 Exhibit 6 - Distance from NJ to Marshall, # 6 Exhibit 7 - Distance from NJ to SF, # 7 Exhibit 8 - HP Office Locations, # 8 Exhibit 9 - HP Service Locations, # 9 Exhibit 10 - '248 Patent Assignment Search, # 10 Exhibit 11 - '967 Patent Assignment Search, # 11 Exhibit 12 - EDTX and NDCA Caseload Stats, # 12 Exhibit 13 - '248 Patent, # 13 Exhibit 14 - '967 Patent, # 14 Exhibit 15 - CenturyLink 10K, # 15 Exhibit 16 - MariaDB Locations, # 16 Exhibit 17 - DataMotion's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 37 in 15-cv-918), # 17 Exhibit 18 - Marshall Per Diem, # 18 Exhibit 19 - SF Per Diem)(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

2015-11-30

2

View

REPLY to Response to Motion re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 12/11/2015)

2015-12-11

1

View

SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 20 - Plaintiff's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 39 in HP case), # 3 Exhibit 21 - Plaintiff's Sur-Reply to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 45 in HP case), # 4 Exhibit 22 - HP Palo Alto and Sunnyvale Employees, # 5 Exhibit 23 - HP Cupertino Employees)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 12/21/2015)

2015-12-21

1

View

SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 20 - Plaintiff's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 39 in HP case), # 3 Exhibit 21 - Plaintiff's Sur-Reply to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 45 in HP case), # 4 Exhibit 22 - HP Palo Alto and Sunnyvale Employees, # 5 Exhibit 23 - HP Cupertino Employees)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 12/21/2015)

2015-12-21

2

View

SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 20 - Plaintiff's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 39 in HP case), # 3 Exhibit 21 - Plaintiff's Sur-Reply to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 45 in HP case), # 4 Exhibit 22 - HP Palo Alto and Sunnyvale Employees, # 5 Exhibit 23 - HP Cupertino Employees)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 12/21/2015)

2015-12-21

2

View

SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 20 - Plaintiff's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 39 in HP case), # 3 Exhibit 21 - Plaintiff's Sur-Reply to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 45 in HP case), # 4 Exhibit 22 - HP Palo Alto and Sunnyvale Employees, # 5 Exhibit 23 - HP Cupertino Employees)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 12/21/2015)

2015-12-21

2

View

SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 20 - Plaintiff's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 39 in HP case), # 3 Exhibit 21 - Plaintiff's Sur-Reply to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 45 in HP case), # 4 Exhibit 22 - HP Palo Alto and Sunnyvale Employees, # 5 Exhibit 23 - HP Cupertino Employees)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 12/21/2015)

2015-12-21

2

View

SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Stephen F. Schlather, # 2 Exhibit 20 - Plaintiff's Response to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 39 in HP case), # 3 Exhibit 21 - Plaintiff's Sur-Reply to HP's MTV (Dkt. No. 45 in HP case), # 4 Exhibit 22 - HP Palo Alto and Sunnyvale Employees, # 5 Exhibit 23 - HP Cupertino Employees)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 12/21/2015)

2015-12-21

2

View

ORDER granting 24 Opposed Motion to Transfer Venue. ORDERED that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The Clerk is directed to take such steps as are necessary to effect this transfer. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/2/2016. (ch, ) (Entered: 02/03/2016)

2016-02-03

1

View

Case transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 2:15-cv-00889. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (Entered: 03/02/2016)

2016-03-01

1

View

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/2/2016. Case Management Conference set for 6/9/2016 11:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/1/16. (Attachments: # 1 LB Standing Order, # 2 Standing Order)(aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2016) (Entered: 03/02/2016)

2016-03-01

1

View

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/2/2016. Case Management Conference set for 6/9/2016 11:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/1/16. (Attachments: # 1 LB Standing Order, # 2 Standing Order)(aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2016) (Entered: 03/02/2016)

2016-03-01

2

View

Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/2/2016. Case Management Conference set for 6/9/2016 11:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/1/16. (Attachments: # 1 LB Standing Order, # 2 Standing Order)(aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2016) (Entered: 03/02/2016)

2016-03-01

2

View

CLERK'S NOTICE : Informing all Parties that this case is now with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Re 30 Order of Transfer (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2016) (Entered: 03/02/2016)

2016-03-02

1

View

Joint MOTION to Dismiss all Claims between Plaintiff and Defendants filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. Responses due by 3/31/2016. Replies due by 4/7/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order - Order of Dismissal with Prejudice)(Edmonds, John) (Filed on 3/17/2016) (Entered: 03/17/2016)

2016-03-17

1

View

Joint MOTION to Dismiss all Claims between Plaintiff and Defendants filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. Responses due by 3/31/2016. Replies due by 4/7/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order - Order of Dismissal with Prejudice)(Edmonds, John) (Filed on 3/17/2016) (Entered: 03/17/2016)

2016-03-17

2

View

Order re 33 Motion to Dismiss entered by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The plaintiff DataMotion Texas LLC ("DataMotion") and the defendants Automatic Data Processing and ADP, LLC (collectively, "ADP") filed a joint motion to dismiss DataMotion's claims against ADP with prejudice and "ADP's claims, defenses or counterclaims for relief against DataMotion without prejudice, and with all attorneys' fees, cost of court and expenses borne by the party incurring same." (See ECF No. 33.) They attach a proposed order but a dispositive order requires the parties' consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). That said, the court construes the parties' motion as a joint stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that does not require a separate court order. Thus, pursuant to the parties' stipulation, DataMotion's claims against ADP are dismissed with prejudice and ADP's claims, defenses or counterclaims for relief against DataMotion are dismissed without prejudice. Again pursuant to the parties' stipulation, all attorneys' fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by the party incurring the same. If the parties nonetheless want a separate signed order, they may file a short joint consent saying that, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties voluntarily consent to the undersigned's issuing the order at ECF No. 33-1. The court then will sign the order at ECF No. 33-1. (The document attached to this text entry is a separate document that memorializes the parties' stipulated dismissal.) (Entered: 03/18/2016)

2016-03-18

1

View

Overview

Parties

Defendant

ADP, LLC Follow

Represented By

Automatic Data Processing Inc. Follow

Represented By

Automatic Data Processing, LLC Follow

Represented By

Counter Defendant

DataMotion Texas, LLC Follow

Represented By

Court & Judges

Patents Involved

Docket Entries

COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5219516.), filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - '248 Patent)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 05/28/2015)

COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5219516.), filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - '248 Patent)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 05/28/2015)

COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-5219516.), filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A - '248 Patent)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 05/28/2015)

Case assigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )

SUMMONS Issued as to Automatic Data Processing, Inc., (Attachments: # 1 Automatic Data Processing LLC)(ch, ) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

SUMMONS Issued as to Automatic Data Processing, Inc., (Attachments: # 1 Automatic Data Processing LLC)(ch, ) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephen F Schlather on behalf of DataMotion Texas, LLC (Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shea Neal Palavan on behalf of DataMotion Texas, LLC (Palavan, Shea) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC identifying Corporate Parent DataMotion, Inc. for DataMotion Texas, LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 06/02/2015)

SUMMONS Returned Executed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. served on 6/10/2015, answer due 7/1/2015. (ch, ) (Entered: 06/26/2015)

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Automatic Data Processing, Inc..( Jones, Michael) (Entered: 06/30/2015)

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Automatic Data Processing, LLC.( Jones, Michael) (Entered: 06/30/2015)

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. to 7/31/2015; Automatic Data Processing, LLC to 7/31/2015. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( sm, )

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by DataMotion Texas, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order - Granting Dismissal for Automatic Data Processing LLC)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/01/2015)

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by DataMotion Texas, LLC (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order - Granting Dismissal for Automatic Data Processing LLC)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/01/2015)

AMENDED COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Automatic Data Processing, Inc., ADP, LLC, filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC.(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/01/2015)

ORDER granting 10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Automatic Data Processing, LLC. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/8/2015. (ch, ) (Entered: 07/08/2015)

SUMMONS Issued as to ADP, LLC. (ch, ) (Entered: 07/08/2015)

SUMMONS Returned Executed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. ADP, LLC served on 7/8/2015, answer due 7/29/2015. (ch, ) (Entered: 07/15/2015)

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re ADP, LLC.( Jones, Michael) (Entered: 07/28/2015)

Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for ADP, LLC to 7/31/2015. 2 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )

ANSWER to 11 Amended Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against DataMotion Texas, LLC by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc..(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 07/31/2015)

DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 07/31/2015)

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Automatic Data Processing, Inc. for ADP, LLC. (Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 07/31/2015)

AMENDED COMPLAINT against ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc., Automatic Data Processing, LLC, filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC.(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 08/10/2015)

DataMotion's ANSWER to 16 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim of Defendants ADP LLC and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. by DataMotion Texas, LLC.(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 08/24/2015)

ANSWER to 19 Amended Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against DataMotion Texas, LLC by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc..(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 08/28/2015)

This civil action is CONSOLIDATED with cause 2:15cv894 designated as the Lead Case. All future pleadings -- except relating to venue -- are to be filed in the Lead Case. This case remains active for venue determination and trial. (mll, )

Plaintiff's ANSWER to 21 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim by DataMotion Texas, LLC.(Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 09/14/2015)

Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Declaration of Jerry Fitzsimmons)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 11/11/2015)

Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Declaration of Jerry Fitzsimmons)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 11/11/2015)

Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Declaration of Jerry Fitzsimmons)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 11/11/2015)

REPLY to Response to Motion re 24 Opposed MOTION to Transfer Venue filed by ADP, LLC, Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. (Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 12/11/2015)

Case transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 2:15-cv-00889. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (Entered: 03/02/2016)

CLERK'S NOTICE : Informing all Parties that this case is now with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Re 30 Order of Transfer (aaa, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2016) (Entered: 03/02/2016)

Joint MOTION to Dismiss all Claims between Plaintiff and Defendants filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. Responses due by 3/31/2016. Replies due by 4/7/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order - Order of Dismissal with Prejudice)(Edmonds, John) (Filed on 3/17/2016) (Entered: 03/17/2016)

Joint MOTION to Dismiss all Claims between Plaintiff and Defendants filed by DataMotion Texas, LLC. Responses due by 3/31/2016. Replies due by 4/7/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order - Order of Dismissal with Prejudice)(Edmonds, John) (Filed on 3/17/2016) (Entered: 03/17/2016)

Track Case Updates

ADP, LLC

Automatic Data Processing Inc.

Automatic Data Processing, LLC

DataMotion Texas, LLC