Digitech Image Technologies LLC v. Electronics For Imaging Inc
8:12-cv-01324
Overview
Case Number
8:12-cv-01324
Filing Date
2012-08-16
Status
Litigation filed
Court
District Court, C.D. California
Nature of Suit
830 Patent
Parties
Defendant
Plaintiff
Court & Judges
Court
District Court, C.D. California
Presiding Judge
Otis D. Wright II
Patents Involved
No asserted patent numbers detected in initial docket filings yet.
Docket Entries
COMPLAINT against Defendants Electronics For Imaging Inc, Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings USA Inc and Xerox Corporation. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block.(Filing fee $350 Paid). Jury Demanded. Filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC.(lwag) (lwag). (Entered: 08/17/2012)
2012-08-16
1
CERTIFICATION and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (lwag) (lwag). (Entered: 08/17/2012)
2012-08-16
1
NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (lwag) (Entered: 08/17/2012)
2012-08-16
1
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed.(lwag) (Entered: 08/17/2012)
2012-08-16
1
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendants Electronics For Imaging Inc, Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings USA Inc and Xerox Corporation. (lwag)
2012-08-16
1
No Actions
REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 08/21/2012)
2012-08-21
1
INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen) (Entered: 08/27/2012)
2012-08-27
1
ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge James V. Selna. Scheduling Conference set for 12/17/2012 11:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (jlen) (Entered: 08/28/2012)
2012-08-28
1
NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. Digitech Image Technologies, LLC's Notice of Related Cases Per Local Rule 83-1.3 (Schlather, Stephen) (Entered: 08/30/2012)
2012-08-30
1
STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Electronics For Imaging Inc answer now due 10/12/2012, re Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 filed by Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc.(Cote, Frank) (Entered: 09/05/2012)
2012-09-05
1
STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Xerox Corporation answer now due 10/12/2012, filed by Defendant Xerox Corporation.(Delling, Anthony) (Entered: 09/07/2012)
2012-09-07
1
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher P Broderick on behalf of Defendants Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings USA Inc (Broderick, Christopher) (Entered: 09/11/2012)
2012-09-11
1
Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 11/12/2012 re Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 filed by Defendants Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings USA Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Broderick, Christopher) (Entered: 09/11/2012)
2012-09-11
1
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer 12 : Defendants Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc answer due 11/12/2012; Konica Minolta Holdings Inc answer due 11/12/2012; Konica Minolta Holdings USA Inc answer due 11/12/2012. (rla) (Entered: 09/13/2012)
2012-09-11
1
APPLICATION for attorney Joshua Long to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (PHV FEE PAID.) filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (ak) (Entered: 10/29/2012)
2012-09-14
1
APPLICATION for attorney Stephen Schlather to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (PHV FEE PAID.) filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (ak) (Entered: 10/29/2012)
2012-09-14
1
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 09/25/2012)
2012-09-25
1
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings Inc, Konica Minolta Holdings USA Inc. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 10/02/2012)
2012-10-02
1
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Xerox Corporation. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 10/02/2012)
2012-10-02
1
NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 10/02/2012)
2012-10-02
1
ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 with JURY DEMAND filed by defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc.(Cote, Frank) (Entered: 10/03/2012)
2012-10-03
1
Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc, identifying Digitech Image Technologies, LLC, Electronics For Imaging, Inc.. (Cote, Frank) (Entered: 10/03/2012)
2012-10-03
1
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc identifying Electronic For Imaging, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Cote, Frank) (Entered: 10/03/2012)
2012-10-03
1
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Frank P Cote on behalf of Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc (Cote, Frank) (Entered: 10/04/2012)
2012-10-04
1
NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies, LLC's Amended Notice of Related Cases Per Local Rule 83-1.3 (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 10/08/2012)
2012-10-08
1
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: SACV12-01153 ODW (MRWx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block and Judge James V. Selna to Judge Otis D Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge SACV12-01324 ODW (MRWx). Signed by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (dro) (Entered: 10/16/2012)
2012-10-12
1
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is "http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov". It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions on Mondays, Criminal at 10:00 a.m. and Civil at 1:30 p.m. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jre) (Entered: 10/16/2012)
2012-10-15
1
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been reassigned to the Honorable Otis D. Wright II, United States DistrictJudge. The magistrate judges assignment has been changed to the Honorable Michael R.Wilner.Please substitute the initials ODW(MRWx) in place of the initials JVS (RNBx). Thecase number will now read: SA CV 12-01324- ODW(MRWx). Henceforth, it isimperative that the initials ODW(MRWx) be used on all documents to prevent delays in the processing of documents. The Courtroom Deputy Clerk for Judge Wright is Sheila English. She can be reached at (213) 894-8266. Judge Wrights courtroom is located on the Spring Street level of the Spring Street Courthouse, Courtroom 11. Additional information about Judge Wright's procedures can be found on the Courts website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov > Judges Procedures & Schedules. (jre) (Entered: 10/16/2012)
2012-10-16
1
ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: granting 27 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Stephen F. Schlather on behalf of Plaintiff, designating John J. Edmonds as local counsel. (lt) Modified on 10/30/2012 (lt). (Entered: 10/30/2012)
2012-10-25
1
ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: granting 26 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Joshua B. Long on behalf of Plaintiff, designating John J. Edmonds as local counsel. (lt) (Entered: 10/30/2012)
2012-10-25
1
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION for attorney Stephen Schlather to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (PHV FEE PAID.) 27, APPLICATION for attorney Joshua Long to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (PHV FEE PAID.) 26 . The following error(s) was found: A Certification of Good Standing is not attached to Pro Hac Vice Application. Certificates of Good Standing have been required since 9/08. See LR 83-2.3.1. Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): No signatures on Applications. Applicants did not sign the application. See LR 11-1. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lt) (Entered: 10/30/2012)
2012-10-30
1
ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Because this case has been transferred to this Court, Judge Selnas order setting a Rule 26(f) scheduling conference for December 17, 2012, is hereby VACATED 7 . An order setting a new scheduling conference date will issue shortly. (lc) (Entered: 11/07/2012)
2012-11-07
1
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 1/14/2013 01:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc) (Entered: 11/08/2012)
2012-11-07
1
ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: The scheduling conference in this matter, currently for January 14, 2012, is hereby CONTINUED to April 1, 2013. The parties joint Rule 26(f) conference is therefore due no later than March 18, 2013. (lc). Modified on 12/28/2012 (lc). (Entered: 12/28/2012)
2012-12-27
1
Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Comparison w/ NDCal Standard Order)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 12/31/2012)
2012-12-31
1
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 34 by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc) (Entered: 01/03/2013)
2013-01-03
1
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Edison T Lin on behalf of Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc (Lin, Edison) (Entered: 01/14/2013)
2013-01-14
1
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 03/18/2013)
2013-03-18
1
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 03/18/2013)
2013-03-18
2
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 03/18/2013)
2013-03-18
2
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 03/18/2013)
2013-03-18
2
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 03/18/2013)
2013-03-18
2
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 03/18/2013)
2013-03-18
2
PATENT STANDING ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, (lc) (Entered: 03/26/2013)
2013-03-26
1
MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Digitech Cases are, until further order, coordinated for case-management purposes under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42.The parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint brief addressing their respective positions on the protective and electronically-stored information orders to be issued in this case. The joint brief shall not exceed 20 pages in length(excluding exhibits) and shall be filed no later than April 15, 2013. In addition, the stipulated protective order filed in Digitech Image Technologies LLC v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01324, ECF No. 35 (C.D. Cal. filed Jan. 1, 2013), is hereby VACATED. That order will be replaced with a forthcoming protective order applicable in all of these The low-number case, Digitech Image Technologies LLC v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01324-ODW-MRW (C.D. Cal. filed Aug. 16, 2012), will serve as the master case file. All orders, pleadings, motions, and other documents will, when filed and docketed in the master case file, be deemed filed and docketed in each individual related case to the extent applicable. Parties shall enter their appearances in the individual cases, and the Clerk is directed to add all parties and attorneys from the individual cases to the master case file such that all counsel appearing in the individual cases will receive notifications for the master case file as well.consolidated cases.The Cases Against the Retailer Defendants are Hereby Stayed. The Court hereby GRANTS the following retailer Defendants motions to stay: Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. Buy.com, No. 8:12-cv-01668, ECF No. 13 Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. Best Buy Co., No. 8:12-cv-01669, ECF No. 19 Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. B&H Foto & Elec. Corp., No. 8:12-cv-01671, ECF No. 18 Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. Target Corp., No. 8:12-cv-01683, ECF No. 16 Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. Micro Elec. Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01686, ECF No. 16Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. Overstock.com, No. 8:12-cv-01687, ECF No. 16 Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. Newegg Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01688, ECF No. 23 Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. CDW LLC, No. 8:12-cv-01695, ECF No. 22. In addition, the retailer Defendants listed above are hereby ORDERED to communicate with Christopher Broderick as soon as practicable, but in no event later than April 5, 2013, to inform him whether each retailer will agree to be bound to this Courts Markman and invalidity rulings once the stay has been lifted in exchange for a stay of this entire litigation pending final resolution of every manufacturer action. Mr. Broderick shall then email the Courts courtroom deputy clerk, Sheila English Defendants. Defendant Sakars Motion to Transfer Venue in Digitech Image Technologies LLC v. Sakar International Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01673, ECF No. 13 (C.D. Cal. filed December 3, 2012) is hereby DENIED without prejudice. Defendants Sakar and Leica Camera Inc. may renew their motions to transfer after the Court issues a Markman order in this matter. Counter-Defendant Acacia Research Corporations Motion to Dismiss filed in Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. Newegg Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01688, ECF No. 30, is hereby taken under submission. An order will issue. In addition, the April 8, 2013 hearing on Defendant Leaf Imaging Ltd.s Motion to Dismiss filed in Digitech Image Tech. LLC v. Mamiya Digital Imaging Co., No. 8:12-cv-01688, ECF.No. 26, is hereby VACATED and no appearances are necessary. The Motion is taken under submission; an order will issue. Plaintiff is ORDERED to immediately serve a copy of this order on all Defendants who have not yet filed appearances in the cases (and who therefore have not received a copy through the CM/ECF system).Court Reporter: Katie Thibodeaux. (lc) Modified on 4/3/2013 (lc). Modified on 4/5/2013 (lc). (Entered: 04/03/2013)
2013-04-01
1
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (bp) (Entered: 04/03/2013)
2013-04-02
1
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The list of Digitech cases in the minutes of the scheduling conference held on April 1, 2013 39, erroneously listed case numbers correlating to incorrect case names. The corrected list contained in this minute order shall hereby replace the list of Digitech cases on page 6 and page 7 of the April 1, 2013 Scheduling Conference Minute Order 39 . (cch) (Entered: 04/04/2013)
2013-04-04
1
JOINT BRIEF filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. re ESI Order and Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (proposed Stipulated ESI Order), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Plt proposed Protective Order), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Defs proposed Protective Order), # 4 Exhibit 4 (email), # 5 Exhibit 5 (email))(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 04/15/2013)
2013-04-15
1
JOINT BRIEF filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. re ESI Order and Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (proposed Stipulated ESI Order), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Plt proposed Protective Order), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Defs proposed Protective Order), # 4 Exhibit 4 (email), # 5 Exhibit 5 (email))(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 04/15/2013)
2013-04-15
2
JOINT BRIEF filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. re ESI Order and Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (proposed Stipulated ESI Order), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Plt proposed Protective Order), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Defs proposed Protective Order), # 4 Exhibit 4 (email), # 5 Exhibit 5 (email))(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 04/15/2013)
2013-04-15
2
JOINT BRIEF filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. re ESI Order and Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (proposed Stipulated ESI Order), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Plt proposed Protective Order), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Defs proposed Protective Order), # 4 Exhibit 4 (email), # 5 Exhibit 5 (email))(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 04/15/2013)
2013-04-15
2
JOINT BRIEF filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. re ESI Order and Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (proposed Stipulated ESI Order), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Plt proposed Protective Order), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Defs proposed Protective Order), # 4 Exhibit 4 (email), # 5 Exhibit 5 (email))(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 04/15/2013)
2013-04-15
2
JOINT BRIEF filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. re ESI Order and Protective Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (proposed Stipulated ESI Order), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Plt proposed Protective Order), # 3 Exhibit 3 (Defs proposed Protective Order), # 4 Exhibit 4 (email), # 5 Exhibit 5 (email))(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 04/15/2013)
2013-04-15
2
TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 04-01-2013 1:38 p.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: KATIE E. THIBODEAUX, CSR 9858, phone number (213) 894-8676. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 5/20/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/30/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/28/2013. (Duvall, Richard) (Entered: 04/29/2013)
2013-04-29
1
NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 04-01-2013 1:38 p.m. re Transcript 43 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(Duvall, Richard) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/29/2013)
2013-04-29
1
STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Digitechs Local P.R. 3.1 & 3.2 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions and Document Production filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Edmonds, John) Modified on 5/21/2013 (lc). (STRICKEN PER 5/21/13) (Entered: 05/20/2013)
2013-05-20
1
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Court has received Digitech and the LG Defendants stipulation to continue Digitechsdeadline to disclose its asserted claims and infringement contentions and to produce documents. But Digitech filed this stipulation under the lead case, Digitech Image Technologies LLC v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc., No. 8:12-cv-01324-ODW(MRWx). As the Court explained inthe scheduling conference minutes, documents intended to apply only to particular cases are to be filed only with the individual case to which it applies. (Scheduling Conference Minutes, ECF No. 39, at 2.) Because the stipulation currently before the Court applies only to the individual Digitech case against the LG Defendants, the Court hereby STRIKES the parties stipulation 45 . (lc) (Entered: 05/21/2013)
2013-05-21
1
DOCUMENT number 46, Minutes deleted for the following reason: No Notice of Electronic Filing created. Document will be re-docketed.(cbr)
2013-05-21
1
No Actions
STIPULATED ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc). Modified on 5/23/2013. (lc). (Entered: 05/23/2013)
2013-05-22
1
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) (Entered: 05/23/2013)
2013-05-22
1
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Mark L Blake on behalf of Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc (Blake, Mark) (Entered: 05/29/2013)
2013-05-29
1
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, re Stipulation 45 that Plaintiffs Local P.R. 3.1 & 3.2 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions and Document Production shall be extended from June 3, 2013 to June 10, 2013. (lc) (Entered: 06/03/2013)
2013-06-03
1
APPLICATION of Joshua B. Long to Withdraw as Attorney as counsel for Plaintiff filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. Application set for hearing on 7/8/2013 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 06/07/2013)
2013-06-07
1
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED APPLICATION OF JOSHUA B. LONG TO WITHDRAW ASCOUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF 51 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) (Entered: 06/07/2013)
2013-06-07
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to Amend its Patent L.R. 3.1 & 3.2 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions on Defendant Electronics For Imaging, Inc (Unopposed) filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 06/13/2013)
2013-06-13
1
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting 53 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Its Patent L.R. 3.1 & 3.2 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions to Defendant Electronics For Imaging, Inc. on or before 6/14/13. (lc) (Entered: 06/14/2013)
2013-06-13
1
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Bruce D Kuyper counsel for Defendant Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd. Bruce D. Kuyper is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co. Ltd.. (Kuyper, Bruce) (Entered: 06/14/2013)
2013-06-14
1
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Bruce D Kuyper counsel for Defendant Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd. Richard de Bodo is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co. Ltd.. (Kuyper, Bruce) (Entered: 06/14/2013)
2013-06-14
1
REQUEST to Substitute attorney Joshua M. Masur in place of attorney Jon W. Gurka, Reza Mirzaie, Damien Howard filed by Defendant General Imaging Company. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Masur, Joshua) Modified on 6/26/2013 (lc).(STRICKEN PER 6/26/13 ORDER). (Entered: 06/17/2013)
2013-06-17
1
REQUEST for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Canon Inc., Fujifilm Corporation, Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc, Nikon Corporation, Olympus Corporation, Olympus Imaging America Inc., Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd, Sigma Corporation, Sigma Corporation of America. (Broderick, Christopher) (Entered: 06/17/2013)
2013-06-17
1
Opposition re: REQUEST for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment 58 filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 06/25/2013)
2013-06-24
1
Notice of Electronic Filing re Objection/Opposition (Motion related) 59 bounced due to Attorney Jason Blake Cunningham no longer works at the firm.. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(vho) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/25/2013)
2013-06-25
1
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michelle Stover on behalf of Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc (Stover, Michelle) (Entered: 06/25/2013)
2013-06-25
1
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: REQUEST to Substitute attorney Joshua M. Masur in place of attorney Jon W. Gurka, Reza Mirzaie, Damien Howard 57, for the following reasons: : Document attached was docketed in correct case: SA CV 12-1680. Counsel e-filed on incorrect case number. Therefore the court strikes the document 57 . (lc) (Entered: 06/26/2013)
2013-06-26
1
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 58 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Defendants must file their motion and supporting documents by Wednesday, July 3, 2013, noticing a hearing for July 29, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff must file its opposition by Wednesday, July 10, 2013, and Defendants must their reply brief (if desired) by Wednesday, July 17, 2013. The Court does not believe that a full-scale claim construction is necessary at this stage, and the parties are requested to act accordingly. The page limits remain 25 for opening and opposition briefs, and 12 for the reply brief. Additionally, the Court will not alter the current case schedule because of this motion for summary judgment: the case schedule remains undisturbed, including the Markman hearing set for November 11, 2013. (cch) (Entered: 06/26/2013)
2013-06-26
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity filed by Defendants Fujifilm Corporation, Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc, Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd, Sigma Corporation, Sigma Corporation of America. Motion set for hearing on 7/29/2013 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Stmnt of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # 3 Declaration A. Yen, # 4 Exhibit A, # 5 Exhibit B, # 6 Exhibit C, # 7 Exhibit D, # 8 Proposed Order)(Broderick, Christopher) (Entered: 07/03/2013)
2013-07-03
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANTS ACER AMERICA CORPORATION AND ACER INC. filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/05/2013)
2013-07-05
1
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS ACER AMERICA CORPORATION AND ACER INC. 65 . All attorneys fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) Modified on 7/5/2013 (lc). (Entered: 07/05/2013)
2013-07-05
1
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS SONY CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA AND SONY ELECTRONICS INC with prejudice; Each party bear own costs and expenses by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
2013-07-08
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions and Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/5/2013 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Mark L. Blake, # 2 Exhibit 1-5, # 3 Exhibit 6-8, # 4 Exhibit 9-11, # 5 Exhibit 12, # 6 Exhibit 13-16, # 7 Exhibit 17-21, # 8 Exhibit 22-27, # 9 Proposed Order ISO Motion)(Blake, Mark) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
2013-07-08
1
NOTICE filed by Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc. of Manual Filing (Blake, Mark) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
2013-07-08
1
Application to File Under Seal - Exhibit 26 to the Declaration of Mark L. Blake re: MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions and Memorandum of Points and Authorities 68 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order re Application)(Blake, Mark) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
2013-07-08
1
SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc's Exhibit 26 to the Declaration of Mark L. Blake. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3)(mat) (Entered: 07/11/2013)
2013-07-09
1
ORDER GRANTING 70 DEFENDANT ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.S APPLICATION PURSUANTTO LOCAL RULE 79-5.1 TO FILE UNDER SEAL: EXHIBIT 26 TO THE DECLARATION OF MARK L.BLAKE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) (Entered: 07/10/2013)
2013-07-10
1
REQUEST to Substitute attorney Joshua M. Masur in place of attorney Jon W. Gurka, Reza Mirzaie, Damien Howard filed by Defendant General Imaging Company. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Masur, Joshua) (Entered: 07/10/2013)
2013-07-10
1
OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity 64 filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Cannizzo Declaration, # 2 Declaration Edmonds Declaration, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2 (part 1), # 5 Exhibit 2 (part 2), # 6 Supplement Statement of Disputed Facts)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/10/2013)
2013-07-10
1
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: granting 72 Request to Substitute Attorney Joshua M. Masur in place and instead of Jon W. Gurka on behalf of defendant General Imaging Company. (lc) (Entered: 07/11/2013)
2013-07-10
1
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Geoffrey K Gavin counsel for Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC. Geoffrey K. Gavin will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice.Geoffrey K. Gavin is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC. (Gavin, Geoffrey) (Entered: 07/12/2013)
2013-07-12
1
Opposition Opposition re: MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions and Memorandum of Points and Authorities 68 filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Declaration, # 4 Declaration)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/16/2013)
2013-07-16
1
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs claims for relief against Best Buy and Best Buys counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same. Case Terminated. Made JS-6., (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (cch) (Entered: 07/17/2013)
2013-07-16
1
NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR Re: Order Dismissing Case 78 Terminated Case. The Order Dismissing Case 78 was erroneously docketed in this case. This order should be docketed only in the case 8:12-cv-01669-ODW (MRWx). Due to the clerical error, the case was erroneously terminated; however, the error has been corrected and the case has been re-opened. (cch) (Entered: 07/17/2013)
2013-07-17
1
RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Invalidity 64 filed by Defendants Fujifilm Corporation, Konica Minolta Business Solutions USA Inc, Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd, Sigma Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 RESPONSE TO DIGITECHS STATEMENT OF GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT, # 2 Declaration of Andrew Yen, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2)(Broderick, Christopher) (Entered: 07/17/2013)
2013-07-17
1
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Hearing on MOTION for SummaryJudgment 64, scheduled for July 29, 2013 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. (lc) Modified on 7/19/2013 (lc). (Entered: 07/19/2013)
2013-07-19
1
REPLY in support of MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Infringement Contentions and Memorandum of Points and Authorities 68 filed by Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration (Reply) of Mark L. Blake, # 2 Exhibit 28-33 to Reply Declaration of Mark L. Blake, # 3 Exhibit 34-35 to Reply Declaration of Mark L. Blake, # 4 Exhibit 36-38 to Reply Declaration of Mark L. Blake)(Blake, Mark) (Entered: 07/22/2013)
2013-07-22
1
APPLICATION for Order for Filing Exhibits Under Seal filed by Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order to File Under Seal)(Blake, Mark) (Entered: 07/22/2013)
2013-07-22
1
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.S APPLICATIONPURSUANT TO L.R. 79-5.1 TO FILE UNDER SEAL: EXHIBITS 31 and 32 TO THE DECLARATION OF MARK L. BLAKE IN SUPPORT OF EFI REPLY TO ITS MOTION TOSTRIKE PLAINTIFFS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 83 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) (Entered: 07/23/2013)
2013-07-23
1
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The hearing on the MOTION to Strike 68 scheduled for August 5, 2013 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. (lc) Modified on 7/24/2013 (lc). (Entered: 07/24/2013)
2013-07-24
1
EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike New Evidence and Arguments made by Electronics for Imaging, Inc. re Reply (Motion related), 82 filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Proposed Order, # 6 Proposed Order)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 07/26/2013)
2013-07-26
1
OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike New Evidence and Arguments made by Electronics for Imaging, Inc. re Reply (Motion related), 82 86 filed by Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Frank P. Cote, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Cote, Frank) (Entered: 07/28/2013)
2013-07-28
1
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 64 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 7/31/2013.(lc). (Entered: 07/31/2013)
2013-07-31
1
ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In view of the Courts July 31, 2013 Order Granting Summary Judgment, the Court hereby DENIES the following pending motions: Electronics For Imaging, Inc.s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Infringement Contentions is DENIED AS MOOT (No. 8:12-cv-1324-ODW(MRWx), 68 ; Digitech Image Technologies LLCs Ex Parte Application is DENIED ASMOOT (No. 8:12-cv-1324-ODW(MRWx), 86 ; Ricoh Co., Ltd. and Ricoh Americans Corp.s Motion for Leave to File Third Party Complaint is DENIED (No. 8:12-cv-1689-ODW(MRWx), ECF No. 35); Xerox Corp.s Motion for Leave to File Third Party Complaint is DENIED (No. 8:12-cv-1693-ODW(MRWx), ECF No. 27);Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.s Motion for Leave to FileThird Party Complaint is DENIED (No. 8:12-cv-1694-ODW(MRWx), ECF No. 35).Further, in an abundance of caution, the Court hereby ORDERS all parties to file a joint status report by August 7, 2013. This report should be filed only in the lead case (No. 8:12-cv-1324-ODW(MRWx)), and must briefly state reasons why, in light of the Courts findings that claims 16, 9, 1015, and 2631 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101, the Court should not enter final judgment in favor of Defendants. For instance, though the Court believes this is not the case, it is conceivable that Digitech has asserted claims 78, 1625, or 3233 against one or more Defendants. There may also be other reasons unknown to the Court why it should not enter final judgment. (lc). Modified on 7/31/2013. (lc). (Entered: 07/31/2013)
2013-07-31
1
STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 08/05/2013)
2013-08-05
1
Joint STIPULATION to Continue Compliance with Patent Local Rule 4-2 from August 5, 2013 to Cancelled filed by plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 08/05/2013)
2013-08-05
1
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR CANCELATION OF PATENT RULE 4-2 DEADLINE 91 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) (Entered: 08/06/2013)
2013-08-06
1
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II :In light of the Courts Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment (Digitech Image Techs., LLC v. Elecs. for Imaging, Inc., No. 8:12-cv-1324-ODW(MRWx) (C.D. Cal. July 31, 2013) 88 and the parties representations in their August 5, 2013 Joint Status Report (Id. 90 ), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies, LLC shall take nothing; 2. Judgment for each of the Defendants in this and the related cases. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc) (Entered: 08/07/2013)
2013-08-06
1
REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 judgment) (lc) (Entered: 08/07/2013)
2013-08-07
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against All Plaintiffs RE: Judgment, 93 filed by Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/5/2013 at 09:00 AM before Clerk of Court. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Blake, Mark) (Entered: 08/20/2013)
2013-08-20
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer IncRE: Judgment, 93 filed by Defendant Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/5/2013 at 09:00 AM before Clerk of Court. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Masur, Joshua) (Entered: 08/20/2013)
2013-08-20
1
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Costs against All Plaintiffs RE: Judgment, 93 filed by Defendant General Imaging Company. Motion set for hearing on 9/5/2013 at 09:00 AM before Clerk of Court. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Gu, Zhuanjia) (Entered: 08/21/2013)
2013-08-21
1
NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. Appeal of Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 88, Judgment, 93 (Appeal fee of $455 receipt number 0973-12615642 paid.) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Order Granting Summary Judgment, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Joint Status Report, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Scheduling Conference Minutes)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 08/28/2013)
2013-08-28
1
TRANSMISSION of the Notice of Appeal, Docket Sheet, Judgment and or order e-mailed to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit re: Notice of Appeal to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, 98 (car)
2013-08-28
1
No Actions
OPPOSITION to MOTION for Costs against All Plaintiffs RE: Judgment, 93 95 filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 08/29/2013)
2013-08-29
1
OPPOSITION to MOTION for Costs against Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer IncRE: Judgment, 93 96 filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 08/29/2013)
2013-08-29
1
OPPOSITION to MOTION for Costs against All Plaintiffs RE: Judgment, 93 97 (General Imaging Company) filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 08/29/2013)
2013-08-29
1
REPLY filed by Defendant Electronics For Imaging Inc to MOTION for Costs against All Plaintiffs RE: Judgment, 93 95 (Blake, Mark) (Entered: 08/30/2013)
2013-08-30
1
OPPOSITION to MOTION for Costs against All Plaintiffs RE: Judgment, 93 95 Sur-Reply in Support of Objections filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 09/02/2013)
2013-09-02
1
REPLY Support MOTION for Costs against Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer IncRE: Judgment, 93 96 filed by Defendants Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc. (Gu, Zhuanjia) (Entered: 09/02/2013)
2013-09-02
1
REPLY Support MOTION for Costs against All Plaintiffs RE: Judgment, 93 97 filed by Defendant General Imaging Company. (Gu, Zhuanjia) (Entered: 09/02/2013)
2013-09-02
1
OPPOSITION to MOTION for Costs against Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer IncRE: Judgment, 93 96 Sur-Reply in Opposition filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Sur-Reply in Opposition to Electronics for Imaging's Bill of Costs)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 09/03/2013)
2013-09-03
1
OPPOSITION to MOTION for Costs against All Plaintiffs RE: Judgment, 93 97 Sur-Reply in Support of Opposition filed by Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Sur-Reply in Opposition to Electronics for Imaging's Bill of Costs)(Edmonds, John) (Entered: 09/03/2013)
2013-09-03
1
NOTIFICATION by Federal Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 13-1600, regarding Notice of Appeal to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, 98 as to Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC. (car) (Entered: 09/04/2013)
2013-09-04
1
TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies LLC Court Reporter. Court will contact John J. Edmonds at jedmonds@cepiplaw.com with any questions regarding this order. Transcript portion requested: Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the court reporter/recorder. (Edmonds, John) (Entered: 09/16/2013)
2013-09-16
1
REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 order) (lc) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/21/2014) (lc). (Main Document 110 replaced on 1/21/2014) (lc). (Entered: 01/21/2014)
2014-01-21
1
NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Report of Determination of Patent/Trademark Action (CLOSE) (AO 120) 110 was issued in error:1) pdfs were incorrect as to the reference and attachment of the 7/16/13 order; correct pdfs replaced. 2)However, this closing report was an erroneous duplicative report of one previously issued on 8/7/13, docket entry #94. (lc) (Entered: 01/21/2014)
2014-01-21
1
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Katherine J Santon counsel for Defendants Toshiba America Business Solutions Inc, Toshiba America Inc., Toshiba Corporation. Douglas F. Stewart is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Inc., and Toshiba America Business Solutions Inc.. (Santon, Katherine) (Entered: 01/23/2014)
2014-01-23
1
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney John Nolan Carter counsel for Defendant CDW LLC. John Nolan Carter is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant CDW, LLC. (Carter, John) (Entered: 02/04/2014)
2014-02-04
1
MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 98, CCA # 1600. The decision of the District Court is affirmed. Mandate received in this district on 8/18/14. (mat) (Entered: 08/20/2014)
2014-08-18
1
BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $ 217.77 in favor of General Imageing Co. and against Digitech Imagae Technologies LLC. RE: 93 97 (mb) (Entered: 09/29/2014)
2014-09-26
1
BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $ 1262.75 in favor of Electronics for Imaging Inc., et al. and against Digitech Image Technologies LLC. RE:, 93 95 (mb) (Entered: 09/29/2014)
2014-09-26
1
BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $ 185.40 in favor of ASUS computer Int'l, et al. and against Digitech Image Technologies LLC. RE: 93 96 (mb) (Entered: 09/29/2014)
2014-09-26
1