Gesture Technology Partners LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC
1:24-cv-09422
Overview
Case Number
1:24-cv-09422
Filing Date
2024-10-03
Status
Terminated
Termination Date
2025-01-10
Court
District Court, N.D. Illinois (ilnd)
Presiding Judge
Lindsay C. Jenkins
Nature of Suit
830 Patent
Jurisdiction Type
Federal Question
Cause of Action
15:1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demand
Both
Parties
Defendant
Motorola Mobility LLC
Represented By
6 Attorneys ListedDLA Piper LLP (US)
Tel: +1 (310) 595-3072
2000 Avenue of the Stars #400, Los Angeles, CA 90067
DLA Piper LLP (US)
Tel: +1 (619) 699-2700
Fax: +1 (619) 699-2701
4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100
Dla Piper Llp (us)
Tel: +1 (312) 368-4008
444 W. Lake St. #900, Chicago, IL 60606
Plaintiff
Gesture Technology Partners LLC
Represented By
5 Attorneys ListedWilliams Simons & Landis PLLC
Tel: +1 (512) 543-1357
2633 McKinney Ave., Suite 130 #366
Williams Simons & Landis PLLC
Tel: +1 (512) 543-1373
1735 Market Street, Suite 125 #453
Williams Simons and Landis PLLC
Tel: +1 (512) 543-1356
601 Congress Ave, Ste 600, The Littlefield Building
WILLIAMS SIMONS & LANDIS PLLC
Tel: +1 (512) 543-1359
601 Congress Ave., Suite 600, Austin TX, TX 78701
Court & Judges
Court
District Court, N.D. Illinois (ilnd)
Presiding Judge
Lindsay C. Jenkins
Patents Involved
No asserted patent numbers detected in initial docket filings yet.
Docket Entries
ORDER: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's unopposed motion for relief under FRCP 60(a) 159 is granted. On May 11, 2023, the court severed and stayed certain claims arising from the '924 patent, the '431 patent, the '949 patent, and the '079 patent, and directed that this case would proceed only on Claim 4 of the '949 Patent. Now that the court has resolved Claim 4 of the '949 Patent, the appropriate course would have been to continue the stay on the severed claims to preserve the applicable damages period. Instead, the Court mistakenly closed the case after entering judgment in favor of Defendants following summary judgment. Doing so was an oversight as contemplated by FRCP 60(a), and the Court regrets the error. The clerk is directed to open a new civil action and that action shall be titled Gesture Technology Partner, LLC v. Motorola Mobility, LLC. The Clerk shall assign the case directly to Judge Jenkins as presiding judge and Magistrate Judge Weisman as designated magistrate judge. The Clerk is further directed to docket under the new case number: (1) this Order as Docket Entry Number 1; (2) the Complaint from Case No. 22cv3535 [see Dkt. 1] as Docket Entry Number 2; and (3) the Answer to the Complaint [see Dkt. 18] as Docket Entry Number 3. The Court will separately set a date for the parties to update the Court on the continued need for the stay in light of other proceedings on the remaining patents. This case remains closed. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 10/2/2024: Mailed notice (jxm, ) (Entered: 10/03/2024)
2024-10-02
1
COMPLAINT filed by Gesture Technology Partners LLC; Jury Demand. (jxm, ) (Entered: 10/03/2024)
2024-10-02
1
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Motorola Mobility LLC(jxm, ) (Entered: 10/03/2024)
2024-10-02
1
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: This matter, which arose out of Case No. 23-cv-3535, remains stayed. The parties are to file a status report as to next steps for the case, including whether the stay should continue by December 3, 2024. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) (Entered: 10/03/2024)
2024-10-03
1