CasLoc logo
All Cases PTAB Litigations UPC Oppositions

Graywire, LLC v. Ciena Corp.

1:08-cv-02993

Overview

Case Number 1:08-cv-02993
Filing Date 2008-09-24
Status Terminated
Termination Date 2009-07-17
Court District Court, N.D. Georgia (gand)
Presiding Judge Steve C. Jones
Nature of Suit 830 Patent
Jurisdiction Type Federal Question
Cause of Action 28:1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demand Both

Parties

Plaintiff

Palomar Technologies, Inc.

Represented By

3 Attorneys Listed

JDS Uniphase Corp.

Represented By

3 Attorneys Listed

Robert Andrew King

Hunton & Williams LLP - Atlanta

Tel: +1 (404) 888-4136

Bank of America Plaza, Suite 4100, 600 Peachtree Street NE

Matthew A. Stump

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP-MN

Tel: +1 (612) 766-7000

90 South Seventh Street, 2200 Wells Fargo Center

Kenneth A. Liebman

Faegre & Benson

Tel: +1 (612) 766-7000

Faegre & Benson, 90 South Seventh Street

Defendant

Newport Corp.

Represented By

2 Attorneys Listed

John P. Passarelli

Kutak Rock LLP-NE

Tel: +1 (402) 346-6000

1650 Farnam Street, Omaha, NE 68102

Joyce F. Mocek

Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP

Tel: +1 (770) 818-0000
Fax: +1 (770) 937-9960

100 Galleria Parkway, Suite 1600

Ciena Corp.

Represented By

4 Attorneys Listed

Court & Judges

Court

District Court, N.D. Georgia (gand)

Presiding Judge

Steve C. Jones

Patents Involved

2 Patents

There are 2 patents involved in this case.

Docket Entries

COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, filed by Graywire, LLC.; and Summon(s) issued. Consent form to proceed before U.S. Magistrate and pretrial instructions provided. ( Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 4820.) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Summons, # 5 Civil Cover Sheet)(epm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. (Entered: 09/26/2008)

2008-09-24
1

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Graywire, LLC..(epm) (Entered: 09/26/2008)

2008-09-24
1

AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (epm) (Entered: 09/26/2008)

2008-09-26
1

ORDER: The Plaintiff is hereby given notice that it must show cause to this court as to why service has not been timely effected, or, alternatively, that service has in fact been properly effected, within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order on the courts docket. Failure to make such a showing to this court will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Beverly B. Martin on 1/26/09. (aaq) (Entered: 01/27/2009)

2009-01-26
1

Track Case Updates

Automated email notifications for new filings & decisions

Identifier: •

Free service • 1-click unsubscribe anytime • Powered by CasLoc