CasLoc logo
All Cases PTAB Litigations UPC Oppositions

Qinetiq Limited v. Oclaro Inc.

1:09-cv-00372

Overview

Case Number 1:09-cv-00372
Filing Date 2009-05-27
Status Terminated
Termination Date 2010-01-04
Court District Court, D. Delaware (ded)
Presiding Judge Vacant Judgeship (2006)
Nature of Suit 830 Patent
Jurisdiction Type Federal Question
Cause of Action 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demand Plaintiff

Parties

Defendant

Oclaro Inc.

Represented By

4 Attorneys Listed

Thomas C. Grimm

Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell

Tel: +1 (302) 658-9200

Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, 1201 North Market Street

Thomas J. Friel , Jr.

Email: tfriel@cooley.com

Wayne O. Stacy

Email: wstacy@cooley.com

Carolyn V. Juarez

Email: cjuarez@cooley.com

Plaintiff

Qinetiq Limited

Represented By

6 Attorneys Listed

David Ellis Moore

Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP

Tel: +1 (302) 984-6000

1313 N. Market St., Hercules Plaza, 6th Flr., P.O. Box 951

Richard L. Horwitz

Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP

Tel: +1 (302) 984-6000

1313 N. Market St., Hercules Plaza, 6th Flr., P.O. Box 951

Tzung-Lin Fu

Email: tfu@kayescholer.com

Stephen J. Elliott

Email: selliott@kayescholer.com

Soumitra Deka

Email: sdeka@kayescholer.com

James S. Blank

Email: jblank@kayescholer.com

Court & Judges

Court

District Court, D. Delaware (ded)

Presiding Judge

Vacant Judgeship (2006)

Patents Involved

No asserted patent numbers detected in initial docket filings yet.

Docket Entries

Docket documents haven't synced yet — they're refreshed once a day. Check back soon, or open the CasLoc app for the live view in the meantime.

Track Case Updates

Automated email notifications for new filings & decisions

Identifier: •

Free service • 1-click unsubscribe anytime • Powered by CasLoc