Rothschild v. Cree, Inc.
7:05-cv-05939
Overview
Case Number
7:05-cv-05939
Filing Date
2005-06-27
Status
Terminated
Termination Date
2010-01-28
Court
District Court, S.D. New York (nysd)
Presiding Judge
William G. Young
Nature of Suit
830 Patent
Jurisdiction Type
Federal Question
Cause of Action
35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demand
Both
Parties
Defendant
Cree, Inc.
Represented By
4 Attorneys ListedThermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Tel: +1 (760) 603-7200
5791 Van Allen Way, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Tel: +1 (650) 802-3000
201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP (NYC)
Tel: +1 (212) 310-8000
Fax: +1 (212) 833-3148
767 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10153
MYERS, BIGEL, SIBLEY, AND SAJOVEC
Tel: +1 (919) 854-1400
Fax: +1 (919) 854-1401
MYERS, BIGEL, SIBLEY, AND SAJOVEC, 4140 PARKLAKE AVENUE
Plaintiff
Gertrude Neumark Rothschild
Represented By
7 Attorneys ListedDesmarais LLP
Tel: +1 (212) 351-4906
Fax: +1 (212) 351-3401
230 Park Avenue, 26th Floor
Troutman Sanders, LLP (Atlanta)
Fax: +1 (404) 885-3900
600 Peachtree Street, Ne, Suite 5200, Atlanta, GA 30308
Albert Jacobs LLP
Tel: +1 (212) 508-7533
Fax: +1 (212) 508-7541
900 Third Avenue, Suite 502
Troutman Sanders LLP (NYC)
Tel: +1 (212) 704-6218
875 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022
Sidley Austin LLP (NY)
Tel: +1 (212) 839-5852
Fax: +1 (212) 839-5599
787 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019
Jacobs Albert, LLP
Tel: +1 (212) 508-7528
Fax: +1 (212) 508-7541
900 Third Avenue, Suite 502
Kasowitz, Benson, Torres LLP (NYC)
Tel: +1 (212) 506-1986
Fax: +1 (212) 506-1800
1633 Broadway, New York, NY 10019
Court & Judges
Court
District Court, S.D. New York (nysd)
Presiding Judge
William G. Young
Patents Involved
There is a single patent involved in this case.
| Application Number | Patent Number | External Links |
|---|---|---|
| - | US4904618 |
Docket Entries
COMPLAINT against Cree, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 250.00, Receipt Number 538949)Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(mde, )
2005-06-27
1
Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith is so designated. (mde, )
2005-06-27
1
No Actions
Case Designated ECF. (mde, )
2005-06-27
1
No Actions
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Cree, Inc.. (mde, )
2005-06-27
1
No Actions
Mailed notice to Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to report the filing of this action. (mde, )
2005-06-27
1
No Actions
STIPULATION AND ORDER: time for dft to respond to the Complaint filed by plntff on 6/27/05 is extended through and including 9/30/05. So Ordered: (Signed by Judge Stephen C. Robinson on 9/12/05) Copies sent by Clerk's Office.(pf, )
2005-09-13
1
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge William C. Conner. Judge Stephen C. Robinson no longer assigned to the case. (fk, )
2005-09-13
1
RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2005-09-30
1
ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND., COUNTERCLAIM against Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2005-09-30
1
REPLY re: [5] Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Toren, Peter)
2005-10-20
1
CONSENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND JOINT REPORT PURSUANT TO RULE 26(f), FRCP:... Rule 26(a) discovery by 12/12/05; No additional parties joined after 12/30/05; Fact discovery completed by 10/2/06; Expert Reports pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2) for any issue on which a party carries the burden of proof served by 11/16/06; Expert rebuttal reports served by 12/18/06; Expert discovery completed by 1/18/07.... So Ordered: (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 11/14/05) Copies seny by Chambers.(pf, )
2005-11-14
1
MEMORANDUM TO THE DOCKET CLERK: Initial Conference held on 11/18/05 before Judge William C. Conner. No Court Reporter.(ae, )
2005-11-18
1
No Actions
NOTICE of Change of Firm Name. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild, Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Toren, Peter)
2005-12-21
1
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Todd Lawrence Krause on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild, Gertrude Neumark Rothschild (Krause, Todd)
2006-01-11
1
STIPULATION AND INTERIM CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER:... So Ordered: (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 4/10/06) Copies sent by Chambers.(pf, )
2006-04-10
1
AMENDED CONSENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND JOINT REPORT Pursuant to Rule 26(f), F.R.C.P..SO ORDERED: (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 6/7/2006) "Copies Sent By Chambers".(mde, )
2006-06-07
1
AMENDED CONSENT SCHEDULING ORDER...So Ordered (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 6/21/06) (fk, )
2006-06-21
1
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING FOR NON-ECF DOCUMENT - MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro hac vice of D. Randel Ayers. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) # (2) Affidavit)(Radulescu, David) Modified on 10/16/2006 (fk, ).
2006-10-11
1
***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney David Constantine Radulescu to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document No. 13 Motion for Pro Hac Vice along with the $25.00 fee. This document is not filed via ECF. (fk, )
2006-10-16
1
No Actions
NOTICE and MOTION for DAVID R. AYERS to Appear Pro Hac Vice including supporting documents: Declaration and Certificate of Good Standing. Document filed by Cree, Inc., Cree, Inc.. (gco, )
2006-10-17
1
ORDER ADMITTING ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. Attorney DAVID R AYERS for Cree, Inc. admitted Pro Hac Vice. Receipt #E590225. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 10/18/2006) "Copies Mailed By Chambers".(gco, )
2006-10-18
1
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C. Conner : Pre-Motion Conference held on 12/20/2006. Remark: No Court Reporter. (Submitted by Gina Sicora). (mde, )
2006-12-20
1
No Actions
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Asheesh Paul Puri on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild (Puri, Asheesh)
2007-01-22
1
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Asheesh Paul Puri on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. New Address: Sidley Austin LLP, 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York, USA 10019, (212) 839-5300. (Puri, Asheesh)
2007-01-22
1
BRIEF Plaintiff Gertrude Neumark Rothschild's Opening Brief On Claim Construction. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-02-20
1
DECLARATION of Asheesh P. Puri in Support re: [18] Brief. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1# (2) Exhibit 2# (3) Exhibit 3# (4) Exhibit 4# (5) Exhibit 5# (6) Exhibit 6# (7) Errata 7# (8) Exhibit 8# (9) Exhibit 9# (10) Exhibit 10)(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-02-20
1
BRIEF Defendant Cree, Inc's Opening Brief On Claim Construction. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix Appendix 1# (2) Appendix Appendix 2# (3) Appendix Appendix 3# (4) Exhibit Exhibit A# (5) Exhibit Exhibit B# (6) Exhibit Exhibit C# (7) Exhibit Exhibit D# (8) Exhibit Exhibit E# (9) Exhibit Exhibit F# (10) Exhibit Exhibit G# (11) Exhibit Exhibit H# (12) Exhibit Exhibit I# (13) Exhibit Exhibit J# (14) Exhibit Exhibit K# (15) Exhibit Exhibit L# (16) Exhibit Exhibit M# (17) Exhibit Exhibit N# (18) Exhibit Exhibit O# (19) Exhibit Exhibit P# (20) Exhibit Exhibit Q# (21) Exhibit Exhibit R# (22) Exhibit Exhibit S# (23) Exhibit Exhibit T# (24) Exhibit Exhibit U)(Radulescu, David)
2007-02-20
1
AMENDED CONSENT SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties have stipulated to extending all future scheduling dates in this action, previously set forth in the June 21, 2006 Scheduling Order, by two months to accommodate the time for the parties to complete fact discovery.....see order for details..... (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 03/02/2007) (jma)
2007-03-02
1
STIPULATED FINAL PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material.... (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 03/02/2007) (jma)
2007-03-02
1
BRIEF Defendant Cree, Inc.'s Reply Claim Construction Brief. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix Appendix 4# (2) Exhibit Exhibit AA# (3) Exhibit Exhibit BB# (4) Exhibit Exhibit CC# (5) Exhibit Exhibit DD# (6) Exhibit Exhibit EE# (7) Exhibit Exhibit FF# (8) Exhibit Exhibit GG# (9) Exhibit Exhibit HH# (10) Exhibit Exhibit II# (11) Exhibit Exhibit JJ# (12) Exhibit Exhibit KK# (13) Exhibit Exhibit LL# (14) Exhibit Exhibit MM# (15) Exhibit Exhibit NN# (16) Exhibit Exhibit OO# (17) Exhibit Exhibit PP# (18) Exhibit Exhibit QQ# (19) Exhibit Exhibit RR# (20) Exhibit Exhibit SS# (21) Exhibit Exhibit TT)(Radulescu, David)
2007-03-08
1
BRIEF Plaintiff Gertrude Neumark Rothschild's Response To Cree, Inc.'s Claim Construction Brief. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-03-08
1
DECLARATION of Asheesh P. Puri in Support re: [24] Brief. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 11# (2) Exhibit 12# (3) Exhibit 13)(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-03-08
1
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C. Conner : Markman Hearing held on 3/19/2007. Markman Hearing held. Attorney's to file supplemental briefs (10) page limit one week after receiving transcript. (Court Reporter Angela O' Donnell) (jma)
2007-03-19
1
No Actions
TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on March 19, 2007 before Judge William C. Conner. Court Reporter: Angela A. O'Donnell. (br)
2007-04-10
1
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF Defendant Cree, Inc.'s Supplemental Brief on Claim Construction. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1# (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2# (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3# (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4# (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5# (6) Exhibit Exhibit 6# (7) Exhibit Exhibit 7# (8) Exhibit Exhibit 8# (9) Exhibit Exhibit 9# (10) Exhibit Exhibit 10)(Radulescu, David)
2007-04-17
1
BRIEF Supplemental Claim Construction Brief. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-04-17
1
DECLARATION of Asheesh P. Puri in Support re: [29] Brief. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A# (2) Exhibit B# (3) Errata C# (4) Exhibit D# (5) Exhibit E# (6) Exhibit F# (7) Exhibit G)(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-04-18
1
BRIEF re: [29] Brief Cree's Combined Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply and Cree's Sur-Reply to Neumark's Supplemental Claim Construction Brief. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2007-04-20
1
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING FOR NON-ECF DOCUMENT - RESPONSE re: [31] Brief Response Letter to Cree's Sur-Reply. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Puri, Asheesh) Modified on 4/26/2007 (Keegan, Fiona).
2007-04-24
1
OPPOSITION BRIEF re: [31] Brief Opposition to Cree's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-reply.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-04-26
1
***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Asheesh Paul Puri to MANUALLY RE-FILE by sending to chambers Document No. 32 LETTER. This document is not filed via ECF. The Judges Chambers already has the Original Letter. (fk)
2007-04-26
1
No Actions
OPINION AND ORDER #07,0024WP...The Court therefore concludes that the term "doping...with...atomic hydrogen" should be construed to mean: incorporating atomic hydrogen not produced by disintegration of ambient gases. SO ORDERED: (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 5/3/2007) "Copies Sent By Chambers".(mde)
2007-05-03
1
AMENDED CONSENT SCHEDULING ORDER AND JOINT REPORT PURSUANT TO RULE 26(f) RED.R.CIV.P.: FAct discovery 9/17/07; Expert reports 10/29/07; Expert rebuttal 12/5/07; Expert Discovery 1/15/08;...So Ordered. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 5/16/07) (fk)
2007-05-16
1
MOTION for Reconsideration re; [34] Order, Notice of Motion For Clarification Or, In The Alternative, Reconsideration Of Claim Construction Opinion And Order. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-05-17
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [35] MOTION for Reconsideration re; [34] Order, Notice of Motion For Clarification Or, In The Alternative, Reconsideration Of Claim Construction Opinion And Order.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1# (2) Exhibit 2)(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-05-17
1
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Peter Jonathan Toren on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. New Address: Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, 1633 Broadway, New York, New York, United States 10019, 212-506-1986. (Toren, Peter)
2007-05-21
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [35] MOTION for Reconsideration re; [34] Order, Notice of Motion For Clarification Or, In The Alternative, Reconsideration Of Claim Construction Opinion And Order.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2007-06-05
1
RESPONSE in Support re: [35] MOTION for Reconsideration re; [34] Order, Notice of Motion For Clarification Or, In The Alternative, Reconsideration Of Claim Construction Opinion And Order.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Puri, Asheesh)
2007-06-18
1
OPINION AND ORDER, # 07, 0033 WP re: [35] MOTION for Reconsideration re; [34] Order, Notice of Motion For Clarification Or, In The Alternative, Reconsideration Of Claim Construction Opinion And Order. filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild....Plaintiff Gertrude Neumark Rothchild moves for reconsideration of clarification of this Court's Opinion and Order dated May 3, 2007 construing certain terms of the claims of plaintiff's U.S. patents Nos. 4,904,618 and 4,252,499 (the '''618 patent''' and ''' 499''' respectively) following a Markman hearing on March 19, 2007. Familiarity with that Opinion and Order is assumed. For the reasons stated hereinafter, plaintiff's motion is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff also asks the Court to adopt the construction of claim terms agreed upon by the parties; that request is unopposed and is granted...see order for more details... (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 07/02/2007) (jma)
2007-07-02
1
JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time of Case Deadlines. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2007-08-01
1
AMENDED CONSENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Based upon the joint motion of Plaintiff Gertrude Neumark Rothschild and defendant Cree, Inc. dated August 1, 2007, good cause having been shown, each of deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order entered in May 16, 2007 is hereby extended by ninety days. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 08/03/07) (dcr)
2007-08-03
1
MOTION for Protective Order ATMI'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Affidavit Declaration of Lynne Borchers# (2) Exhibit Exhibit A# (3) Exhibit Exhibit B# (4) Exhibit Exhibit C# (5) Exhibit Exhibit D)(Radulescu, David)
2007-08-31
1
RESPONSE to Motion re: [44] MOTION for Protective Order ATMI'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A# (2) Exhibit Exhibit B# (3) Exhibit Exhibit C# (4) Affidavit Asheesh Puri Declaration)(Puri, Asheesh)
2007-09-07
1
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C. Conner : Pretrial Conference, Pre-Motion Conference held on 9/14/2007. No Court Reporter. Pending motion for preotective order will be withdrawn. Submiteed by Gina Sicora. (cg)
2007-09-14
1
No Actions
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C. Conner: Discovery Hearing held on 12/5/2007. No Court reporter. Disputes resolved. (jma)
2007-12-05
1
No Actions
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C. Conner: Discovery Dispute Conference held on 12/12/2007. No Court Reporter. (gco)
2007-12-12
1
No Actions
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C. Conner: Telephone Conference held on 2/29/2008, Discovery Hearing held on 2/29/2008, Pre-Motion Conference held on 2/29/2008, ( Motions due by 3/21/2008., Responses due by 4/11/2008, Replies due by 4/18/2008.). No Court Reporter. Dispute Resolved. Defendants may file motion for summary judgment as follows: moving papers due 3/21/08, responses due 04/11/08, and reply due 04/18/08 (gco)
2008-02-29
1
No Actions
SCHEDULING ORDER:...Deadline for responses to Contention Interrogatories on Issues where the responding party bears the burden of proof: Later of 4/7/08 or 30 days after service; Deadline for responses to Contention Interrogatories on Issues where the responding party does not bear the burden of proof: Later of 5/6/08 or 30 days after service; Discovery due by 6/6/2008; Motions due by 7/9/2008; Opposition Briefs: 25 Days after motion filed; Reply Briefs: 14 days after Opposition filed; Expert Reports: 45 days after Summary Judgment Ruling; Rebuttal Expert Reports: 80 Days after Summary Judgment Ruling; Close of Expert Discovery: 115 Days after Summary Judgment Ruling....So Ordered (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 3/3/08) (fk)
2008-03-03
1
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C. Conner: Telephone Conference held on 5/7/2008, Discovery Hearing held on 5/7/2008. No Court Reporter. (gco)
2008-05-07
1
No Actions
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Daniel Allen Ladow on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild (Ladow, Daniel)
2008-05-22
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Further Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2008-06-16
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Support re: [50] Reply Memorandum of Law. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 12, # (2) Exhibit 13, # (3) Exhibit 14)(Radulescu, David)
2008-06-16
1
SCHEDULING ORDER:...Close of fact Discovery 7/25/08; Summary Judgment Motions due 8/28/08; Opposirion to Motions due 25 Days After Motion Filed; Reply Briefs due 14 Days After Opposition Filed; Deadline for Serving Opening Expert Reports 45 Days After Summary Judgment Ruling; Deadline for Serving Rebuttal Expert Reports 80 Days After Summary Judgment Ruling; and Close of Expert Discovery 115 Days After Summary Judgement Ruling. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 7/2/08) (fk)
2008-07-02
1
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C. Conner: Settlement Conference held on 7/9/2008. No court reporter. Parties will notify the Court if action settles. (gco)
2008-07-09
1
No Actions
OPINION AND ORDER:... CONCLUSION: For the foregoing reasons, Cree's motion for partial summary judgment is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 07/14/2008) (gco)
2008-07-16
1
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Summary Judgment Motions due by 11/7/2008. Close of Fact Discovery due by 9/8/2008. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 07/25/2008) (gco)
2008-07-25
1
MOTION for Reconsideration of Opinion and Order Denying Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2008-07-25
1
OPINION AND ORDER re: [56] MOTION for Reconsideration of Opinion and Order Denying Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. filed by Cree, Inc........Cree has pointed out no controlling decisions or critical facts overlooked by the Court in its Opinion and Order denying Cree's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Cree's Motion for Reconsideration of that decision is therefore denied. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 08/01/2008) (jma)
2008-08-01
1
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William C. Conner: Settlement Conference held on 8/1/2008. No Court Reporter. No settlement. (gco)
2008-08-01
1
No Actions
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Albert Lionel Jacobs on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild (Attachments: # (1) Notice of Appearance)(Jacobs, Albert)
2008-08-12
1
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Summary Judgment Motions due by 12/22/2008. Close of Fact Discovery due by 10/23/2008. Deadline for filing Summary Judgment Opposition Briefs - 40 days after motion filed. Deadline for filinf Summary Judgment Reply Briefs - 14 days after opposition filed. Expert reports served by - 45 days after Summary Judgment Ruling. Rebuttal Expert Reports due by - 80 days after Summary Judgment Ruling. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 9/5/08) (fk)
2008-09-05
1
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER:.....Close of Fact Discovery 12/23/2008; Deadline for summary judgment motions 02/23/2009; Deadline for summary judgment opposition.... (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 10/17/2008) (jma)
2008-10-17
1
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Daniel Allen Ladow on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. New Address: Albert Jacobs LLP, 900 Third Avenue, Suite 502, New York, New York, USA 10022, (212) 508-7532. (Ladow, Daniel)
2008-12-16
1
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Albert Lionel Jacobs on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. New Address: Albert Jacobs LLP, 900 Third Avenue, Suite 502, New York, New York, USA 10022, (212) 508-7528. (Jacobs, Albert)
2008-12-16
1
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff Professor Neumark Rothschild and defendant Cree, Inc. hereby jointly submit the following amended scheduling order... Motions due by 3/16/2009. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 12/19/2008) (gco)
2008-12-22
1
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER:Close of Fact Discovery 12/23/08,Close of Discovery Directed to Deposition of James Harrington and documents 3/13/09, Deadline for filing Summary Judgment Motions due by 3/30/2009,Deadline for filing Summary Judgment Opposition Briefs 25 days after motion filed, Deadline for filing Summary Judgment Reply Briefs 14 days after Opposition filed, Deadline for serving Opening Expert Reports 45 days after Summary Judgment Ruling, Deadline for serving Rebuttal Expert Reports 80 days After Summary Judgment Ruling,Close of Expert Discovery 115 Days After Summary Judgment Ruling. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 3/3/2009) Copies Emailed to counsel of record by Chambers.(rj)
2009-03-03
1
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions due by 9/15/2009. Discovery due by 8/14/2009. Ready for Trial by 2/1/2010... Plaintiff Professor Gertrude Neumark Rothschild and defendant Cree, Inc. hereby jointly I submit the following amended scheduling order which sets the schedule for expert discovery, the filing of summary judgment motions, and trial. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William C. Conner on 05/18/2009) (gco)
2009-05-18
1
NOTICE With the exception of the following two cases, Lewis v. Northeast Credit & Collections, et al., 07 Civ. 11593, and ASCAP v. Yaquina Bay Communications, Inc., 41 Civ. 1395, all cases on the docket of Judge William C. Conner have been adjourned pending reassignment. Counsel in all of those cases are reminded that a magistrate judge has been designated and are urged to consider consenting to trial before a White Plains magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636. Inquiries may be directed to Robert Rogers, Deputy-in-Charge at 914-390-4001.The following two proceedings will go forward at the times noted below before another judge in the White Plains Courthouse:Sept. 2 at 10:15 a.m. - 07 Civ. 11593 Lewis v. Northeast Credit & Collections, et al. (Settlement hearing)Sept. 4 at 11:45 a.m. - 41 Civ. 1395 ASCAP v. Yaquina Bay Communications, Inc. (Hearing for Enforcement of Final Order) (mj)
2009-07-15
1
ORDER OF WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL OF RECORD: Sidley Austin LLP, with consent of Plaintiff, hereby withdraws as counsel of record in the above- captioned action... Todd Lawrence Krause and Asheesh Paul Puri terminated. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Stephen C. Robinson on 07/16/2009) (gco)
2009-07-17
1
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Daniel Allen Ladow on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. New Address: Troutman Sanders LLP, The Chrysler Building, 405 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, U.S.A. 10174-0700, (212) 704-6218. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-07-20
1
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Albert Lionel Jacobs on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. New Address: Troutman Sanders LLP, The Chrysler Building, 405 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, U.S.A. 10174-0700, (212) 704-6218. (Jacobs, Albert)
2009-07-20
1
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge William G. Young. Judge William C. Conner is no longer assigned to the case. (fk)
2009-07-23
1
MOTION for Protective Order Modification to Include Two Additional Categories. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Jacobs, Albert)
2009-09-01
1
JOINT MOTION for Extension of Time and amended scheduling order. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-09-03
1
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting [73] Motion for Extension of Time. (Signed by Judge William G. Young on 9/9/09) (fk)
2009-09-09
1
NOTICE : This case has been reassigned to William G. Young, USDJ. Judge Young is a district court judge in the District of Massachusetts sitting by designation on several cases out of the White Plains Division of the Southern District of New York. In order to facilitate the handling of these cases,please comply with the following requirements. All contact is to be made with the Courtroom Deputy Clerk for Judge Young. Her name is Bonnie Smith. She can be reached at 617 -748 -9156 orBonnie_Smith@mad.uscourts.gov. Judge Young will set all dispositive motions for hearing. The hearings will take place in a courtroom in the White Plains Courthouse by way of video. Counsel will report to the courthouse and Judge Young will participate by video from Boston. Judge Young does not accept letter motions. All requests for anything are to be done by way of ECF Motion in the case. Courtesy copies of all pleadings are to be sent to: Bonnie Smith USDC Clerks Office Suite 2300 1 Courthouse Way Boston, MA 02210. (fk)
2009-09-10
1
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER re: [72] Motion for Protective Order....ENDORSEMENT: Pursuant to par. 4B(e) and 5(d) of the Final Protective Order nothing shall be filed in this Court in camera. There must first be a motion demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that the data qualifies as a trade secret and the action cannot proceed without its consideration.So Ordered as modified this 11 day of Sept. 2009. (Signed by Judge William G. Young on 9/11/09) (fk)
2009-09-11
1
MOTION Motion to Remove Peter Toren of Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP as Counsel for Plaintiff. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Jacobs, Albert)
2009-09-14
1
RESPONSE in Opposition re: [72] MOTION for Protective Order Modification to Include Two Additional Categories.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-09-15
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [72] MOTION for Protective Order Modification to Include Two Additional Categories.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Radulescu, David)
2009-09-15
1
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting [77] Motion To Remove Peter Toren....ENDORSEMENT: Motion Allowed. (Signed by Judge William G. Young on 9/21/09) (fk)
2009-09-21
1
*** Attorney Peter Jonathan Toren terminated. (fk)
2009-09-21
1
No Actions
MOTION for Matthew D. Powers to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Amount Paid: $25.00, Receipt Number: 701879. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(mml)
2009-09-30
1
MOTION for RIP FINST to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Fee Paid: $25.00, Receipt Number: 701819. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(mml)
2009-09-30
1
ORDER granting [81] Motion for Matthew D. Powers to Appear Pro Hac Vice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William G. Young on 10/2/2009) (mml)
2009-10-02
1
ORDER Upon reconsideration, the Court denies the motion to amend the protective order, although the prohibition against filing confidential materials with the Court remains. This ruling expresses no olpinion whatsoever concerning whether Rothschild may introduce the licensing agreements in evidence for any relevant reason. (Signed by Judge William G. Young on 10/02/2009) (jma)
2009-10-02
1
ORDER granting [84] Motion for RIP FINST to Appear Pro Hac Vice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William G. Young on 10/2/2009) (mml)
2009-10-02
1
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gerard F Diebner on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-05
1
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Gerard F Diebner on behalf of Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. New Address: Troutman Sanders LLP, The Chrysler Building, 405 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, U.S.A. 10174, (212) 704-6000. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-05
1
CASHIERS OFFICE REMARK on 81 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, 84 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice in the amount of $50.00, paid on 09/30/2009, Receipt Number 701819. (jd)
2009-10-07
1
No Actions
MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-09
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-09
1
DECLARATION of Gerard F. Diebner in Support re: [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B)(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-09
1
MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-09
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-09
1
- FILING ERROR - WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - DECLARATION of Gerard F. Diebner in Support re: [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4)(Diebner, Gerard) Modified on 10/23/2009 (gco).
2009-10-09
1
MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-09
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-09
1
- FILING ERROR - WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - DECLARATION of Gerard F. Diebner in Support re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Diebner, Gerard) Modified on 10/23/2009 (gco).
2009-10-09
1
MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 1 and 4 Of The '618 Patent Based On The Crowder References. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-09
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [97] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 1 and 4 Of The '618 Patent Based On The Crowder References.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-09
1
RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-09
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [97] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 1 and 4 Of The '618 Patent Based On The Crowder References.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-09
1
MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Cree's Motion [No.3] For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-09
1
MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Memorandum in Support of Motion [No.3] For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-09
1
MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Cree's Motion [No.2] For Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Motion [No.2] for Summary Judgement of Patent Invalidity. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of Dr. Eric Bretschneider in Support re: [104] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Motion [No.2] for Summary Judgement of Patent Invalidity.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A)(Radulescu, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/15/2009: # (2) Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit, # (6) Exhibit, # (7) Exhibit, # (8) Exhibit, # (9) Exhibit, # (10) Exhibit, # (11) Exhibit, # (12) Exhibit) (jma). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/15/2009: # (13) Exhibit, # (14) Exhibit, # (15) Exhibit, # (16) Exhibit) (jma).
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of James Harrington in Support re: [102] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Memorandum in Support of Motion [No.3] For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
MOTION to Compel /Require Cree, Inc. To Elect One Semiconductor Expert Pursuant to The Scheduling Orders. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [107] MOTION to Compel /Require Cree, Inc. To Elect One Semiconductor Expert Pursuant to The Scheduling Orders.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [107] MOTION to Compel /Require Cree, Inc. To Elect One Semiconductor Expert Pursuant to The Scheduling Orders.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of David Radulescu in Support re: [104] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Motion [No.2] for Summary Judgement of Patent Invalidity.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B, # (3) Appendix C, # (4) Exhibit 1, # (5) Exhibit 2, # (6) Exhibit 3, # (7) Exhibit 4, # (8) Exhibit 5, # (9) Exhibit 6, # (10) Exhibit 7-1, # (11) Exhibit 7-2, # (12) Exhibit 8, # (13) Exhibit 9, # (14) Exhibit 10, # (15) Exhibit 11, # (16) Exhibit 12, # (17) Exhibit 13, # (18) Exhibit 14-1, # (19) Exhibit 14-2, # (20) Exhibit 15, # (21) Exhibit 16, # (22) Exhibit 17-1, # (23) Exhibit 17-2, # (24) Exhibit 18, # (25) Exhibit 19, # (26) Exhibit 20, # (27) Exhibit 21, # (28) Exhibit 22, # (29) Exhibit 23, # (30) Exhibit 24, # (31) Exhibit 25, # (32) Exhibit 26, # (33) Exhibit 27, # (34) Exhibit 28, # (35) Exhibit 29)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of David Radulescu in Support re: [101] MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Cree's Motion [No.3] For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16-1, # (17) Exhibit 16-2, # (18) Exhibit 17, # (19) Exhibit 18, # (20) Exhibit 19, # (21) Exhibit 20, # (22) Exhibit 21, # (23) Exhibit 22, # (24) Exhibit 23, # (25) Exhibit 24, # (26) Exhibit 25)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [114] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [114] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
- FILING ERROR - WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [114] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20, # (21) Exhibit 21, # (22) Exhibit 22, # (23) Exhibit 23, # (24) Exhibit 24, # (25) Exhibit 25, # (26) Exhibit)(Ladow, Daniel) Modified on 10/23/2009 (gco).
2009-10-10
1
MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant Cree, Inc's 35 U.S.C.Section 102 (f) Defense. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [119] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant Cree, Inc's 35 U.S.C.Section 102 (f) Defense.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. Document filed by Cree, Inc..(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
- FILING ERROR - WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [119] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant Cree, Inc's 35 U.S.C.Section 102 (f) Defense.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20, # (21) Exhibit 21, # (22) Exhibit 22, # (23) Exhibit 23, # (24) Exhibit 24, # (25) Exhibit 25, # (26) Exhibit 26)(Ladow, Daniel) Modified on 10/23/2009 (gco).
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of Dr. Eric Bretschneider in Support re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A)(Radulescu, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/15/2009: # (2) Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit, # (6) Exhibit, # (7) Exhibit, # (8) Exhibit, # (9) Exhibit, # (10) Exhibit, # (11) Exhibit, # (12) Exhibit, # (13) Exhibit, # (14) Exhibit, # (15) Exhibit, # (16) Exhibit) (jma).
2009-10-10
1
MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [126] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-10
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [129] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-10
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [129] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-10
1
- FILING ERROR - WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [126] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20, # (21) Exhibit 21, # (22) Exhibit 22, # (23) Exhibit 23, # (24) Exhibit 24, # (25) Exhibit 25, # (26) Exhibit 26)(Ladow, Daniel) Modified on 10/23/2009 (gco).
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [129] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6)(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-10
1
RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-10
1
MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 10, 12 and 16 Of the '499 Patent Based on the Jacob, Ohki and Stucheli References. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [134] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 10, 12 and 16 Of the '499 Patent Based on the Jacob, Ohki and Stucheli References.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [134] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 10, 12 and 16 Of the '499 Patent Based on the Jacob, Ohki and Stucheli References.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-10
1
DECLARATION of David Radulescu in Support re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20, # (21) Exhibit 21, # (22) Exhibit 22, # (23) Exhibit 23, # (24) Exhibit 24, # (25) Exhibit 25, # (26) Exhibit 26, # (27) Exhibit 27, # (28) Exhibit 28, # (29) Exhibit 29, # (30) Exhibit 30, # (31) Exhibit 31, # (32) Exhibit 32, # (33) Exhibit 33, # (34) Exhibit 34)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-10
1
MOTION To Clarify Certain Claim Construction Issues As To The '499 Patent. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-14
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [139] MOTION To Clarify Certain Claim Construction Issues As To The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-14
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [139] MOTION To Clarify Certain Claim Construction Issues As To The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10)(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-14
1
DECLARATION of DAVID RADULESCU in Support re: [104] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Motion [No.2] for Summary Judgement of Patent Invalidity.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 3 (part 1), # (2) Exhibit 3 (part 2), # (3) Exhibit 6)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-14
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Cree's Summary Judgment Motions and supporting materials served on Gertrude Neumark Rothschild on October 9, 2009 - October 12, 2009. Service was accepted by Daniel Ladow, Counsel for Plaintiff. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-21
1
MOTION for Jeffrey C. Morgan to Appear Pro Hac Vice.....$25.00 fee paid, #704104. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(jma)
2009-10-21
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [107] MOTION to Compel /Require Cree, Inc. To Elect One Semiconductor Expert Pursuant to The Scheduling Orders.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [107] MOTION to Compel /Require Cree, Inc. To Elect One Semiconductor Expert Pursuant to The Scheduling Orders.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [119] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant Cree, Inc's 35 U.S.C.Section 102 (f) Defense., [129] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference., [97] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 1 and 4 Of The '618 Patent Based On The Crowder References., [134] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 10, 12 and 16 Of the '499 Patent Based on the Jacob, Ohki and Stucheli References.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B, # (3) Appendix C, # (4) Appendix D)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [97] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 1 and 4 Of The '618 Patent Based On The Crowder References., [134] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 10, 12 and 16 Of the '499 Patent Based on the Jacob, Ohki and Stucheli References., [119] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant Cree, Inc's 35 U.S.C.Section 102 (f) Defense., [129] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20, # (21) Exhibit 21, # (22) Exhibit 22, # (23) Exhibit 23, # (24) Exhibit 24, # (25) Exhibit 25, # (26) Exhibit 26, # (27) Exhibit 27, # (28) Exhibit 28, # (29) Exhibit 29, # (30) Exhibit 30, # (31) Exhibit 31, # (32) Exhibit 32, # (33) Exhibit 33, # (34) Exhibit 34, # (35) Exhibit 35)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
DECLARATION of Eric Bretschneider in Opposition re: [97] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 1 and 4 Of The '618 Patent Based On The Crowder References., [119] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant Cree, Inc's 35 U.S.C.Section 102 (f) Defense., [129] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference., [134] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 10, 12 and 16 Of the '499 Patent Based on the Jacob, Ohki and Stucheli References.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B, # (3) Appendix C, # (4) Appendix D, # (5) Exhibit 1, # (6) Exhibit 2, # (7) Exhibit 3, # (8) Exhibit 4, # (9) Exhibit 5, # (10) Exhibit 6, # (11) Exhibit 7, # (12) Exhibit 8, # (13) Exhibit 9, # (14) Exhibit 10, # (15) Exhibit 11, # (16) Exhibit 12, # (17) Exhibit 13, # (18) Exhibit 14, # (19) Exhibit 15, # (20) Exhibit 16, # (21) Exhibit 17, # (22) Exhibit 18)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
DECLARATION of Dr. Ramesh Bhargava in Opposition re: [119] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant Cree, Inc's 35 U.S.C.Section 102 (f) Defense., [129] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference., [97] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 1 and 4 Of The '618 Patent Based On The Crowder References., [134] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 10, 12 and 16 Of the '499 Patent Based on the Jacob, Ohki and Stucheli References.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
COUNTER STATEMENT TO [133] Rule 56.1 Statement, [121] Rule 56.1 Statement, [136] Rule 56.1 Statement, [99] Rule 56.1 Statement. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [114] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent., [126] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [126] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent., [114] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20, # (21) Exhibit 21, # (22) Exhibit 22, # (23) Exhibit 23, # (24) Exhibit 24, # (25) Exhibit 25, # (26) Exhibit 26, # (27) Exhibit 27, # (28) Exhibit 28, # (29) Exhibit 29, # (30) Exhibit 30, # (31) Exhibit 31, # (32) Exhibit 32, # (33) Exhibit 33, # (34) Exhibit 34, # (35) Exhibit 35, # (36) Exhibit 36, # (37) Exhibit 37, # (38) Exhibit 38, # (39) Exhibit 39, # (40) Exhibit 40, # (41) Exhibit 41, # (42) Exhibit 42, # (43) Exhibit 43, # (44) Exhibit 44, # (45) Exhibit 45, # (46) Exhibit 46, # (47) Exhibit 47, # (48) Exhibit 48, # (49) Exhibit 49, # (50) Exhibit 50)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
DECLARATION of Dr. Eric Bretschneider in Opposition re: [126] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent., [114] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B, # (3) Appendix C, # (4) Appendix D, # (5) Exhibit 1, # (6) Exhibit 2, # (7) Exhibit 3, # (8) Exhibit 4, # (9) Exhibit 5, # (10) Exhibit 6, # (11) Exhibit 7, # (12) Exhibit 8, # (13) Exhibit 9, # (14) Exhibit 10, # (15) Exhibit 11, # (16) Exhibit 12, # (17) Exhibit 13, # (18) Exhibit 14, # (19) Exhibit 15, # (20) Exhibit 16, # (21) Exhibit 17, # (22) Exhibit 18, # (23) Exhibit 19, # (24) Exhibit 20, # (25) Exhibit 21, # (26) Exhibit 22, # (27) Exhibit 23, # (28) Exhibit 24, # (29) Exhibit 25, # (30) Exhibit 26, # (31) Exhibit 27, # (32) Exhibit 28, # (33) Exhibit 29, # (34) Exhibit 30, # (35) Exhibit 31, # (36) Exhibit 32, # (37) Exhibit 33, # (38) Exhibit 34, # (39) Exhibit 35, # (40) Exhibit 36, # (41) Exhibit 37, # (42) Exhibit 38, # (43) Exhibit 39, # (44) Exhibit 40, # (45) Exhibit 41, # (46) Exhibit 42, # (47) Exhibit 43, # (48) Exhibit 44, # (49) Exhibit 45, # (50) Exhibit 46, # (51) Exhibit 47, # (52) Exhibit 48, # (53) Exhibit 49, # (54) Exhibit 50, # (55) Exhibit 51, # (56) Exhibit 52)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
DECLARATION of Dr. Ramesh Bhargava in Opposition re: [114] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent., [126] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
COUNTER STATEMENT TO [116] Rule 56.1 Statement, [128] Rule 56.1 Statement. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
COUNTER STATEMENT TO [116] Rule 56.1 Statement, [128] Rule 56.1 Statement. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship., [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman., [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship., [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman., [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship., [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman., [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
2
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship., [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman., [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
2
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship., [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman., [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
2
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship., [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman., [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
2
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship., [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman., [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-23
2
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-24
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Opposition re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-24
1
RESPONSE in Opposition re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. Plaintiff Gertrude Neumark Rothschild's Counterstatement of Disputed Material Facts In Support of Her Opposition to Cree's Motion [No. 1]. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-24
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [104] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Motion [No.2] for Summary Judgement of Patent Invalidity.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-24
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Opposition re: [104] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Motion [No.2] for Summary Judgement of Patent Invalidity.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-24
1
COUNTER STATEMENT TO [110] Rule 56.1 Statement. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-24
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [102] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Memorandum in Support of Motion [No.3] For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-24
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Opposition re: [102] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Memorandum in Support of Motion [No.3] For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-24
1
COUNTER STATEMENT TO [112] Rule 56.1 Statement. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-24
1
DECLARATION of Gerard F. Diebner in Support re: [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4)(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-26
1
DECLARATION of Gerard F. Diebner in Support re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-26
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [114] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20, # (21) Exhibit 21, # (22) Exhibit 22, # (23) Exhibit 23, # (24) Exhibit 24, # (25) Exhibit 25, # (26) Exhibit 26)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-26
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [126] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20, # (21) Exhibit 21, # (22) Exhibit 22, # (23) Exhibit 23, # (24) Exhibit 24, # (25) Exhibit 25, # (26) Exhibit 26)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-26
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [119] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant Cree, Inc's 35 U.S.C.Section 102 (f) Defense.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20, # (21) Exhibit 21, # (22) Exhibit 22, # (23) Exhibit 23, # (24) Exhibit 24, # (25) Exhibit 25, # (26) Exhibit 26)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-26
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [139] MOTION To Clarify Certain Claim Construction Issues As To The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-10-28
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Opposition re: [139] MOTION To Clarify Certain Claim Construction Issues As To The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14, # (15) Exhibit 15, # (16) Exhibit 16, # (17) Exhibit 17, # (18) Exhibit 18, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 20)(Radulescu, David)
2009-10-28
1
NOTICE of Motion Hearing: DECEMBER 18, 2009, 2:00 P.M. at The United States District Courthouse, 1 Courthouse Way, Boston, MA., Courtroom #18, 5th Floor. The hearing will take place in Boston at the request of all parties. (fk)
2009-10-30
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship., [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman., [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-30
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [94] MOTION in Limine To Exclude So Much Of The Expert Report Of And Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Eric Bretschneider Which Relates To Co-Inventorship., [88] MOTION in Limine To Exclude Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Patent Expert Martin J. Adelman., [91] MOTION in Limine To Exclude the Expert Report of and Preclude Expert Testimony From Defendant's Expert Ramesh Bhargave.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2009-10-30
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [107] MOTION to Compel /Require Cree, Inc. To Elect One Semiconductor Expert Pursuant to The Scheduling Orders.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-30
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [107] MOTION to Compel /Require Cree, Inc. To Elect One Semiconductor Expert Pursuant to The Scheduling Orders.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-10-30
1
CASHIERS OFFICE REMARK in the amount of $25.00, paid on 10/21/2009, Receipt Number 704104. Payment Pro Hac Vice for Jeffrey C. Morgan (jd)
2009-10-30
1
No Actions
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting [175] Motion for Jeffrey C. Morgan to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge William G. Young on 11/4/09) (fk)
2009-11-04
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B, # (3) Appendix C)(Radulescu, David)
2009-11-04
1
RESPONSE in Support re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. Reply re: [160] Statement of Facts. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-11-04
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Support re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 4, # (2) Exhibit 5, # (3) Exhibit 7, # (4) Exhibit 9, # (5) Exhibit 10, # (6) Exhibit 16, # (7) Exhibit 17, # (8) Exhibit 18, # (9) Exhibit 19, # (10) Exhibit 20, # (11) Exhibit 23, # (12) Exhibit 24, # (13) Exhibit 25, # (14) Exhibit 26, # (15) Exhibit 27, # (16) Exhibit 28, # (17) Exhibit 29, # (18) Exhibit 30, # (19) Exhibit 31, # (20) Exhibit 33, # (21) Exhibit 35, # (22) Exhibit 36, # (23) Exhibit 37)(Radulescu, David)
2009-11-04
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [139] MOTION To Clarify Certain Claim Construction Issues As To The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-04
1
DECLARATION of James Shealy in Support re: [139] MOTION To Clarify Certain Claim Construction Issues As To The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-04
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [139] MOTION To Clarify Certain Claim Construction Issues As To The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-04
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [103] MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Cree's Motion [No.2] For Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B, # (3) Appendix D)(Radulescu, David)
2009-11-06
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Support re: [103] MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Cree's Motion [No.2] For Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 8, # (2) Exhibit 9, # (3) Exhibit 10, # (4) Exhibit 11, # (5) Exhibit 16, # (6) Exhibit 22, # (7) Exhibit 30, # (8) Exhibit 31, # (9) Exhibit 32)(Radulescu, David)
2009-11-06
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [102] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Memorandum in Support of Motion [No.3] For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2009-11-06
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [129] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-06
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [129] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claim 10 Of The '499 Patent Based On The Pearton Reference.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-06
1
DECLARATION of David C. Radulescu in Support re: [102] MOTION for Summary Judgment Cree's Memorandum in Support of Motion [No.3] For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 4, # (2) Exhibit 5, # (3) Exhibit 6, # (4) Exhibit 8, # (5) Exhibit 11, # (6) Exhibit 12, # (7) Exhibit 13, # (8) Exhibit 17, # (9) Exhibit 18, # (10) Exhibit 19, # (11) Exhibit 25, # (12) Exhibit 26, # (13) Exhibit 27, # (14) Exhibit 28, # (15) Exhibit 29)(Radulescu, David)
2009-11-06
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [119] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment On Defendant Cree, Inc's 35 U.S.C.Section 102 (f) Defense.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-06
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [97] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 1 and 4 Of The '618 Patent Based On The Crowder References.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-07
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [97] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 1 and 4 Of The '618 Patent Based On The Crowder References.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2)(Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-07
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [114] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct On The '499 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-07
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [134] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Anticipation Of Claims 10, 12 and 16 Of the '499 Patent Based on the Jacob, Ohki and Stucheli References.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-07
1
REPLY re: [150] Counter Statement to Rule 56.1. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-07
1
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [126] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-07
1
DECLARATION of Professor James Shealy in Support re: [126] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Of No Inequitable Conduct For The '618 Patent.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-07
1
REPLY re: [155] Counter Statement to Rule 56.1. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2009-11-07
1
NOTICE of U.S. International Trade Commission Investigative Staff's Statement Relating to Cree's Opposition [No. 3] Regarding Inequitable Conduct re: [151] Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion,. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1)(Radulescu, David)
2009-11-20
1
NOTICE of Rescheduling of Motion Hearing as to Time only : Judge William G Young has directed that counsel for all parties herein shall attend a hearing on the Motions for Summary Judgment at the time and place fixed below. December 18,2009, 9:30 am at the United States Courthouse, 1 Courthouse Way, Boston MA, 02210. Counsel are to report to Courtroom #18, 5th Floor where the hearing will take place. Motion Hearing set for 12/18/2009 at 09:30 AM before Judge William G. Young. (rj)
2009-12-10
1
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William G. Young: Motion Hearing held on 12/18/2009 on motions for summary judgment. Counsel present are: Plaintiff's counsel Jacobs, Ladow and Essinger. Defense Counsel are: Powers Radulescu, Finst. The parties have agreed to hold the hearing at the USDC in Boston with Judge Young sitting by designation in the SDNY. The court hears argument on the motions for summary judgment #122, #97, #119, #129, #134, #114, #126, #101, #104. After hearing the Court taked the matters under advisement. The Court will hold a jury waived trial on inequitable conduct. the parties are liable for this part of the trial as of Feb. 1, 2010. the court offer to try the whole case either jury or jury waived. The Court will hold the trial here in Boston, but all parties must agree. If it is to be a jury trial a stipulation to waive jurisdiction is to be filed. The jury trial daye is to be determined by counsel no sooner than Feb. 2010, no later than Sept. 2010. By Tue. Dec 22, 2009 at noon, counsel are to inform Clerk Smith of the decisions as to whether Judge Young is to try the patent case or it should go back to a New York Judge. (Court Reporter Donald Womack) (fk)
2009-12-18
1
No Actions
NOTICE OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE:Judge William G. Young has directed that counsel for all parties herein shall attend a TELEPHONE CONFERENCE at the time and place fixed below...@ 2:30 pm, on Friday January 8,2010. Judge Young will remain in Boston and will initiate the call to counsel at their respective offices. Telephone Conference set for 1/8/2010 at 02:30 PM before Judge William G. Young. (rj)
2009-12-23
1
TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 12/18/09 before Judge William G. Young. Court Reporter: Donald E. Womack. (fk) (Entered: 01/11/2010)
2010-01-06
1
TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on 12/18/09 before Judge William G. Young. Court Reporter: Donald E. Womack. (fk) (Entered: 01/11/2010)
2010-01-06
1
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William G. Young: Telephone Conference held on 1/8/2010. Telephone conference held. The parties will file a joint motion to transfer the case from the SD of NY to the District of MA for direct assignment to Judge Young. The motion will be filedunder the US DC NY heading for Judge Youngs signature sitting by designation. Once Judge Young grants the motion the case will then be transferred to Boston. The case is on the Running Trial List as of July 6, 2010 for a trial by jury. A final pretrial conference will be held in June. Date to be set. A further Markman hearing will be held on Feb. 16, 2010 at 2PM. If the Courtneeds a further evidentiary hearing, a date for that will be set. Briefs re; the Markman hearing are to be filed by the plaintiff by Jan. 27, 2010 and by the Defendant February 3, 2010. Reply briefs will be accepted. (Court Reporter Donald Womack) (fk)
2010-01-08
1
No Actions
TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on January 08,2010 before Judge William G. Young. Court Reporter: Donald E. Womack. (br) (Entered: 01/11/2010)
2010-01-11
1
TRANSCRIPT of proceedings held on January 08,2010 before Judge William G. Young. Court Reporter: Donald E. Womack. (br) (Entered: 01/11/2010)
2010-01-11
1
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Cree, Inc.. (Radulescu, David)
2010-01-11
1
JOINT MOTION to Change Venue to the District of Massachusetts. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Ladow, Daniel)
2010-01-15
1
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [206] JOINT MOTION to Change Venue to the District of Massachusetts.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2010-01-15
1
ORDER granting [206] Motion to Change Venue ENDORSEMENT: MOTION ALLOWED.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William G. Young on 1/19/2010) (rj)
2010-01-19
1
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Transfer this case to the USDC of MASSACHUSETTS is ALLOWED. The above entitled case is ordered transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts to be assigned to Judge William G. Young. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge William G. Young on 1/19/2010) (rj) Modified on 1/28/2010 (rj).Sealed records will be sent separately via fedex air bill #870702814557.
2010-01-19
1
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [122] MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Cree's Motion [No.1] to Dismiss for Lack of Standing.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Diebner, Gerard)
2010-01-22
1
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [101] MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Cree's Motion [No.3] For Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement., [103] MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Cree's Motion [No.2] For Summary Judgment of Patent Invalidity.. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2010-01-25
1
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild.(Ladow, Daniel)
2010-01-27
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [212] Claim Construction Statement. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Ladow, Daniel)
2010-01-27
1
DECLARATION of Daniel A. Ladow in Support re: [212] Claim Construction Statement. Document filed by Gertrude Neumark Rothschild. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 12, # (13) Exhibit 13, # (14) Exhibit 14)(Ladow, Daniel)
2010-01-27
1
CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Massachusetts, except for documents numbered 26,27,47,48,52,57,203,204 which were sent via Federal Express AIRBILL # 870702814557 on 1/28/2010. Doc.# 27, 203 and 204 are Transcripts. Doc#26,47,48,52,and 57 are sealed records. (rj)
2010-01-28
1
No Actions
Received e-mail from the United States District Court - District of Massachusetts acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 10cv10133, filed on 1/28/2010. (rj)
2010-01-28
1
No Actions
NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE SEALED MATERIAL: Notice to the attorney of record for the filing party to retrieve sealed document number 26 within thirty (30) days by appointment with the Clerk at (914) 390-4091, or the Court will dispose of them. Sealed Records Retrieval due by 7/20/2020. .(fk)
2020-06-18
1
NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE SEALED MATERIAL: Notice to the attorney of record for the filing party to retrieve sealed document number 52 within thirty (30) days by making an appointment with the Clerk at (914) 390-4091, or the Court will dispose of them. Sealed Records Retrieval due by 7/24/2020. (Pena, Francisco)
2020-06-24
1
NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE SEALED MATERIAL: Notice to the attorney of record for the filing party to retrieve sealed document number 57 within thirty (30) days by making an appointment with the Clerk at (914)390-4091, or the Court will dispose of them. Sealed Records Retrieval due by 7/24/2020. (Pena, Francisco)
2020-06-24
1
NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE SEALED MATERIAL: Notice to the attorney of record for the filing party to retrieve sealed document number 48 within thirty (30) days by making an appointment with the Clerk at 9914) 390-4091, or the Court will dispose of them. Sealed Records Retrieval due by 7/24/2020. (Pena, Francisco)
2020-06-24
1
SEALED MATERIALS DISPOSED: Document(s) 26 were destroyed since the filing party did not retrieve the material(s) within 30 days of the date indicated. The sealed record(s) were destroyed on 10/14/20..(fk)
2020-10-14
1
No Actions
SEALED MATERIALS DISPOSED: Document(s) 48 were destroyed since the filing party did not retrieve the material(s) within 30 days of the date indicated. The sealed record(s) were destroyed on 10/15/2020..(alo)
2020-10-15
1
No Actions
SEALED MATERIALS DISPOSED: Document(s) 57 were destroyed since the filing party did not retrieve the material(s) within 30 days of the date indicated. The sealed record(s) were destroyed on 10/15/20..(fk)
2020-10-15
1
No Actions
SEALED MATERIALS DISPOSED: Document(s) 52 were destroyed since the filing party did not retrieve the material(s) within 30 days of the date indicated. The sealed record(s) were destroyed on 10/20/20..(fk)
2020-10-20
1
No Actions
NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RETRIEVE SEALED MATERIAL: Notice to the attorney of record for the filing party to retrieve sealed document number 47 within thirty (30) days, by making an appointment with the Clerk at (914) 390-4091 or the Court will dispose of them. Sealed Records Retrieval due by 4/11/2022. (fk)
2022-03-10
1
SEALED MATERIALS DISPOSED: Document(s) 47 were destroyed since the filing party did not retrieve the material(s) within 30 days of the date indicated. The sealed record(s) were destroyed on 4/28/22.(fk)
2022-04-28
1
No Actions