Signify North America Corporation v. Robe Lighting Inc

Application Number	Patent Number	External Links
-	US6612704	Espacenet Google Patents
-	US6830341	Espacenet Google Patents
-	US7014336	Espacenet Google Patents

COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit, # 6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 7 Summon(s) Summons, # 8 Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/12/2020)

2020-11-12

1

View

Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao) (Entered: 11/12/2020)

2020-11-12

1

View

Summons Issued as to Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. (jao) (Entered: 11/12/2020)

2020-11-12

1

View

FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Complaint and Exhibits) (jao) (Entered: 11/12/2020)

2020-11-12

1

View

Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Jeremy P. Oczek, Jessica L. Copeland, George R. McGuire, Jonathan L. Gray, mailing date 11/12/2020, (cco) (Entered: 11/12/2020)

2020-11-12

1

View

Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment and Optional Consent

2020-11-12

1

No Actions

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Signify North America Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Signify Holding B.V. for Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jessica L. Copeland. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-13860984 by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jonathan L. Gray. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-13861030 by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for George R. McGuire. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-13861144 by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jeremy P. Oczek. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-13861162 by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

PRETRIAL ORDER Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. See attached document for full details. (hwr) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LURANA S. SNOW. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow's discovery procedures, which the parties shall be advised of by the entry of an Order. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Jessica L. Copeland to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. 7 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 7 is GRANTED. Jessica L. Copeland may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to jcopeland@bsk.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Jonathan L. Gray to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. 8 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 8 is GRANTED. Jonathan L. Gray may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to jlgray@bsk.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for George R. McGuire to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. 9 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 9 is GRANTED. George R. McGuire may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to gmcguire@bsk.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Jeremy P. Oczek to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. 10 . UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 10 is GRANTED. Jeremy P. Oczek may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to jpoczek@bsk.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

2020-11-13

1

View

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

2020-11-13

1

No Actions

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

2020-11-14

1

No Actions

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

2020-11-14

1

No Actions

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

2020-11-14

1

No Actions

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

2020-11-14

1

No Actions

SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on 1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. Robe Lighting Inc served on 11/12/2020, answer due 12/3/2020. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/16/2020)

2020-11-16

1

View

NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of Claims and Contentions by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation re 11 Pretrial Order (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/27/2020)

2020-11-27

1

View

MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 12/11/2020 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit E-mail communication, # 2 Exhibit E-mail communication)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/27/2020)

2020-11-27

1

View

VACATING GENERAL ORDER ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND PROCEDURES signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 11/29/2020. (jz) Modified per DE 114 Order on 6/10/2022 (ebz). (Entered: 11/29/2020)

2020-11-29

1

View

MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint, by Robe Lighting Inc. Attorney David S Brafman added to party Robe Lighting Inc(pty:dft). Responses due by 12/16/2020 (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/02/2020)

2020-12-02

1

View

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Martha Anne Leibell on behalf of Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Attorney Martha Anne Leibell added to party Signify Holding B.V.(pty:pla), Attorney Martha Anne Leibell added to party Signify North America Corporation(pty:pla). (Leibell, Martha) (Entered: 12/03/2020)

2020-12-03

1

View

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Robe Lighting Inc identifying Corporate Parent Robe Lighting s.r.o. for Robe Lighting Inc (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/03/2020)

2020-12-03

1

View

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 12/04/2020)

2020-12-04

1

View

MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 12/04/2020)

2020-12-04

1

View

RESPONSE to 18 Notice of Compliance, 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions by Robe Lighting Inc. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/04/2020)

2020-12-04

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Conditional Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions. 19 . Therein, Plaintiffs state that they served Defendants' counsel with their Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions based on reasonable belief of receiving "confirmation by Robe's US counsel that he was accepting service of the infringement contentions on behalf of both Robe Lighting Inc. and Robe Lighting s.r.o." Id. at 3. Plaintiffs state that Defendants' counsel confirmed receipt of the infringement contentions, but later in the day clarified their confirmation, stating that because "Robe Lighting s.r.o. has not yet been served with the complaint, is a foreign company, and has not otherwise appeared in the litigation, we are not currently accepting service of anything (including the infringement contentions) on behalf of Robe Lighting s.r.o." Id. at 4. On December 4, 2020, counsel for Defendant Robe Lighting Inc. filed its Memorandum in Response to Plaintiffs' Notice of Compliance and Conditional Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions ("Response"). 26 . In its Response, Defendant Robe Lighting Inc. disputes the effectiveness of service of the asserted claims and infringement contentions as to Robe Lighting s.r.o., stating "Defendant Robe Lighting s.r.o. is not yet subject to service of Plaintiffs' Contentions (or discovery requests or the like) because it is not an active party or subject to the Court's jurisdiction until it has been served with the Complaint and Summons." Id. at 3. Thus, only one of the two named Defendants has been effectively served with Plaintiffs' asserted claims and infringement contentions. Plaintiffs request "an extension to serve its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions on Robe Lighting s.r.o. until such time that the Complaint and Summons are deemed served on Robe Lighting s.r.o." 19 . "District courts have 'unquestionable' authority to control their own dockets." Smith v. Psychiatric Sol., Inc., 750 F.3d 1253, 1262 (11th Cir. 2014) (citation omitted). "This authority includes 'broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them.'" Id. (citation omitted). Plaintiffs argue that since "Defendants' invalidity contentions are due within 45 days of service of the infringement contentions in accordance with the Patent Pretrial Order [ 11 ], it would be highly inefficient and a waste of the Court's and the parties' resources to proceed down two separate schedules for invalidity contentions and claim construction, one schedule triggered off of [Plaintiffs'] November 25, 2020 service of the infringement contentions on Robe Lighting Inc., and a second schedule triggered off of service on Robe Lighting s.r.o. under the Hague Convention." 19 at 5. Plaintiffs further argue that "proceeding down two separate schedules for invalidity contentions and claim construction would give [Defendants] two bites at the apple, which would be manifestly unfair given the corporate relationship between Robe Lighting Inc. and Robe Lighting s.r.o." Id. Counsel for Defendant Robe Lighting Inc. does not address the requested extension in its Response. See generally 26 . Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion 19, pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Conditional Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall serve their Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions on Robe Lighting s.r.o. within seven (7) days of serving the Complaint and Summons on Robe Lighting s.r.o. Defendant Robe Lighting Inc.'s and Defendant Robe Lighting s.r.o.'s invalidity contentions shall be due forty-five (45) days thereafter. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/7/2020. (hwr) (Entered: 12/07/2020)

2020-12-07

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' filing of an Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. 24 . The Amended Complaint moots Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. 21 . Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Amended Complaint 24, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 24 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/7/2020. (hwr) (Entered: 12/07/2020)

2020-12-07

1

View

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

2020-12-07

1

No Actions

Order on Motion to Dismiss

2020-12-07

1

No Actions

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark David Passler on behalf of Robe Lighting Inc. Attorney Mark David Passler added to party Robe Lighting Inc(pty:dft). (Passler, Mark) (Entered: 12/10/2020)

2020-12-10

1

View

Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 24 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief by Robe Lighting Inc. Responses due by 1/4/2021 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief)(Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/18/2020)

2020-12-18

1

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 25 MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) filed by Robe Lighting Inc. Replies due by 12/28/2020. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/18/2020)

2020-12-18

1

View

ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand For The Amended Complaint by Robe Lighting Inc. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/18/2020)

2020-12-18

1

View

RESPONSE in Support re 25 MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 12/23/2020)

2020-12-23

1

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 30 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 24 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Replies due by 1/11/2021. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 01/04/2021)

2021-01-04

1

View

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 25 Plaintiffs' Expedited Motion for Substituted Service. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 1/4/2021. See attached document for full details. (hwr) (Entered: 01/04/2021)

2021-01-04

1

View

REPLY to Response to Motion re 30 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 24 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief filed by Robe Lighting Inc. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 01/11/2021)

2021-01-11

1

View

ORDER DENYING 30 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Demand for Injunctive Relief. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/15/2021. See attached document for full details. (hwr) (Entered: 03/16/2021)

2021-03-16

1

View

NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 03/19/2021)

2021-03-19

1

View

AFFIDAVIT of Service of ROBE Lighting S.R.O. signed by: Mgr. Hana Kohoutkoya, Judge by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

2021-03-25

1

View

Defendant Robe Lighting s.r.o.'s ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Attorney David S Brafman added to party Robe Lighting S.R.O.(pty:dft). (Brafman, David) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

2021-03-25

1

View

Agreed SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 04/30/2021)

2021-04-30

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte examination of the record. On April 30, 2021, the Parties filed a Joint Conference Report which states "[t]he Parties believe that early mediation would be appropriate for this matter and request that [the] Court enter an order referring this case to mediation in accordance with Local Rule 16... [and] respectfully request that the Court allow mediation via videoconference given the current travel limitations and restrictions due to COVID-19." 41 at 5-6. Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and Rule 16.2 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. All parties are required to participate in mediation. The mediation shall be completed within one hundred and twenty (120) days, unless the Court grants an extension for good cause shown. 2. Plaintiffs' counsel, or another attorney agreed upon by all counsel of record and any unrepresented parties, shall be responsible for scheduling the mediation conference. The parties are encouraged to avail themselves of the services of any mediator on the List of Certified Mediators, maintained in the office of the Clerk of this Court, but may select any other mediator. The parties shall agree upon a mediator and file a Notice of Mediator Selection within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order. If there is no agreement, lead counsel shall file a request for the Clerk of Court to appoint a mediator in writing within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order, and the Clerk shall designate a mediator from the List of Certified Mediators. Designation shall be made on a blind rotation basis. 3. The parties shall agree upon a place, date, and time for mediation convenient to the mediator, counsel of record, and unrepresented parties and file a Notice of Scheduling Mediation no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If the parties cannot agree to a place, date, and time for the mediation, they may motion the Court for an order dictating the place, date, and time. 4. The presence of counsel and each party or representatives of each party with full authority to enter in a full and complete compromise and settlement, either in person or via videoconference, is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. 5. All discussions, representations and statements made at the mediation conference shall be confidential and privileged. 6. At least ten (10) days prior to the mediation date, all parties shall present to the mediator a brief written summary of the case identifying issues to be resolved. Copies of those summaries shall be served on all other parties. 7. The Court may impose sanctions against parties and/or counsel who do not comply with the attendance or settlement authority requirements herein, or who otherwise violate the terms of this Order. The mediator shall report non-attendance and may recommend imposition of sanctions by the Court for non-attendance. 8. The mediator shall be compensated in accordance with the standing order of the Court entered pursuant to Rule 16.2.B.6, or on such basis as may be agreed to in writing by the parties and the mediator selected by the parties. The cost of mediation shall be shared equally by the parties unless otherwise ordered by the Court. All payments shall be remitted to the mediator within 30 days of the date of the bill. Notice to the mediator of cancellation or settlement prior to the scheduled mediation conference must be given at least two (2) full business days in advance. Failure to do so will result in imposition of a fee for one hour. 9. If a full or partial settlement is reached in this case, counsel shall promptly notify the Court of the settlement in accordance with Local Rule 16.2.F, by filing a notice of settlement signed by the counsel of record within ten (10) days of the mediation conference. Thereafter, the parties shall forthwith submit an appropriate pleading concluding the case. 10. Within five (5I) days following the mediation conference, the mediator shall file a Mediation Report indicating whether all required parties were present. The report shall also indicate whether the case settled (in full or in part), was continued with the consent of the parties, or whether the mediator declared an impasse. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 5/3/2021. (hwr) (Entered: 05/03/2021)

2021-05-03

1

View

Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Robe Lighting S.R.O. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 05/03/2021)

2021-05-03

1

View

NOTICE of Compliance with Patent Pretrial Order by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re 11 Pretrial Order (Brafman, David) (Entered: 05/03/2021)

2021-05-03

1

View

Order Referring Case to Mediation

2021-05-03

1

No Actions

NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of Proposed Claim Terms for Construction by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation re 11 Pretrial Order (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 05/17/2021)

2021-05-17

1

View

NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of List of Claim Terms Requiring Construction by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re 11 Pretrial Order (Brafman, David) (Entered: 05/17/2021)

2021-05-17

1

View

NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Michael J. Powell, Esq. Selected/Added Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation as Mediator. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 05/18/2021)

2021-05-18

1

View

Clerks Notice to Filer re 47 Notice of Mediator Selection and/or Hearing. Parties/Mediator Not Added; ERROR - The Filer failed to add all parties from the complaint/petition/removal, etc. or the mediator. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Entry of Parties Listed into CM/ECF and add the additional parties/mediator. (ebz) (Entered: 05/18/2021)

2021-05-18

1

View

Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer - Attorney

2021-05-18

1

No Actions

Notice of Entry of Parties Listed on 48 Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer - Attorney, 47 Notice of Mediator Selection and/or Hearing into CM/ECF. NOTE: New Filer(s) will appear twice, since they are also a new party in the case. New Filer(s)/Party(s): Michael J. Powell. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 05/20/2021)

2021-05-20

1

View

Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Brafman, David) (Entered: 06/25/2021)

2021-06-25

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants' Expedited Motion for an Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline. 50 . Therein, Defendants seek a thirty (30) day extension of time, up to and including August 2, 2021, to file the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement. Id. at 4. Defendants aver that Plaintiffs oppose this extension, and Defendants request a ruling on the Motion by July 1, 2021, given that the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement is due July 2, 2021. Id. at 1, 3. The Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida provide that "[t]he Court may, upon written motion and good cause shown, waive the time requirements of [] Local Rule [7.1(c)] and grant an immediate or expedited hearing on any matter requiring such expedited procedure." S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(d). UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Parties shall comply with the following expedited briefing schedule: Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' Expedited Motion for an Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline 50 shall be due on or before June 29, 2021; Defendants' reply to Plaintiffs' response shall be due on or before June 30, 2021. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 6/28/2021. (hwr) (Entered: 06/28/2021)

2021-06-28

1

View

- Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)

2021-06-28

1

No Actions

RESPONSE in Opposition re 50 Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Replies due by 7/6/2021. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 06/29/2021)

2021-06-29

1

View

MEDIATION REPORT by Michael J. Powell. Disposition: Case did not settle.(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 06/29/2021)

2021-06-29

1

View

REPLY to Response to Motion re 50 Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 06/30/2021)

2021-06-30

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants' Expedited Motion for an Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline. 50 . Therein, Defendants request a thirty (30) day extension of the deadline for the Parties to file the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement in this matter. Id. at 1. Defendants argue that additional time is necessary because counsel "requires input from Defendants' technical personnel in the Czech Republic and from Defendants' technical expert witness, who has a busy schedule this coming week in connection with a deposition in another litigation." Id. at 2-3. After conferring with Defendants' technical personnel and expert witness, Defendants will then be able to "determine whether the proposed compromised proposals can be adopted and whether any of the disputes are not material to the infringement and validity issues in this case" and "compile the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence relevant to the remaining claim construction disputes." Id. at 3. In response, Plaintiffs argue that Defendants have not shown good cause for an extension. See generally 51 . Specifically, Plaintiffs argue that the requested extension will have a domino effect on remaining deadlines and Defendants' Motion "is the latest attempt by Defendants to delay matters in this case." Id. at 2. Plaintiffs argue that the Parties have made progress towards the preliminary claim constructions and have "only ten disputed terms in four of the Patents-in-Suit" remaining, with apparently "only eight claim construction issues to present to the Court given the overlap of certain of the disputed claims." Id. at 3. In Reply, Defendants argue that the Parties exchanged updated claim construction proposals on June 25, 2021, and "extra time to obtain the analysis by Defendants' expert witness of Plaintiffs' additional proposals on claim construction is [] needed to ensure any necessary discovery requests are formulated and served before their deadline." 54 at 1-2. Defendants argue that the Court's Patent Pretrial Order 11 requires each Party "to identify intrinsic and extrinsic evidence that the party plans to rely upon either to support its own proposed construction or refute the other party's construction," and the "identification of this evidence includes the testimony of percipient and expert witnesses." Id. at 3. Defendants argue that because their technical expert witness is unavailable due to a deposition, they "cannot properly prepare their part of the joint claim construction filing without additional time." Id. Finally, Defendants argue that Plaintiffs will not be harmed or prejudiced by the extensions sought because there are currently no set dates for a Markman Hearing, the completion of fact and expert discovery, or trial. Id. The Court finds that Defendants have set forth good cause to briefly extend the deadline to file the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion 50, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' Expedited Motion for an Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline 50 is GRANTED. The Parties' Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement shall be due August 2, 2021. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 7/1/2021. (hwr) (Entered: 07/01/2021)

2021-07-01

1

View

Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 7/15/2021 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/01/2021)

2021-07-01

1

View

Order on Expedited Motion

2021-07-01

1

No Actions

Joint MOTION for Protective Order Governing Confidentiality by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/14/2021)

2021-07-14

1

Download

Joint MOTION for Protective Order Governing Confidentiality by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/14/2021)

2021-07-14

2

Download

Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/14/2021)

2021-07-14

1

View

STRICKENRESPONSE in Opposition re 56 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/22/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # 2 Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # 5 Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)Text Modified on 7/19/2021 per DE 65 ORDER (ail). (Entered: 07/15/2021)

2021-07-15

1

View

MOTION to Compel Discovery by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 7/29/2021 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Robe's Requests for Production, # 2 Exhibit B - Signify's Responses to Requests for Production, # 3 Exhibit C - Signify's Supplementa Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David) (Entered: 07/15/2021)

2021-07-15

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice 60 Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery in that it violates this Court's page limitation of 5 pages and its general conferral certification fails to provide the necessary detail to insure that the Court's conferral requirement of telephonic, in person or Zoom efforts were made. (ECF No. 20) The parties should take this opportunity to discuss all pending discovery motions currently filed with the Court. No less than a half hour shall be set aside to discuss all pending motions no later than July 19, 2021, by 3:00 p.m. If the parties are unable to resolve their disputes, Defendant may re-file a compliant Motion and certification of conferral detailing the efforts made and any agreements or issues resolved. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 7/16/2021. (sl00) (Entered: 07/16/2021)

2021-07-16

1

View

ORDER GRANTING 57 the Parties Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order Governing Confidentiality. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 7/16/2021. (jz) (Entered: 07/16/2021)

2021-07-16

1

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 56 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, Revised filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/23/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # 2 Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # 5 Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David) (Entered: 07/16/2021)

2021-07-16

1

View

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. - Withdrawal Of ECF No. 59, Defendants' Original Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Brafman, David) (Entered: 07/17/2021)

2021-07-16

1

View

Order on Motion to Compel

2021-07-16

1

No Actions

PAPERLESS ORDER striking Non-compliant Response at ECF No. 59 in light of compliant Response filed at ECF No. 63. The Clerk is ordered to strike ECF No. 59. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow (sl00) (Entered: 07/19/2021)

2021-07-19

1

View

- Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)

2021-07-19

1

No Actions

REPLY to Response to Motion re 63 RESPONSE in Opposition re 56 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, Revised filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. 56 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) Modified document link on 7/26/2021 (ebz). (Entered: 07/23/2021)

2021-07-23

1

View

Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike 63 Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 8/6/2021 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/23/2021)

2021-07-23

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING EXPEDITED BRIEFING in light of the multiple pending discovery motions for purposes of judicial economy. The Responses to ECF Nos. 58 and 67 shall be due no later than Tuesday, 7/27/21, at noon; and the Replies shall abe due no later than Thursday, 7/29/21, at noon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 7/23/2021. (sl00) (Entered: 07/23/2021)

2021-07-23

1

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 58 Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 8/3/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Signify Annual 2019 Annual Report, p. 23))(Brafman, David) (Entered: 07/27/2021)

2021-07-27

1

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 67 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike 63 Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 8/3/2021. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 07/27/2021)

2021-07-27

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER requiring Defendants to file a Notice of Filing no later than 7/28/2021 by noon, attaching the "counterproposal" it referenced in its Response at ECF No. 69 at 5. "Plaintiffs first broached the subject of an E-Discovery Order during the parties' Rule 26 Conference. In response to Plaintiffs' unduly restrictive proposal, Defendants made a counterproposal, which was rejected by Plaintiffs." Thereafter, Plaintiffs shall address why they rejected the counterproposal and reply to the arguments raised in the Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 7/27/2021. (sl00) (Entered: 07/27/2021)

2021-07-27

1

View

- Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)

2021-07-27

1

No Actions

NOTICE by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re 71 Order,, Defendants' Notice of Filing re Counterproposal (Brafman, David) (Entered: 07/28/2021)

2021-07-28

1

View

Plaintiff's REPLY in Support of Motion for Entry of Model E-Discovery Order by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/29/2021)

2021-07-29

1

View

Plaintiff's REPLY In Support of Motion to Strike Defendants' Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/29/2021)

2021-07-29

1

View

Statement of: Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 08/02/2021)

2021-08-02

1

View

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 56 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery; granting in part 58 Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of [Model] E-Discovery Order; denying 67 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 8/19/2021. (sl00) (Entered: 08/19/2021)

2021-08-19

1

View

ORDER ON E-DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 8/23/2021. (sl00) (Entered: 08/23/2021)

2021-08-23

1

View

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Deadlines for Claim Construction Discovery and Opening Claim Construction Brief by One Week by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 9/8/2021 (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 08/25/2021)

2021-08-25

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines for Claim Construction Discovery and Opening Claim Construction Brief By One Week. 78 . Therein, the Parties seek a one (1) week extension of time to complete claim construction discovery and to file Plaintiffs' opening claim construction brief. See generally id. The Parties argue that their "agreement to adjust the dates above resolves a dispute between the Parties regarding Defendants' intent to rely on an expert declaration in connection with their claim construction briefing and related disclosures." Id. at 1. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines for Claim Construction Discovery and Opening Claim Construction Brief By One Week 78 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' opening claim construction brief shall be due on September 23, 2021. All filing deadlines subsequent thereto are adjusted accordingly. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/26/2021. (hwr) (Entered: 08/26/2021)

2021-08-26

1

View

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

2021-08-26

1

No Actions

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Adjust Claim Construction Briefing Schedule by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 10/6/2021 (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 09/22/2021)

2021-09-22

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Motion to Adjust Claim Construction Briefing Schedule. 80 . Therein, the Parties argue that they have agreed to file an updated Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement reflecting their agreements on claim construction and identifying the claim terms still in dispute, and adjusting the claim construction briefing schedule as requested will allow the Parties sufficient time to brief the remaining disputed claim construction issues. Id. at 1. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Adjust Claim Construction Briefing Schedule 78 is GRANTED. The claim construction briefing schedule is adjusted as follows: Plaintiffs' opening claim construction brief shall be due on September 30, 2021; Defendants' responsive claim construction brief shall be due on October 21, 2021; and Plaintiffs' reply claim construction brief shall be due on November 4, 2021. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/23/2021. (hwr) (Entered: 09/23/2021)

2021-09-23

1

View

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

2021-09-23

1

No Actions

Statement of: Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 09/24/2021)

2021-09-24

1

View

Joint MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Plaintiffs' Opening and Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Briefs by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 09/28/2021)

2021-09-28

1

View

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jose Andre Cortes on behalf of Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Attorney Jose Andre Cortes added to party Robe Lighting Inc(pty:dft), Attorney Jose Andre Cortes added to party Robe Lighting S.R.O.(pty:dft). (Cortes, Jose) (Entered: 09/28/2021)

2021-09-28

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Motion to Increase Page Limits for Plaintiffs' Opening and Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Briefs. 83 . Therein, the Parties request that the Court "allow up to thirty (30) pages for each of Plaintiffs' opening claim construction brief and Defendants' responsive claim construction brief." Id. at 1. The Parties state that the requested increased page limits will greatly assist the Court in resolving the claim construction issues. Id. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Increase Page Limits for Plaintiffs' Opening and Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Briefs 83 is GRANTED. The Parties' respective claim construction briefs shall not exceed thirty (30) pages. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/29/2021. (tgr) (Entered: 09/29/2021)

2021-09-29

1

View

Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages

2021-09-29

1

No Actions

Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit 6, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit 7, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit 8, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit 9, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit 10, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit 11, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit 12, # 21 Exhibit Exhibit 13, # 22 Exhibit Exhibit 14, # 23 Exhibit Exhibit 15, # 24 Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 09/30/2021)

2021-09-30

1

View

MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 10/22/2021 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs' Responses to Robe's Interrogatories)(Brafman, David) (Entered: 10/08/2021)

2021-10-08

1

View

NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re 86 Statement, (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # 3 Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # 4 Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # 5 Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # 6 Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # 7 Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # 8 Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # 9 Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # 10 Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # 11 Exhibit 12, # 12 Exhibit 13, # 13 Exhibit 14, # 14 Exhibit 15, # 15 Exhibit 16, # 16 Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David) (Entered: 10/22/2021)

2021-10-21

1

View

STRICKEN NOTICE of Filing Exhibit 11 to Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re 88 Notice (Other), (Brafman, David) Modified per DE# 93 Notice of Striking on 10/27/2021 (ebz). (Entered: 10/22/2021)

2021-10-22

1

View

Clerks Notice to Filer re 89 Notice (Other). Document Not Captioned; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED - The Filer must File a Notice of Striking, then refile the document with the proper caption pursuant to Local Rules. (jas) (Entered: 10/22/2021)

2021-10-22

1

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 87 MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Replies due by 10/29/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 10/22/2021)

2021-10-22

1

View

Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer - Attorney

2021-10-22

1

No Actions

NOTICE by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re 88 Notice (Other),,, Defendants' Notice of Filing (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 11 to Defendants Claim Construction Brief) (Brafman, David) (Entered: 10/27/2021)

2021-10-27

1

View

NOTICE of Striking 89 Notice (Other) filed by Robe Lighting S.R.O., Robe Lighting s.r.o., Robe Lighting Inc by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 10/27/2021)

2021-10-27

1

View

REPLY to Response to Motion re 87 MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 10/29/2021)

2021-10-29

1

View

REPLY to 88 Notice (Other),,, Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/04/2021)

2021-11-04

1

View

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Defendants Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 11/10/2021. (qhq) (Entered: 11/10/2021)

2021-11-10

1

View

Joint MOTION for Hearing on Claim Construction by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/18/2021)

2021-11-18

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Motion to Schedule Claim Construction Hearing. 97 . Therein, the Parties request that the Court schedule a Claim Construction Hearing. Id. at 1. The Parties have completed their claim construction briefing and the next step in this case is for the Court to hold a tutorial presentation and claim construction hearing. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Motion to Schedule Claim Construction Hearing 97, the Updated Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement 82, the Patent Pretrial Order 11, the pertinent portions of the record and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Joint Motion 97 is GRANTED. A tutorial and claim construction hearing shall take place on December 20, 2021 before the Honorable K. Michael Moore, U.S. District Judge, in Courtroom 13-1 (thirteenth floor), United States Courthouse, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida. The tutorial shall take place at 10:30 a.m. The claim construction hearing shall begin at 1:00 p.m. Pursuant to the Patent Pretrial Order 11, at the tutorial presentation, "[e]ach side will be permitted 30-45 minutes to present a short summary and explanation of the technology at issue. The patent holder makes the first presentation. Visual aids are encouraged. The Court prefers that someone other than counsel make the presentation. No argument will be permitted. The proceeding is not recorded and parties may not rely on statements made at the tutorial in other aspects of the litigation." 11 at 10. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/24/2021. (elm) (Entered: 11/24/2021)

2021-11-24

1

View

Order on Motion for Hearing

2021-11-24

1

No Actions

PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge K. Michael Moore: Tutorial held on 12/20/2021. Total time in court: 1 hour(s) : 40 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Jeremy P. Oczek and Martha Anne Leibell on behalf of Plaintiffs; David S. Brafman and Mark David Passler on behalf of Defendants. Other appearances: Malvin C. Teich. Court Reporter: Sharon Velazco, 305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd.uscourts.gov. (elm) (Entered: 12/21/2021)

2021-12-21

1

View

PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge K. Michael Moore: Markman Hearing held on 12/20/2021. Total time in court: 3 hour(s). Attorney Appearance(s): Jeremy P. Oczek and Martha Anne Leibell for Plaintiffs; David S. Brafman and Mark David Passler for Defendants. Court Reporter: Sharon Velazco, 305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd.uscourts.gov. (elm) (Entered: 12/21/2021)

2021-12-21

1

View

NOTICE by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation of Filing Claim Construction Presentation Slides (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1) (Leibell, Martha) (Entered: 12/21/2021)

2021-12-21

1

View

Miscellaneous Hearing

2021-12-21

1

No Actions

Markman Hearing

2021-12-21

1

No Actions

STIPULATION Regarding Entry of Proposed Court Order for the Production of License Agreements by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 01/19/2022)

2022-01-19

1

View

Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 01/26/2022)

2022-01-26

1

View

MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Dean A. Dickie. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15350685 by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # 1 Certification of Dean A. Dickie)(Brafman, David) (Entered: 01/26/2022)

2022-01-26

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants Robe Lighting, Inc. and Robe Lighting s.r.o.'s 104 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing as to Dean A. Dickie, Esq. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion 104 is GRANTED. Dean A. Dickie may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to dean.dickie@akerman.com. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 1/27/2022. (elm) (Entered: 01/27/2022)

2022-01-27

1

View

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

2022-01-27

1

No Actions

RESPONSE in Opposition re 103 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 2/16/2022. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 02/09/2022)

2022-02-09

1

View

STIPULATION for Entry of Proposed Court Order for the Production of License Agreements by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 02/14/2022)

2022-02-14

1

View

Joint MOTION For Entry of Proposed Order for the Production of License Agreements by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 02/14/2022)

2022-02-14

1

View

ORDER granting 108 Joint Motion for Entry of Proposed Order Regarding Production of License Agreements. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 2/15/2022. (qhq) (Entered: 02/15/2022)

2022-02-15

1

View

Plaintiff's REPLY to Response to Motion re 103 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 02/16/2022)

2022-02-16

1

View

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 103 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel with respect to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 3/10/2022. (qhq) (Entered: 03/10/2022)

2022-03-10

1

View

Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow no longer assigned to case. (jmd) (Entered: 06/01/2022)

2022-06-01

1

View

Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge

2022-06-01

1

No Actions

Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge pursuant to Administrative Order(s) - 2022-47 to Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss no longer assigned to case. (bms) (Entered: 06/08/2022)

2022-06-08

1

View

Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge

2022-06-08

1

No Actions

PAPERLESS ORDER VACATING 20 DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Parties are instructed to review the Discovery Practices and Procedures that can be found on the undersigned's webpage. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 6/9/2022. (nce) (Entered: 06/09/2022)

2022-06-09

1

View

- Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)

2022-06-09

1

No Actions

STRICKEN Plaintiff's MOTION To Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information Under the Stipulated Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) Modified per DE 117 Order on 6/13/2022 (ebz). (Entered: 06/10/2022)

2022-06-10

1

View

Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike 115 Plaintiff's MOTION To Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information Under the Stipulated Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 6/24/2022 (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 06/10/2022)

2022-06-10

1

View

PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING 116 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike and STRIKING 115 Plaintiffs' Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 6/10/2022. (nce) (Entered: 06/10/2022)

2022-06-10

1

View

Order on Motion to Strike AND Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

2022-06-10

1

No Actions

Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha) (Entered: 06/13/2022)

2022-06-13

1

View

RESPONSE in Opposition re 118 Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/5/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Signify LED Patent Licensing Flyer)(Brafman, David) (Entered: 06/27/2022)

2022-06-27

1

View

REPLY to Response to Motion re 118 Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Leibell, Martha) (Entered: 07/05/2022)

2022-07-05

1

View

TRANSCRIPT of Tutorial Hearing held on 12/20/2021 before Judge K. Michael Moore, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1 - 74 pages, Court Reporter: Sharon Velazco, 305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/26/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/5/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/3/2022. (Pell Velazco, Sharon) (Entered: 07/05/2022)

2022-07-05

1

View

TRANSCRIPT of Claim Construction Hearing held on 12/20/2021 before Judge K. Michael Moore, 1 - 132 pages, Court Reporter: Sharon Velazco, 305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/26/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/5/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/3/2022. (Pell Velazco, Sharon) (Entered: 07/05/2022)

2022-07-05

1

View

ORDER granting 118 Plaintiffs' Motion to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information Under the Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 7/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (nce) (Entered: 07/31/2022)

2022-07-31

1

View

ORDER on Claim Construction. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/4/2022. See attached document for full details. (elm) (Entered: 08/04/2022)

2022-08-04

1

Download

STATUS REPORT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Leibell, Martha) (Entered: 09/06/2022)

2022-09-06

1

Download

Order Referring Case to Mediation

2022-09-12

1

No Actions

Scheduling Order

2022-09-12

1

No Actions

~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings

2022-09-12

1

No Actions

Miscellaneous Relief

2022-09-22

1

View

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

2022-09-30

1

No Actions

Notice of Settlement - aty

2022-10-27

1

View

Order Dismissing/Closing Case or Party

2022-10-27

1

No Actions

Extension of Time

2022-11-22

1

View

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

2022-11-23

1

No Actions

Extension of Time

2022-12-19

1

View

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

2022-12-19

1

No Actions

Stipulation of Dismissal - aty

2022-12-22

1

View

Order Dismissing/Closing Case or Party

2022-12-27

1

No Actions

Overview

Parties

Defendant

Robe Lighting S.R.O. Follow

Represented By

Robe Lighting Inc Follow

Represented By

Plaintiff

Signify Holding B.V. Follow

Represented By

Signify North America Corporation Follow

Represented By

Court & Judges

Patents Involved

Docket Entries

Summons Issued as to Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. (jao) (Entered: 11/12/2020)

FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: # 1 Supplement Complaint and Exhibits) (jao) (Entered: 11/12/2020)

Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Jeremy P. Oczek, Jessica L. Copeland, George R. McGuire, Jonathan L. Gray, mailing date 11/12/2020, (cco) (Entered: 11/12/2020)

Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment and Optional Consent

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Signify North America Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Signify Holding B.V. for Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

PRETRIAL ORDER Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. See attached document for full details. (hwr) (Entered: 11/13/2020)

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on 1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. Robe Lighting Inc served on 11/12/2020, answer due 12/3/2020. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/16/2020)

NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of Claims and Contentions by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation re 11 Pretrial Order (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/27/2020)

MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 12/11/2020 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit E-mail communication, # 2 Exhibit E-mail communication)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 11/27/2020)

VACATING GENERAL ORDER ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND PROCEDURES signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 11/29/2020. (jz) Modified per DE 114 Order on 6/10/2022 (ebz). (Entered: 11/29/2020)

MOTION to Dismiss 1 Complaint, by Robe Lighting Inc. Attorney David S Brafman added to party Robe Lighting Inc(pty:dft). Responses due by 12/16/2020 (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/02/2020)

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Robe Lighting Inc identifying Corporate Parent Robe Lighting s.r.o. for Robe Lighting Inc (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/03/2020)

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 12/04/2020)

MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 12/04/2020)

RESPONSE to 18 Notice of Compliance, 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions by Robe Lighting Inc. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/04/2020)

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

Order on Motion to Dismiss

NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark David Passler on behalf of Robe Lighting Inc. Attorney Mark David Passler added to party Robe Lighting Inc(pty:dft). (Passler, Mark) (Entered: 12/10/2020)

RESPONSE in Opposition re 25 MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) filed by Robe Lighting Inc. Replies due by 12/28/2020. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/18/2020)

ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand For The Amended Complaint by Robe Lighting Inc. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 12/18/2020)

RESPONSE in Support re 25 MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 12/23/2020)

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 25 Plaintiffs' Expedited Motion for Substituted Service. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 1/4/2021. See attached document for full details. (hwr) (Entered: 01/04/2021)

REPLY to Response to Motion re 30 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 24 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief filed by Robe Lighting Inc. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 01/11/2021)

ORDER DENYING 30 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Demand for Injunctive Relief. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/15/2021. See attached document for full details. (hwr) (Entered: 03/16/2021)

NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 03/19/2021)

AFFIDAVIT of Service of ROBE Lighting S.R.O. signed by: Mgr. Hana Kohoutkoya, Judge by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

Defendant Robe Lighting s.r.o.'s ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Attorney David S Brafman added to party Robe Lighting S.R.O.(pty:dft). (Brafman, David) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

Agreed SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 04/30/2021)

Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Robe Lighting S.R.O. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 05/03/2021)

NOTICE of Compliance with Patent Pretrial Order by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re 11 Pretrial Order (Brafman, David) (Entered: 05/03/2021)

Order Referring Case to Mediation

NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of Proposed Claim Terms for Construction by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation re 11 Pretrial Order (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 05/17/2021)

NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of List of Claim Terms Requiring Construction by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re 11 Pretrial Order (Brafman, David) (Entered: 05/17/2021)

NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Michael J. Powell, Esq. Selected/Added Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation as Mediator. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 05/18/2021)

Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer - Attorney

Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Brafman, David) (Entered: 06/25/2021)

- Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)

RESPONSE in Opposition re 50 Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Replies due by 7/6/2021. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 06/29/2021)

MEDIATION REPORT by Michael J. Powell. Disposition: Case did not settle.(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 06/29/2021)

REPLY to Response to Motion re 50 Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. (Brafman, David) (Entered: 06/30/2021)

Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 7/15/2021 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/01/2021)

Order on Expedited Motion

Joint MOTION for Protective Order Governing Confidentiality by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/14/2021)

Joint MOTION for Protective Order Governing Confidentiality by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/14/2021)

ORDER GRANTING 57 the Parties Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order Governing Confidentiality. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 7/16/2021. (jz) (Entered: 07/16/2021)

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. - Withdrawal Of ECF No. 59, Defendants' Original Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Brafman, David) (Entered: 07/17/2021)

Order on Motion to Compel

PAPERLESS ORDER striking Non-compliant Response at ECF No. 59 in light of compliant Response filed at ECF No. 63. The Clerk is ordered to strike ECF No. 59. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow (sl00) (Entered: 07/19/2021)

- Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)

- Order (PAPERLESS or pdf attached)

NOTICE by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re 71 Order,, Defendants' Notice of Filing re Counterproposal (Brafman, David) (Entered: 07/28/2021)

Plaintiff's REPLY in Support of Motion for Entry of Model E-Discovery Order by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/29/2021)

Plaintiff's REPLY In Support of Motion to Strike Defendants' Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 07/29/2021)

Statement of: Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 08/02/2021)

ORDER ON E-DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 8/23/2021. (sl00) (Entered: 08/23/2021)

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Deadlines for Claim Construction Discovery and Opening Claim Construction Brief by One Week by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 9/8/2021 (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 08/25/2021)

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Adjust Claim Construction Briefing Schedule by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 10/6/2021 (Reiss, Andrew) (Entered: 09/22/2021)

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

Robe Lighting S.R.O.

Robe Lighting Inc

Signify Holding B.V.

Signify North America Corporation