Global Patent Case Tracking and Litigation Research Platform

Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. vs. Vida Sense Innovation Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2022-00109

Filing Date 2022-08-24

Decision Type Termination Decision: Post-DI Settlement

PDF Track Case View Details

Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. vs. Vida Sense Innovation Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2022-00108

Filing Date 2022-08-24

Decision Type Termination Decision: Post-DI Settlement

PDF Track Case View Details

Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. vs. Vida Sense Innovation Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2022-00109

Filing Date 2022-05-12

Decision Type DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. sec 314, 37 C.F.R. sec 42.4

PDF Track Case View Details

Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. vs. Vida Sense Innovation Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2022-00108

Filing Date 2022-05-12

Decision Type Institution Decision: Grant

PDF Track Case View Details

Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. vs. Vida Sense Innovation Ltd.

PTAB-CASES Terminated

Status: Terminated-Settled

Proceeding Number IPR2022-00109

Filing Date 2021-10-28

Cause / Proceeding IPR

Track Case View Details

Chongqing HKC Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. vs. Vida Sense Innovation Ltd.

PTAB-CASES Terminated

Status: Terminated-Settled

Proceeding Number IPR2022-00108

Filing Date 2021-10-28

Cause / Proceeding IPR

Track Case View Details

Sentegra, LLC v. Asus Computer International

PATENT LITIGATION Litigation

Status: Litigation Filed

Docket Number 3:16-cv-03136

Filing Date 2016-06-09

Cause / Court 35:271 Patent Infringement

Track Case View Details