Search Platform

All Cases PTAB Litigations UPC Oppositions

Explore PTAB cases, litigation, UPC, and oppositions – All in one place. Find the right case faster with powerful filters and structured results.

CasLoc is a comprehensive patent case research platform that bring together patent case data from multiple jurisdictions into a single streamlined platform. Designed to simplify how legal and IP professionals access, analyze, and track case information. From flexible search to structured case insights, everything is designed to reduce manual effort and helps to focus on analysis and decision-making.

Filters

vs

Filing Date

From

To

Attorney

All Cases Feed

Global Patent Tracker

94 Found <

1

BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. et al. vs. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2025-01477

Filing Date 2025-12-30

Decision Type DECISION Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial 37 C.F.R. § 42.74

PDF View Details

BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. et al. vs. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2025-01476

Filing Date 2025-12-30

Decision Type DECISION Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial 37 C.F.R. § 42.74

PDF View Details

BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. et al. vs. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.

PTAB-CASES Terminated

Status: Terminated-Settled

Proceeding Number IPR2025-01477

Filing Date 2025-08-31

Cause / Proceeding IPR

View Details

BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. et al. vs. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.

PTAB-CASES Terminated

Status: Terminated-Settled

Proceeding Number IPR2025-01476

Filing Date 2025-08-31

Cause / Proceeding IPR

View Details

Satco Products, Inc. vs. Seoul Viosys Co. Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2020-00608

Filing Date 2021-09-10

Decision Type Final Written Decision: original

PDF View Details

Satco Products, Inc. vs. Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Rehearing Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2020-00655

Filing Date 2020-12-02

Decision Type DECISION Denying Petitioner¿¿¿s Request for Rehearing 35 U.S.C. ¿¿ 314

PDF View Details

Satco Products, Inc. vs. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Rehearing Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2020-00151

Filing Date 2020-11-09

Decision Type Decision - Denying Petitioner's Request for Rehearing - 37 CFR 42.71(d)

PDF View Details

Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co. Ltd. et al. vs. Wi-LAN, Inc. et al.

PTAB-DECISIONS Rehearing Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2020-00302

Filing Date 2020-09-21

Decision Type DECISION Denying Petitioner¿¿¿s Request on Rehearing of Decision Denying Institution 37 C.F.R. ¿¿ 42.71(d)

PDF View Details

Satco Products, Inc. vs. Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2020-00655

Filing Date 2020-09-16

Decision Type DECISION Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review

PDF View Details

T-Max (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. et al. vs. Lund Motion Products, Inc. et al.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2018-01637

Filing Date 2020-03-12

Decision Type Judgment Final Written Decision Determining All Challenged Claims Unpatentable

PDF View Details

T-Max (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. et al. vs. Lund Motion Products, Inc. et al.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2018-01636

Filing Date 2020-03-12

Decision Type Judgment Final Written Decision Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable

PDF View Details

T-Max (Hangzhou) Technology Co., Ltd. et al. vs. Lund Motion Products, Inc. et al.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2018-01638

Filing Date 2020-03-10

Decision Type Final Written Decision Determining No Challenged Claims Unpatentable Granting Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal 35 U.S.C. sec(s) 318(a), 316(a)(1)

PDF View Details

Satco Products, Inc. vs. Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.

PTAB-CASES Institution Denied

Status: Institution Denied

Proceeding Number IPR2020-00655

Filing Date 2020-03-02

Cause / Proceeding IPR

View Details

Satco Products, Inc. vs. Seoul Viosys Co. Ltd.

PTAB-CASES Final Written Decision

Status: Final Written Decision

Proceeding Number IPR2020-00608

Filing Date 2020-02-25

Cause / Proceeding IPR

View Details

Universal Imaging Industries, LLC vs. Lexmark International, Inc.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2019-01378

Filing Date 2020-02-03

Decision Type Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review 35 U.S.C. sec 314

PDF View Details

Satco Products, Inc. vs. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.

PTAB-CASES Institution Denied

Status: Institution Denied

Proceeding Number IPR2020-00151

Filing Date 2019-11-15

Cause / Proceeding IPR

View Details

LG Innotek Co. Ltd. vs. Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2019-01160

Filing Date 2019-11-13

Decision Type Decision Dismissal Prior to Institution of Trial

PDF View Details

LG Innotek Co. Ltd. vs. Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2019-01159

Filing Date 2019-11-13

Decision Type Decision Dismissal Prior to Institution of Trial

PDF View Details

LG Innotek Co. Ltd. vs. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2019-01158

Filing Date 2019-11-13

Decision Type Termination Decision Document

PDF View Details

LG Innotek Co. Ltd. vs. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.

PTAB-DECISIONS Decision

Status: Decided

Proceeding Number IPR2019-01157

Filing Date 2019-11-13

Decision Type Termination Decision Document

PDF View Details

94 Found <

1